Cargando…
Influence of Xenogeneic and Alloplastic Carriers for Bone Augmentation on Human Unrestricted Somatic Stem Cells
Alloplastic and xenogeneic bone grafting materials are frequently used for bone augmentation. The effect of these materials on precursor cells for bone augmentation is yet to be determined. The aim of this study was to ascertain, in vitro, how augmentation materials influence the growth rates and vi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9317635/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35888245 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15144779 |
_version_ | 1784755104948158464 |
---|---|
author | Schorn, Lara Sine, Anna Berr, Karin Handschel, Jörg Depprich, Rita Kübler, Norbert R. Sproll, Christoph Rana, Majeed Lommen, Julian |
author_facet | Schorn, Lara Sine, Anna Berr, Karin Handschel, Jörg Depprich, Rita Kübler, Norbert R. Sproll, Christoph Rana, Majeed Lommen, Julian |
author_sort | Schorn, Lara |
collection | PubMed |
description | Alloplastic and xenogeneic bone grafting materials are frequently used for bone augmentation. The effect of these materials on precursor cells for bone augmentation is yet to be determined. The aim of this study was to ascertain, in vitro, how augmentation materials influence the growth rates and viability of human unrestricted somatic stem cells. The biocompatibility of two xenogeneic and one alloplastic bone graft was tested using human unrestricted somatic stem cells (USSCs). Proliferation, growth, survival and attachment of unrestricted somatic stem cells were monitored after 24 h, 48 h and 7 days. Furthermore, cell shape and morphology were evaluated by SEM. Scaffolds were assessed for their physical properties by Micro-CT imaging. USSCs showed distinct proliferation on the different carriers. Greatest proliferation was observed on the xenogeneic carriers along with improved viability of the cells. Pore sizes of the scaffolds varied significantly, with the xenogeneic materials providing greater pore sizes than the synthetic inorganic material. Unrestricted somatic stem cells in combination with a bovine collagenous bone block seem to be very compatible. A scaffold’s surface morphology, pore size and bioactive characteristics influence the proliferation, attachment and viability of USSCs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9317635 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93176352022-07-27 Influence of Xenogeneic and Alloplastic Carriers for Bone Augmentation on Human Unrestricted Somatic Stem Cells Schorn, Lara Sine, Anna Berr, Karin Handschel, Jörg Depprich, Rita Kübler, Norbert R. Sproll, Christoph Rana, Majeed Lommen, Julian Materials (Basel) Article Alloplastic and xenogeneic bone grafting materials are frequently used for bone augmentation. The effect of these materials on precursor cells for bone augmentation is yet to be determined. The aim of this study was to ascertain, in vitro, how augmentation materials influence the growth rates and viability of human unrestricted somatic stem cells. The biocompatibility of two xenogeneic and one alloplastic bone graft was tested using human unrestricted somatic stem cells (USSCs). Proliferation, growth, survival and attachment of unrestricted somatic stem cells were monitored after 24 h, 48 h and 7 days. Furthermore, cell shape and morphology were evaluated by SEM. Scaffolds were assessed for their physical properties by Micro-CT imaging. USSCs showed distinct proliferation on the different carriers. Greatest proliferation was observed on the xenogeneic carriers along with improved viability of the cells. Pore sizes of the scaffolds varied significantly, with the xenogeneic materials providing greater pore sizes than the synthetic inorganic material. Unrestricted somatic stem cells in combination with a bovine collagenous bone block seem to be very compatible. A scaffold’s surface morphology, pore size and bioactive characteristics influence the proliferation, attachment and viability of USSCs. MDPI 2022-07-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9317635/ /pubmed/35888245 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15144779 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Schorn, Lara Sine, Anna Berr, Karin Handschel, Jörg Depprich, Rita Kübler, Norbert R. Sproll, Christoph Rana, Majeed Lommen, Julian Influence of Xenogeneic and Alloplastic Carriers for Bone Augmentation on Human Unrestricted Somatic Stem Cells |
title | Influence of Xenogeneic and Alloplastic Carriers for Bone Augmentation on Human Unrestricted Somatic Stem Cells |
title_full | Influence of Xenogeneic and Alloplastic Carriers for Bone Augmentation on Human Unrestricted Somatic Stem Cells |
title_fullStr | Influence of Xenogeneic and Alloplastic Carriers for Bone Augmentation on Human Unrestricted Somatic Stem Cells |
title_full_unstemmed | Influence of Xenogeneic and Alloplastic Carriers for Bone Augmentation on Human Unrestricted Somatic Stem Cells |
title_short | Influence of Xenogeneic and Alloplastic Carriers for Bone Augmentation on Human Unrestricted Somatic Stem Cells |
title_sort | influence of xenogeneic and alloplastic carriers for bone augmentation on human unrestricted somatic stem cells |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9317635/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35888245 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15144779 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schornlara influenceofxenogeneicandalloplasticcarriersforboneaugmentationonhumanunrestrictedsomaticstemcells AT sineanna influenceofxenogeneicandalloplasticcarriersforboneaugmentationonhumanunrestrictedsomaticstemcells AT berrkarin influenceofxenogeneicandalloplasticcarriersforboneaugmentationonhumanunrestrictedsomaticstemcells AT handscheljorg influenceofxenogeneicandalloplasticcarriersforboneaugmentationonhumanunrestrictedsomaticstemcells AT depprichrita influenceofxenogeneicandalloplasticcarriersforboneaugmentationonhumanunrestrictedsomaticstemcells AT kublernorbertr influenceofxenogeneicandalloplasticcarriersforboneaugmentationonhumanunrestrictedsomaticstemcells AT sprollchristoph influenceofxenogeneicandalloplasticcarriersforboneaugmentationonhumanunrestrictedsomaticstemcells AT ranamajeed influenceofxenogeneicandalloplasticcarriersforboneaugmentationonhumanunrestrictedsomaticstemcells AT lommenjulian influenceofxenogeneicandalloplasticcarriersforboneaugmentationonhumanunrestrictedsomaticstemcells |