Cargando…
Impella versus Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Acute Myocardial Infarction Cardiogenic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Objectives: Despite an increase in the use of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices for acute myocardial infarction cardiogenic shock (AMI-CS), there is currently no randomised data directly comparing the use of Impella and veno-arterial extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO). Methods...
Autores principales: | Batchelor, Riley J., Wheelahan, Andrew, Zheng, Wayne C., Stub, Dion, Yang, Yang, Chan, William |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9317942/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35887718 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11143955 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Clinical Pearls of Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Cardiogenic Shock
por: Choi, Min Suk, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
The challenges of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock
por: Michael, Charlesworth, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Comparison of mechanical circulatory support with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation or Impella for patients with cardiogenic shock: a propensity-matched analysis
por: Karatolios, Konstantinos, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Combined Venoarterial ECMO and Impella-CP Circulatory Support for Cardiogenic Shock Due to Papillary Muscle Rupture
por: Ekanem, Emmanuel, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Survival following venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation
in postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock adults
por: Chen, Fei, et al.
Publicado: (2020)