Cargando…

Fetal Growth Restriction: Comparison of Biometric Parameters

The aim of this study was to identify growth-restricted fetuses using biometric parameters and to assess the validity and clinical value of individual ultrasound parameters and ratios, such as transcerebellar diameter/abdominal circumference (TCD/AC), head circumference/abdominal circumference (HC/A...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marchand, Carolin, Köppe, Jeanette, Köster, Helen Ann, Oelmeier, Kathrin, Schmitz, Ralf, Steinhard, Johannes, Fruscalzo, Arrigo, Kubiak, Karol
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9317726/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35887622
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12071125
_version_ 1784755126823550976
author Marchand, Carolin
Köppe, Jeanette
Köster, Helen Ann
Oelmeier, Kathrin
Schmitz, Ralf
Steinhard, Johannes
Fruscalzo, Arrigo
Kubiak, Karol
author_facet Marchand, Carolin
Köppe, Jeanette
Köster, Helen Ann
Oelmeier, Kathrin
Schmitz, Ralf
Steinhard, Johannes
Fruscalzo, Arrigo
Kubiak, Karol
author_sort Marchand, Carolin
collection PubMed
description The aim of this study was to identify growth-restricted fetuses using biometric parameters and to assess the validity and clinical value of individual ultrasound parameters and ratios, such as transcerebellar diameter/abdominal circumference (TCD/AC), head circumference/abdominal circumference (HC/AC), and femur length/abdominal circumference (FL/AC). In a retrospective single-center cross-sectional study, the biometric data of 9292 pregnancies between the 15th and 42nd weeks of gestation were acquired. Statistical analysis included descriptive data, quantile regression estimating the 10th and 90th percentiles, and multivariable analysis. We obtained clinically noticeable results in predicting small-for-gestational-age (SGA) and fetal growth restriction (FGR) fetuses at advanced weeks of gestation using the AC with a Youden index of 0.81 and 0.96, respectively. The other individual parameters and quotients were less suited to identifying cases of SGA and FGR. The multivariable analysis demonstrated the best results for identifying SGA and FGR fetuses with an area under the curve of 0.95 and 0.96, respectively. The individual ultrasound parameters were better suited to identifying SGA and FGR than the ratios. Amongst these, the AC was the most promising individual parameter, especially at advanced weeks of gestation. However, the highest accuracy was achieved with a multivariable model.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9317726
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93177262022-07-27 Fetal Growth Restriction: Comparison of Biometric Parameters Marchand, Carolin Köppe, Jeanette Köster, Helen Ann Oelmeier, Kathrin Schmitz, Ralf Steinhard, Johannes Fruscalzo, Arrigo Kubiak, Karol J Pers Med Article The aim of this study was to identify growth-restricted fetuses using biometric parameters and to assess the validity and clinical value of individual ultrasound parameters and ratios, such as transcerebellar diameter/abdominal circumference (TCD/AC), head circumference/abdominal circumference (HC/AC), and femur length/abdominal circumference (FL/AC). In a retrospective single-center cross-sectional study, the biometric data of 9292 pregnancies between the 15th and 42nd weeks of gestation were acquired. Statistical analysis included descriptive data, quantile regression estimating the 10th and 90th percentiles, and multivariable analysis. We obtained clinically noticeable results in predicting small-for-gestational-age (SGA) and fetal growth restriction (FGR) fetuses at advanced weeks of gestation using the AC with a Youden index of 0.81 and 0.96, respectively. The other individual parameters and quotients were less suited to identifying cases of SGA and FGR. The multivariable analysis demonstrated the best results for identifying SGA and FGR fetuses with an area under the curve of 0.95 and 0.96, respectively. The individual ultrasound parameters were better suited to identifying SGA and FGR than the ratios. Amongst these, the AC was the most promising individual parameter, especially at advanced weeks of gestation. However, the highest accuracy was achieved with a multivariable model. MDPI 2022-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9317726/ /pubmed/35887622 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12071125 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Marchand, Carolin
Köppe, Jeanette
Köster, Helen Ann
Oelmeier, Kathrin
Schmitz, Ralf
Steinhard, Johannes
Fruscalzo, Arrigo
Kubiak, Karol
Fetal Growth Restriction: Comparison of Biometric Parameters
title Fetal Growth Restriction: Comparison of Biometric Parameters
title_full Fetal Growth Restriction: Comparison of Biometric Parameters
title_fullStr Fetal Growth Restriction: Comparison of Biometric Parameters
title_full_unstemmed Fetal Growth Restriction: Comparison of Biometric Parameters
title_short Fetal Growth Restriction: Comparison of Biometric Parameters
title_sort fetal growth restriction: comparison of biometric parameters
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9317726/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35887622
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12071125
work_keys_str_mv AT marchandcarolin fetalgrowthrestrictioncomparisonofbiometricparameters
AT koppejeanette fetalgrowthrestrictioncomparisonofbiometricparameters
AT kosterhelenann fetalgrowthrestrictioncomparisonofbiometricparameters
AT oelmeierkathrin fetalgrowthrestrictioncomparisonofbiometricparameters
AT schmitzralf fetalgrowthrestrictioncomparisonofbiometricparameters
AT steinhardjohannes fetalgrowthrestrictioncomparisonofbiometricparameters
AT fruscalzoarrigo fetalgrowthrestrictioncomparisonofbiometricparameters
AT kubiakkarol fetalgrowthrestrictioncomparisonofbiometricparameters