Cargando…
Multi-Criteria Evaluation for Sorting Motion Planner Alternatives
Automated vehicles are expected to push towards the evolution of the mobility environment in the near future by increasing vehicle stability and decreasing commute time and vehicle fuel consumption. One of the main limitations they face is motion sickness (MS), which can put their wide impact at ris...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9316958/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35890856 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22145177 |
_version_ | 1784754940548218880 |
---|---|
author | Papaioannou, Georgios Htike, Zaw Lin, Chenhui Siampis, Efstathios Longo, Stefano Velenis, Efstathios |
author_facet | Papaioannou, Georgios Htike, Zaw Lin, Chenhui Siampis, Efstathios Longo, Stefano Velenis, Efstathios |
author_sort | Papaioannou, Georgios |
collection | PubMed |
description | Automated vehicles are expected to push towards the evolution of the mobility environment in the near future by increasing vehicle stability and decreasing commute time and vehicle fuel consumption. One of the main limitations they face is motion sickness (MS), which can put their wide impact at risk, as well as their acceptance by the public. In this direction, this paper presents the application of motion planning in order to minimise motion sickness in automated vehicles. Thus, an optimal control problem is formulated through which we seek the optimum velocity profile for a predefined road path for multiple fixed journey time (JT) solutions. In this way, a Pareto Front will be generated for the conflicting objectives of MS and JT. Despite the importance of optimising both of these, the optimum velocity profile should be selected after taking into consideration additional objectives. Therefore, as the optimal control is focused on the MS minimisation, a sorting algorithm is applied to seek the optimum solution among the pareto alternatives of the fixed time solutions. The aim is that this solution will correspond to the best velocity profile that also ensures the optimum compromise between motion comfort, safety and driving behaviour, energy efficiency, journey time and riding confidence. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9316958 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93169582022-07-27 Multi-Criteria Evaluation for Sorting Motion Planner Alternatives Papaioannou, Georgios Htike, Zaw Lin, Chenhui Siampis, Efstathios Longo, Stefano Velenis, Efstathios Sensors (Basel) Article Automated vehicles are expected to push towards the evolution of the mobility environment in the near future by increasing vehicle stability and decreasing commute time and vehicle fuel consumption. One of the main limitations they face is motion sickness (MS), which can put their wide impact at risk, as well as their acceptance by the public. In this direction, this paper presents the application of motion planning in order to minimise motion sickness in automated vehicles. Thus, an optimal control problem is formulated through which we seek the optimum velocity profile for a predefined road path for multiple fixed journey time (JT) solutions. In this way, a Pareto Front will be generated for the conflicting objectives of MS and JT. Despite the importance of optimising both of these, the optimum velocity profile should be selected after taking into consideration additional objectives. Therefore, as the optimal control is focused on the MS minimisation, a sorting algorithm is applied to seek the optimum solution among the pareto alternatives of the fixed time solutions. The aim is that this solution will correspond to the best velocity profile that also ensures the optimum compromise between motion comfort, safety and driving behaviour, energy efficiency, journey time and riding confidence. MDPI 2022-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9316958/ /pubmed/35890856 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22145177 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Papaioannou, Georgios Htike, Zaw Lin, Chenhui Siampis, Efstathios Longo, Stefano Velenis, Efstathios Multi-Criteria Evaluation for Sorting Motion Planner Alternatives |
title | Multi-Criteria Evaluation for Sorting Motion Planner Alternatives |
title_full | Multi-Criteria Evaluation for Sorting Motion Planner Alternatives |
title_fullStr | Multi-Criteria Evaluation for Sorting Motion Planner Alternatives |
title_full_unstemmed | Multi-Criteria Evaluation for Sorting Motion Planner Alternatives |
title_short | Multi-Criteria Evaluation for Sorting Motion Planner Alternatives |
title_sort | multi-criteria evaluation for sorting motion planner alternatives |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9316958/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35890856 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22145177 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT papaioannougeorgios multicriteriaevaluationforsortingmotionplanneralternatives AT htikezaw multicriteriaevaluationforsortingmotionplanneralternatives AT linchenhui multicriteriaevaluationforsortingmotionplanneralternatives AT siampisefstathios multicriteriaevaluationforsortingmotionplanneralternatives AT longostefano multicriteriaevaluationforsortingmotionplanneralternatives AT velenisefstathios multicriteriaevaluationforsortingmotionplanneralternatives |