Cargando…
Juror decision-making regarding a defendant diagnosed with borderline personality disorder
Stigma is an established consequence of the Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) diagnosis. This diagnosis is subject to revision in the International Classification of Diseases–11th Revision (ICD–11). Using the legal issue of diminished responsibility, this study applied an experimental mock-jury...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Routledge
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9318233/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35903499 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2021.1938273 |
_version_ | 1784755241310224384 |
---|---|
author | Baker, James Edwards, Ian Beazley, Peter |
author_facet | Baker, James Edwards, Ian Beazley, Peter |
author_sort | Baker, James |
collection | PubMed |
description | Stigma is an established consequence of the Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) diagnosis. This diagnosis is subject to revision in the International Classification of Diseases–11th Revision (ICD–11). Using the legal issue of diminished responsibility, this study applied an experimental mock-jury methodology to explore the impact of diagnostic stigma of BPD on jury decision-making. Participants were allocated to one of two versions of a simplified fictitious homicide trial. The group whose defendant was described as having a ‘severe personality disorder, borderline pattern’ rated the defendant as more dangerous, and more in need of segregation and coercive treatment, than controls where the defendant was described as having a ‘complex mental health problem’. Between-group differences in other measures, including the decision to agree a verdict of diminished responsibility, were not found. The ICD-11 ‘severe personality disorder, borderline pattern’ diagnosis may adversely impact the attitudes of jurors considering the question of diminished responsibility. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9318233 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Routledge |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93182332022-07-27 Juror decision-making regarding a defendant diagnosed with borderline personality disorder Baker, James Edwards, Ian Beazley, Peter Psychiatr Psychol Law Articles Stigma is an established consequence of the Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) diagnosis. This diagnosis is subject to revision in the International Classification of Diseases–11th Revision (ICD–11). Using the legal issue of diminished responsibility, this study applied an experimental mock-jury methodology to explore the impact of diagnostic stigma of BPD on jury decision-making. Participants were allocated to one of two versions of a simplified fictitious homicide trial. The group whose defendant was described as having a ‘severe personality disorder, borderline pattern’ rated the defendant as more dangerous, and more in need of segregation and coercive treatment, than controls where the defendant was described as having a ‘complex mental health problem’. Between-group differences in other measures, including the decision to agree a verdict of diminished responsibility, were not found. The ICD-11 ‘severe personality disorder, borderline pattern’ diagnosis may adversely impact the attitudes of jurors considering the question of diminished responsibility. Routledge 2021-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9318233/ /pubmed/35903499 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2021.1938273 Text en © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way. |
spellingShingle | Articles Baker, James Edwards, Ian Beazley, Peter Juror decision-making regarding a defendant diagnosed with borderline personality disorder |
title | Juror decision-making regarding a defendant diagnosed with borderline personality disorder |
title_full | Juror decision-making regarding a defendant diagnosed with borderline personality disorder |
title_fullStr | Juror decision-making regarding a defendant diagnosed with borderline personality disorder |
title_full_unstemmed | Juror decision-making regarding a defendant diagnosed with borderline personality disorder |
title_short | Juror decision-making regarding a defendant diagnosed with borderline personality disorder |
title_sort | juror decision-making regarding a defendant diagnosed with borderline personality disorder |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9318233/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35903499 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2021.1938273 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bakerjames jurordecisionmakingregardingadefendantdiagnosedwithborderlinepersonalitydisorder AT edwardsian jurordecisionmakingregardingadefendantdiagnosedwithborderlinepersonalitydisorder AT beazleypeter jurordecisionmakingregardingadefendantdiagnosedwithborderlinepersonalitydisorder |