Cargando…

Visible Foliar Injury and Ecophysiological Responses to Ozone and Drought in Oak Seedlings

To verify the responses of visible foliar injury (VFI), we exposed seedlings of three oak species for 4.5 months in an open air facility, using differing ozone (O(3)) and drought treatments: O(3) (three levels from ambient to ×1.4 ambient), and drought (three levels of irrigation from 40% to 100% fi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moura, Barbara Baesso, Paoletti, Elena, Badea, Ovidiu, Ferrini, Francesco, Hoshika, Yasutomo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9317710/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35890470
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants11141836
_version_ 1784755123089571840
author Moura, Barbara Baesso
Paoletti, Elena
Badea, Ovidiu
Ferrini, Francesco
Hoshika, Yasutomo
author_facet Moura, Barbara Baesso
Paoletti, Elena
Badea, Ovidiu
Ferrini, Francesco
Hoshika, Yasutomo
author_sort Moura, Barbara Baesso
collection PubMed
description To verify the responses of visible foliar injury (VFI), we exposed seedlings of three oak species for 4.5 months in an open air facility, using differing ozone (O(3)) and drought treatments: O(3) (three levels from ambient to ×1.4 ambient), and drought (three levels of irrigation from 40% to 100% field capacity). We related the accumulated phytotoxic O(3) dose (POD(1)) and cumulative drought index (CDI) to the O(3) and drought VFI and assessed growth increment (height, diameter, leaf number), biomass (of all organs), and physiological parameters: net photosynthesis per plant (P(n)), photosynthetic nitrogen (PNUE) and phosphorus use efficiency (PPUE)). The results indicated that an increase in POD(1) promoted O(3) VFI in Quercus robur and Quercus pubescens, while Quercus ilex was asymptomatic. The POD(1)-based critical level at the onset of O(3) VFI was lower for Q. robur than for Q. pubescens (12.2 vs. 15.6 mmol m(−2) POD(1)). Interestingly, drought reduced O(3) VFI in Q. robur but increased it in Q. pubescens. Both O(3) and drought were detrimental to the plant biomass. However, Q. robur and Q. pubescens invested more in shoots than in roots, while Q. ilex invested more in roots, which might be related to a hormetic mechanism. P(n), PNUE and PPUE decreased in all species under drought, and only in the sensitive Q. robur (PPUE) and Q. pubescens (PNUE) under O(3). This study confirms that POD(1) is a good indicator to explain the development of O(3) VFI and helps a differential diagnosis of co-occurring drought and O(3) VFI in oak forests.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9317710
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93177102022-07-27 Visible Foliar Injury and Ecophysiological Responses to Ozone and Drought in Oak Seedlings Moura, Barbara Baesso Paoletti, Elena Badea, Ovidiu Ferrini, Francesco Hoshika, Yasutomo Plants (Basel) Article To verify the responses of visible foliar injury (VFI), we exposed seedlings of three oak species for 4.5 months in an open air facility, using differing ozone (O(3)) and drought treatments: O(3) (three levels from ambient to ×1.4 ambient), and drought (three levels of irrigation from 40% to 100% field capacity). We related the accumulated phytotoxic O(3) dose (POD(1)) and cumulative drought index (CDI) to the O(3) and drought VFI and assessed growth increment (height, diameter, leaf number), biomass (of all organs), and physiological parameters: net photosynthesis per plant (P(n)), photosynthetic nitrogen (PNUE) and phosphorus use efficiency (PPUE)). The results indicated that an increase in POD(1) promoted O(3) VFI in Quercus robur and Quercus pubescens, while Quercus ilex was asymptomatic. The POD(1)-based critical level at the onset of O(3) VFI was lower for Q. robur than for Q. pubescens (12.2 vs. 15.6 mmol m(−2) POD(1)). Interestingly, drought reduced O(3) VFI in Q. robur but increased it in Q. pubescens. Both O(3) and drought were detrimental to the plant biomass. However, Q. robur and Q. pubescens invested more in shoots than in roots, while Q. ilex invested more in roots, which might be related to a hormetic mechanism. P(n), PNUE and PPUE decreased in all species under drought, and only in the sensitive Q. robur (PPUE) and Q. pubescens (PNUE) under O(3). This study confirms that POD(1) is a good indicator to explain the development of O(3) VFI and helps a differential diagnosis of co-occurring drought and O(3) VFI in oak forests. MDPI 2022-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9317710/ /pubmed/35890470 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants11141836 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Moura, Barbara Baesso
Paoletti, Elena
Badea, Ovidiu
Ferrini, Francesco
Hoshika, Yasutomo
Visible Foliar Injury and Ecophysiological Responses to Ozone and Drought in Oak Seedlings
title Visible Foliar Injury and Ecophysiological Responses to Ozone and Drought in Oak Seedlings
title_full Visible Foliar Injury and Ecophysiological Responses to Ozone and Drought in Oak Seedlings
title_fullStr Visible Foliar Injury and Ecophysiological Responses to Ozone and Drought in Oak Seedlings
title_full_unstemmed Visible Foliar Injury and Ecophysiological Responses to Ozone and Drought in Oak Seedlings
title_short Visible Foliar Injury and Ecophysiological Responses to Ozone and Drought in Oak Seedlings
title_sort visible foliar injury and ecophysiological responses to ozone and drought in oak seedlings
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9317710/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35890470
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants11141836
work_keys_str_mv AT mourabarbarabaesso visiblefoliarinjuryandecophysiologicalresponsestoozoneanddroughtinoakseedlings
AT paolettielena visiblefoliarinjuryandecophysiologicalresponsestoozoneanddroughtinoakseedlings
AT badeaovidiu visiblefoliarinjuryandecophysiologicalresponsestoozoneanddroughtinoakseedlings
AT ferrinifrancesco visiblefoliarinjuryandecophysiologicalresponsestoozoneanddroughtinoakseedlings
AT hoshikayasutomo visiblefoliarinjuryandecophysiologicalresponsestoozoneanddroughtinoakseedlings