Cargando…

COVID-19 Intensive Care—Evaluation of Public Information Sources and Current Standards of Care in German Intensive Care Units: A Cross Sectional Online Survey on Intensive Care Staff in Germany

Backround: In February 2021, the first formal evidence and consensus-based (S3) guidelines for the inpatient treatment of patients with COVID-19 were published in Germany and have been updated twice during 2021. The aim of the present study is to re-evaluate the dissemination pathways and strategies...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Werner, Anne, Popp, Maria, Fichtner, Falk, Holzmann-Littig, Christopher, Kranke, Peter, Steckelberg, Anke, Lühnen, Julia, Redlich, Lisa Marie, Dickel, Steffen, Grimm, Clemens, Moerer, Onnen, Nothacker, Monika, Seeber, Christian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9319015/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35885841
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10071315
_version_ 1784755445674541056
author Werner, Anne
Popp, Maria
Fichtner, Falk
Holzmann-Littig, Christopher
Kranke, Peter
Steckelberg, Anke
Lühnen, Julia
Redlich, Lisa Marie
Dickel, Steffen
Grimm, Clemens
Moerer, Onnen
Nothacker, Monika
Seeber, Christian
author_facet Werner, Anne
Popp, Maria
Fichtner, Falk
Holzmann-Littig, Christopher
Kranke, Peter
Steckelberg, Anke
Lühnen, Julia
Redlich, Lisa Marie
Dickel, Steffen
Grimm, Clemens
Moerer, Onnen
Nothacker, Monika
Seeber, Christian
author_sort Werner, Anne
collection PubMed
description Backround: In February 2021, the first formal evidence and consensus-based (S3) guidelines for the inpatient treatment of patients with COVID-19 were published in Germany and have been updated twice during 2021. The aim of the present study is to re-evaluate the dissemination pathways and strategies for ICU staff (first evaluation in December 2020 when previous versions of consensus-based guidelines (S2k) were published) and question selected aspects of guideline adherence of standard care for patients with COVID-19 in the ICU. Methods: We conducted an anonymous online survey among German intensive care staff from 11 October 2021 to 11 November 2021. We distributed the survey via e-mail in intensive care facilities and requested redirection to additional intensive care staff (snowball sampling). Results: There was a difference between the professional groups in the number, selection and qualitative assessment of information sources about COVID-19. Standard operating procedures were most frequently used by all occupational groups and received a high quality rating. Physicians preferred sources for active information search (e.g., medical journals), while nurses predominantly used passive consumable sources (e.g., every-day media). Despite differences in usage behaviour, the sources were rated similarly in terms of the quality of the information on COVID-19. The trusted organizations have not changed over time. The use of guidelines was frequently stated and highly recommended. The majority of the participants reported guideline-compliant treatment. Nevertheless, there were certain variations in the use of medication as well as the criteria chosen for discontinuing non-invasive ventilation (NIV) compared to guideline recommendations. Conclusions: An adequate external source of information for nursing staff is lacking, the usual sources of physicians are only appropriate for the minority of nursing staff. The self-reported use of guidelines is high.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9319015
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93190152022-07-27 COVID-19 Intensive Care—Evaluation of Public Information Sources and Current Standards of Care in German Intensive Care Units: A Cross Sectional Online Survey on Intensive Care Staff in Germany Werner, Anne Popp, Maria Fichtner, Falk Holzmann-Littig, Christopher Kranke, Peter Steckelberg, Anke Lühnen, Julia Redlich, Lisa Marie Dickel, Steffen Grimm, Clemens Moerer, Onnen Nothacker, Monika Seeber, Christian Healthcare (Basel) Article Backround: In February 2021, the first formal evidence and consensus-based (S3) guidelines for the inpatient treatment of patients with COVID-19 were published in Germany and have been updated twice during 2021. The aim of the present study is to re-evaluate the dissemination pathways and strategies for ICU staff (first evaluation in December 2020 when previous versions of consensus-based guidelines (S2k) were published) and question selected aspects of guideline adherence of standard care for patients with COVID-19 in the ICU. Methods: We conducted an anonymous online survey among German intensive care staff from 11 October 2021 to 11 November 2021. We distributed the survey via e-mail in intensive care facilities and requested redirection to additional intensive care staff (snowball sampling). Results: There was a difference between the professional groups in the number, selection and qualitative assessment of information sources about COVID-19. Standard operating procedures were most frequently used by all occupational groups and received a high quality rating. Physicians preferred sources for active information search (e.g., medical journals), while nurses predominantly used passive consumable sources (e.g., every-day media). Despite differences in usage behaviour, the sources were rated similarly in terms of the quality of the information on COVID-19. The trusted organizations have not changed over time. The use of guidelines was frequently stated and highly recommended. The majority of the participants reported guideline-compliant treatment. Nevertheless, there were certain variations in the use of medication as well as the criteria chosen for discontinuing non-invasive ventilation (NIV) compared to guideline recommendations. Conclusions: An adequate external source of information for nursing staff is lacking, the usual sources of physicians are only appropriate for the minority of nursing staff. The self-reported use of guidelines is high. MDPI 2022-07-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9319015/ /pubmed/35885841 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10071315 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Werner, Anne
Popp, Maria
Fichtner, Falk
Holzmann-Littig, Christopher
Kranke, Peter
Steckelberg, Anke
Lühnen, Julia
Redlich, Lisa Marie
Dickel, Steffen
Grimm, Clemens
Moerer, Onnen
Nothacker, Monika
Seeber, Christian
COVID-19 Intensive Care—Evaluation of Public Information Sources and Current Standards of Care in German Intensive Care Units: A Cross Sectional Online Survey on Intensive Care Staff in Germany
title COVID-19 Intensive Care—Evaluation of Public Information Sources and Current Standards of Care in German Intensive Care Units: A Cross Sectional Online Survey on Intensive Care Staff in Germany
title_full COVID-19 Intensive Care—Evaluation of Public Information Sources and Current Standards of Care in German Intensive Care Units: A Cross Sectional Online Survey on Intensive Care Staff in Germany
title_fullStr COVID-19 Intensive Care—Evaluation of Public Information Sources and Current Standards of Care in German Intensive Care Units: A Cross Sectional Online Survey on Intensive Care Staff in Germany
title_full_unstemmed COVID-19 Intensive Care—Evaluation of Public Information Sources and Current Standards of Care in German Intensive Care Units: A Cross Sectional Online Survey on Intensive Care Staff in Germany
title_short COVID-19 Intensive Care—Evaluation of Public Information Sources and Current Standards of Care in German Intensive Care Units: A Cross Sectional Online Survey on Intensive Care Staff in Germany
title_sort covid-19 intensive care—evaluation of public information sources and current standards of care in german intensive care units: a cross sectional online survey on intensive care staff in germany
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9319015/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35885841
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10071315
work_keys_str_mv AT werneranne covid19intensivecareevaluationofpublicinformationsourcesandcurrentstandardsofcareingermanintensivecareunitsacrosssectionalonlinesurveyonintensivecarestaffingermany
AT poppmaria covid19intensivecareevaluationofpublicinformationsourcesandcurrentstandardsofcareingermanintensivecareunitsacrosssectionalonlinesurveyonintensivecarestaffingermany
AT fichtnerfalk covid19intensivecareevaluationofpublicinformationsourcesandcurrentstandardsofcareingermanintensivecareunitsacrosssectionalonlinesurveyonintensivecarestaffingermany
AT holzmannlittigchristopher covid19intensivecareevaluationofpublicinformationsourcesandcurrentstandardsofcareingermanintensivecareunitsacrosssectionalonlinesurveyonintensivecarestaffingermany
AT krankepeter covid19intensivecareevaluationofpublicinformationsourcesandcurrentstandardsofcareingermanintensivecareunitsacrosssectionalonlinesurveyonintensivecarestaffingermany
AT steckelberganke covid19intensivecareevaluationofpublicinformationsourcesandcurrentstandardsofcareingermanintensivecareunitsacrosssectionalonlinesurveyonintensivecarestaffingermany
AT luhnenjulia covid19intensivecareevaluationofpublicinformationsourcesandcurrentstandardsofcareingermanintensivecareunitsacrosssectionalonlinesurveyonintensivecarestaffingermany
AT redlichlisamarie covid19intensivecareevaluationofpublicinformationsourcesandcurrentstandardsofcareingermanintensivecareunitsacrosssectionalonlinesurveyonintensivecarestaffingermany
AT dickelsteffen covid19intensivecareevaluationofpublicinformationsourcesandcurrentstandardsofcareingermanintensivecareunitsacrosssectionalonlinesurveyonintensivecarestaffingermany
AT grimmclemens covid19intensivecareevaluationofpublicinformationsourcesandcurrentstandardsofcareingermanintensivecareunitsacrosssectionalonlinesurveyonintensivecarestaffingermany
AT moereronnen covid19intensivecareevaluationofpublicinformationsourcesandcurrentstandardsofcareingermanintensivecareunitsacrosssectionalonlinesurveyonintensivecarestaffingermany
AT nothackermonika covid19intensivecareevaluationofpublicinformationsourcesandcurrentstandardsofcareingermanintensivecareunitsacrosssectionalonlinesurveyonintensivecarestaffingermany
AT seeberchristian covid19intensivecareevaluationofpublicinformationsourcesandcurrentstandardsofcareingermanintensivecareunitsacrosssectionalonlinesurveyonintensivecarestaffingermany