Cargando…

Juror decision-making regarding a defendant diagnosed with borderline personality disorder

Stigma is an established consequence of the Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) diagnosis. This diagnosis is subject to revision in the International Classification of Diseases–11th Revision (ICD–11). Using the legal issue of diminished responsibility, this study applied an experimental mock-jury...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baker, James, Edwards, Ian, Beazley, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Routledge 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9318233/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35903499
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2021.1938273
_version_ 1784755241310224384
author Baker, James
Edwards, Ian
Beazley, Peter
author_facet Baker, James
Edwards, Ian
Beazley, Peter
author_sort Baker, James
collection PubMed
description Stigma is an established consequence of the Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) diagnosis. This diagnosis is subject to revision in the International Classification of Diseases–11th Revision (ICD–11). Using the legal issue of diminished responsibility, this study applied an experimental mock-jury methodology to explore the impact of diagnostic stigma of BPD on jury decision-making. Participants were allocated to one of two versions of a simplified fictitious homicide trial. The group whose defendant was described as having a ‘severe personality disorder, borderline pattern’ rated the defendant as more dangerous, and more in need of segregation and coercive treatment, than controls where the defendant was described as having a ‘complex mental health problem’. Between-group differences in other measures, including the decision to agree a verdict of diminished responsibility, were not found. The ICD-11 ‘severe personality disorder, borderline pattern’ diagnosis may adversely impact the attitudes of jurors considering the question of diminished responsibility.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9318233
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Routledge
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93182332022-07-27 Juror decision-making regarding a defendant diagnosed with borderline personality disorder Baker, James Edwards, Ian Beazley, Peter Psychiatr Psychol Law Articles Stigma is an established consequence of the Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) diagnosis. This diagnosis is subject to revision in the International Classification of Diseases–11th Revision (ICD–11). Using the legal issue of diminished responsibility, this study applied an experimental mock-jury methodology to explore the impact of diagnostic stigma of BPD on jury decision-making. Participants were allocated to one of two versions of a simplified fictitious homicide trial. The group whose defendant was described as having a ‘severe personality disorder, borderline pattern’ rated the defendant as more dangerous, and more in need of segregation and coercive treatment, than controls where the defendant was described as having a ‘complex mental health problem’. Between-group differences in other measures, including the decision to agree a verdict of diminished responsibility, were not found. The ICD-11 ‘severe personality disorder, borderline pattern’ diagnosis may adversely impact the attitudes of jurors considering the question of diminished responsibility. Routledge 2021-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9318233/ /pubmed/35903499 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2021.1938273 Text en © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way.
spellingShingle Articles
Baker, James
Edwards, Ian
Beazley, Peter
Juror decision-making regarding a defendant diagnosed with borderline personality disorder
title Juror decision-making regarding a defendant diagnosed with borderline personality disorder
title_full Juror decision-making regarding a defendant diagnosed with borderline personality disorder
title_fullStr Juror decision-making regarding a defendant diagnosed with borderline personality disorder
title_full_unstemmed Juror decision-making regarding a defendant diagnosed with borderline personality disorder
title_short Juror decision-making regarding a defendant diagnosed with borderline personality disorder
title_sort juror decision-making regarding a defendant diagnosed with borderline personality disorder
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9318233/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35903499
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2021.1938273
work_keys_str_mv AT bakerjames jurordecisionmakingregardingadefendantdiagnosedwithborderlinepersonalitydisorder
AT edwardsian jurordecisionmakingregardingadefendantdiagnosedwithborderlinepersonalitydisorder
AT beazleypeter jurordecisionmakingregardingadefendantdiagnosedwithborderlinepersonalitydisorder