Cargando…

Multi-Criteria Evaluation for Sorting Motion Planner Alternatives

Automated vehicles are expected to push towards the evolution of the mobility environment in the near future by increasing vehicle stability and decreasing commute time and vehicle fuel consumption. One of the main limitations they face is motion sickness (MS), which can put their wide impact at ris...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Papaioannou, Georgios, Htike, Zaw, Lin, Chenhui, Siampis, Efstathios, Longo, Stefano, Velenis, Efstathios
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9316958/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35890856
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22145177
_version_ 1784754940548218880
author Papaioannou, Georgios
Htike, Zaw
Lin, Chenhui
Siampis, Efstathios
Longo, Stefano
Velenis, Efstathios
author_facet Papaioannou, Georgios
Htike, Zaw
Lin, Chenhui
Siampis, Efstathios
Longo, Stefano
Velenis, Efstathios
author_sort Papaioannou, Georgios
collection PubMed
description Automated vehicles are expected to push towards the evolution of the mobility environment in the near future by increasing vehicle stability and decreasing commute time and vehicle fuel consumption. One of the main limitations they face is motion sickness (MS), which can put their wide impact at risk, as well as their acceptance by the public. In this direction, this paper presents the application of motion planning in order to minimise motion sickness in automated vehicles. Thus, an optimal control problem is formulated through which we seek the optimum velocity profile for a predefined road path for multiple fixed journey time (JT) solutions. In this way, a Pareto Front will be generated for the conflicting objectives of MS and JT. Despite the importance of optimising both of these, the optimum velocity profile should be selected after taking into consideration additional objectives. Therefore, as the optimal control is focused on the MS minimisation, a sorting algorithm is applied to seek the optimum solution among the pareto alternatives of the fixed time solutions. The aim is that this solution will correspond to the best velocity profile that also ensures the optimum compromise between motion comfort, safety and driving behaviour, energy efficiency, journey time and riding confidence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9316958
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93169582022-07-27 Multi-Criteria Evaluation for Sorting Motion Planner Alternatives Papaioannou, Georgios Htike, Zaw Lin, Chenhui Siampis, Efstathios Longo, Stefano Velenis, Efstathios Sensors (Basel) Article Automated vehicles are expected to push towards the evolution of the mobility environment in the near future by increasing vehicle stability and decreasing commute time and vehicle fuel consumption. One of the main limitations they face is motion sickness (MS), which can put their wide impact at risk, as well as their acceptance by the public. In this direction, this paper presents the application of motion planning in order to minimise motion sickness in automated vehicles. Thus, an optimal control problem is formulated through which we seek the optimum velocity profile for a predefined road path for multiple fixed journey time (JT) solutions. In this way, a Pareto Front will be generated for the conflicting objectives of MS and JT. Despite the importance of optimising both of these, the optimum velocity profile should be selected after taking into consideration additional objectives. Therefore, as the optimal control is focused on the MS minimisation, a sorting algorithm is applied to seek the optimum solution among the pareto alternatives of the fixed time solutions. The aim is that this solution will correspond to the best velocity profile that also ensures the optimum compromise between motion comfort, safety and driving behaviour, energy efficiency, journey time and riding confidence. MDPI 2022-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9316958/ /pubmed/35890856 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22145177 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Papaioannou, Georgios
Htike, Zaw
Lin, Chenhui
Siampis, Efstathios
Longo, Stefano
Velenis, Efstathios
Multi-Criteria Evaluation for Sorting Motion Planner Alternatives
title Multi-Criteria Evaluation for Sorting Motion Planner Alternatives
title_full Multi-Criteria Evaluation for Sorting Motion Planner Alternatives
title_fullStr Multi-Criteria Evaluation for Sorting Motion Planner Alternatives
title_full_unstemmed Multi-Criteria Evaluation for Sorting Motion Planner Alternatives
title_short Multi-Criteria Evaluation for Sorting Motion Planner Alternatives
title_sort multi-criteria evaluation for sorting motion planner alternatives
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9316958/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35890856
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22145177
work_keys_str_mv AT papaioannougeorgios multicriteriaevaluationforsortingmotionplanneralternatives
AT htikezaw multicriteriaevaluationforsortingmotionplanneralternatives
AT linchenhui multicriteriaevaluationforsortingmotionplanneralternatives
AT siampisefstathios multicriteriaevaluationforsortingmotionplanneralternatives
AT longostefano multicriteriaevaluationforsortingmotionplanneralternatives
AT velenisefstathios multicriteriaevaluationforsortingmotionplanneralternatives