Cargando…

Intravenous Iron Supplementation for the Treatment of Chemotherapy-Induced Anemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Background: The pathophysiology of cancer-related anemia is multifactorial, including that of chemotherapy-induced anemia (CIA). The guidelines are not consistent in their approach to the use of intravenous (IV) iron in patients with cancer as part of the clinical practice. Materials and methods: Al...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Buchrits, Shira, Itzhaki, Oranit, Avni, Tomer, Raanani, Pia, Gafter-Gvili, Anat
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9317757/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35887920
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11144156
_version_ 1784755134501224448
author Buchrits, Shira
Itzhaki, Oranit
Avni, Tomer
Raanani, Pia
Gafter-Gvili, Anat
author_facet Buchrits, Shira
Itzhaki, Oranit
Avni, Tomer
Raanani, Pia
Gafter-Gvili, Anat
author_sort Buchrits, Shira
collection PubMed
description Background: The pathophysiology of cancer-related anemia is multifactorial, including that of chemotherapy-induced anemia (CIA). The guidelines are not consistent in their approach to the use of intravenous (IV) iron in patients with cancer as part of the clinical practice. Materials and methods: All randomized controlled trials that compared IV iron with either no iron or iron taken orally for the treatment of CIA were included. We excluded trials if erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) were used. The primary outcome was the percentage of patients requiring a red blood cell (RBC) transfusion during the study period. The secondary outcomes included the hematopoietic response (an increase in the Hb level by more than 1 g/dL or an increase above 11 g/dL), the iron parameters and adverse events. For the dichotomous data, risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (Cis) were estimated and pooled. For the continuous data, the mean differences were calculated. A fixed effect model was used, except in the event of significant heterogeneity between the trials (p < 0.10; I(2) > 40%), in which we used a random effects model. Results: A total of 8 trials published between January 1990 and July 2021 that randomized 1015 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Of these, 553 patients were randomized to IV iron and were compared with 271 patients randomized to oral iron and 191 to no iron. IV iron decreased the percentage of patients requiring a blood transfusion compared with oral iron (RR 0.72; 95% CI 0.55–0.95) with a number needed to treat of 20 (95% CI 11–100). IV iron increased the hematopoietic response (RR 1.23; 95% CI 1.01–1.5). There was no difference with respect to the risk of adverse events (RR 0.97; 95% CI 0.88–1.07; 8 trials) or severe adverse events (RR 1.09; 95% CI 0.76–1.57; 8 trials). Conclusions: IV iron resulted in a decrease in the need for RBC transfusions, with no difference in adverse events in patients with CIA. IV iron for the treatment of CIA should be considered in clinical practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9317757
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93177572022-07-27 Intravenous Iron Supplementation for the Treatment of Chemotherapy-Induced Anemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Buchrits, Shira Itzhaki, Oranit Avni, Tomer Raanani, Pia Gafter-Gvili, Anat J Clin Med Review Background: The pathophysiology of cancer-related anemia is multifactorial, including that of chemotherapy-induced anemia (CIA). The guidelines are not consistent in their approach to the use of intravenous (IV) iron in patients with cancer as part of the clinical practice. Materials and methods: All randomized controlled trials that compared IV iron with either no iron or iron taken orally for the treatment of CIA were included. We excluded trials if erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) were used. The primary outcome was the percentage of patients requiring a red blood cell (RBC) transfusion during the study period. The secondary outcomes included the hematopoietic response (an increase in the Hb level by more than 1 g/dL or an increase above 11 g/dL), the iron parameters and adverse events. For the dichotomous data, risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (Cis) were estimated and pooled. For the continuous data, the mean differences were calculated. A fixed effect model was used, except in the event of significant heterogeneity between the trials (p < 0.10; I(2) > 40%), in which we used a random effects model. Results: A total of 8 trials published between January 1990 and July 2021 that randomized 1015 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Of these, 553 patients were randomized to IV iron and were compared with 271 patients randomized to oral iron and 191 to no iron. IV iron decreased the percentage of patients requiring a blood transfusion compared with oral iron (RR 0.72; 95% CI 0.55–0.95) with a number needed to treat of 20 (95% CI 11–100). IV iron increased the hematopoietic response (RR 1.23; 95% CI 1.01–1.5). There was no difference with respect to the risk of adverse events (RR 0.97; 95% CI 0.88–1.07; 8 trials) or severe adverse events (RR 1.09; 95% CI 0.76–1.57; 8 trials). Conclusions: IV iron resulted in a decrease in the need for RBC transfusions, with no difference in adverse events in patients with CIA. IV iron for the treatment of CIA should be considered in clinical practice. MDPI 2022-07-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9317757/ /pubmed/35887920 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11144156 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Buchrits, Shira
Itzhaki, Oranit
Avni, Tomer
Raanani, Pia
Gafter-Gvili, Anat
Intravenous Iron Supplementation for the Treatment of Chemotherapy-Induced Anemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title Intravenous Iron Supplementation for the Treatment of Chemotherapy-Induced Anemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_full Intravenous Iron Supplementation for the Treatment of Chemotherapy-Induced Anemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_fullStr Intravenous Iron Supplementation for the Treatment of Chemotherapy-Induced Anemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_full_unstemmed Intravenous Iron Supplementation for the Treatment of Chemotherapy-Induced Anemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_short Intravenous Iron Supplementation for the Treatment of Chemotherapy-Induced Anemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_sort intravenous iron supplementation for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced anemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9317757/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35887920
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11144156
work_keys_str_mv AT buchritsshira intravenousironsupplementationforthetreatmentofchemotherapyinducedanemiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT itzhakioranit intravenousironsupplementationforthetreatmentofchemotherapyinducedanemiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT avnitomer intravenousironsupplementationforthetreatmentofchemotherapyinducedanemiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT raananipia intravenousironsupplementationforthetreatmentofchemotherapyinducedanemiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT gaftergvilianat intravenousironsupplementationforthetreatmentofchemotherapyinducedanemiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials