Cargando…

Validation of Vectra 3D Imaging Systems: A Review

Aim: Three-dimensional facial imaging systems are a useful tool that is gradually replacing two-dimensional imaging and traditional anthropometry with calipers. In this varied and growing landscape of new devices, Canfield (Canfield Scientific, Parsippany, NJ, USA) has proposed a series of static an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: De Stefani, Alberto, Barone, Martina, Hatami Alamdari, Sam, Barjami, Arjola, Baciliero, Ugo, Apolloni, Federico, Gracco, Antonio, Bruno, Giovanni
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9318949/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35886670
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19148820
_version_ 1784755428975968256
author De Stefani, Alberto
Barone, Martina
Hatami Alamdari, Sam
Barjami, Arjola
Baciliero, Ugo
Apolloni, Federico
Gracco, Antonio
Bruno, Giovanni
author_facet De Stefani, Alberto
Barone, Martina
Hatami Alamdari, Sam
Barjami, Arjola
Baciliero, Ugo
Apolloni, Federico
Gracco, Antonio
Bruno, Giovanni
author_sort De Stefani, Alberto
collection PubMed
description Aim: Three-dimensional facial imaging systems are a useful tool that is gradually replacing two-dimensional imaging and traditional anthropometry with calipers. In this varied and growing landscape of new devices, Canfield (Canfield Scientific, Parsippany, NJ, USA) has proposed a series of static and portable 3D imaging systems. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the current literature regarding the validation of Canfield’s Vectra imaging systems. Materials and Methods: A search strategy was developed on electronic databases including PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus by using specific keywords. After the study selection phase, a total of 10 articles were included in the present review. Results: A total of 10 articles were finally included in the present review. For six articles, we conducted a validation of the Vectra static devices, focusing especially on the Vectra M5, Vectra M3 and Vectra XT. For four articles, we validated the Vectra H1 portable system. Conclusions: All of the reviewed articles concluded that Canfield’s Vectra 3D imaging systems are capable of capturing accurate and reproducible stereophotogrammetric images. Minor errors were reported, particularly in the acquisition of the perioral region, but all the evaluated devices are considered to be valid and accurate tools for clinicians.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9318949
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93189492022-07-27 Validation of Vectra 3D Imaging Systems: A Review De Stefani, Alberto Barone, Martina Hatami Alamdari, Sam Barjami, Arjola Baciliero, Ugo Apolloni, Federico Gracco, Antonio Bruno, Giovanni Int J Environ Res Public Health Review Aim: Three-dimensional facial imaging systems are a useful tool that is gradually replacing two-dimensional imaging and traditional anthropometry with calipers. In this varied and growing landscape of new devices, Canfield (Canfield Scientific, Parsippany, NJ, USA) has proposed a series of static and portable 3D imaging systems. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the current literature regarding the validation of Canfield’s Vectra imaging systems. Materials and Methods: A search strategy was developed on electronic databases including PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus by using specific keywords. After the study selection phase, a total of 10 articles were included in the present review. Results: A total of 10 articles were finally included in the present review. For six articles, we conducted a validation of the Vectra static devices, focusing especially on the Vectra M5, Vectra M3 and Vectra XT. For four articles, we validated the Vectra H1 portable system. Conclusions: All of the reviewed articles concluded that Canfield’s Vectra 3D imaging systems are capable of capturing accurate and reproducible stereophotogrammetric images. Minor errors were reported, particularly in the acquisition of the perioral region, but all the evaluated devices are considered to be valid and accurate tools for clinicians. MDPI 2022-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9318949/ /pubmed/35886670 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19148820 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
De Stefani, Alberto
Barone, Martina
Hatami Alamdari, Sam
Barjami, Arjola
Baciliero, Ugo
Apolloni, Federico
Gracco, Antonio
Bruno, Giovanni
Validation of Vectra 3D Imaging Systems: A Review
title Validation of Vectra 3D Imaging Systems: A Review
title_full Validation of Vectra 3D Imaging Systems: A Review
title_fullStr Validation of Vectra 3D Imaging Systems: A Review
title_full_unstemmed Validation of Vectra 3D Imaging Systems: A Review
title_short Validation of Vectra 3D Imaging Systems: A Review
title_sort validation of vectra 3d imaging systems: a review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9318949/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35886670
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19148820
work_keys_str_mv AT destefanialberto validationofvectra3dimagingsystemsareview
AT baronemartina validationofvectra3dimagingsystemsareview
AT hatamialamdarisam validationofvectra3dimagingsystemsareview
AT barjamiarjola validationofvectra3dimagingsystemsareview
AT bacilierougo validationofvectra3dimagingsystemsareview
AT apollonifederico validationofvectra3dimagingsystemsareview
AT graccoantonio validationofvectra3dimagingsystemsareview
AT brunogiovanni validationofvectra3dimagingsystemsareview