Cargando…

Detecting Sepsis in Patients with Severe Subarachnoid Hemorrhage during Critical Care

Introduction: Sepsis and septic shock continue to have a very high mortality rate. Therefore, the last consensus-based sepsis guideline introduced the sepsis related organ failure assessment (SOFA) score to ensure a rapid diagnosis and treatment of sepsis. In neurosurgical patients, especially those...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Flinspach, Armin Niklas, Konczalla, Jürgen, Seifert, Volker, Zacharowski, Kai, Herrmann, Eva, Balaban, Ümniye, Adam, Elisabeth Hannah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9319068/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35887994
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11144229
_version_ 1784755458902327296
author Flinspach, Armin Niklas
Konczalla, Jürgen
Seifert, Volker
Zacharowski, Kai
Herrmann, Eva
Balaban, Ümniye
Adam, Elisabeth Hannah
author_facet Flinspach, Armin Niklas
Konczalla, Jürgen
Seifert, Volker
Zacharowski, Kai
Herrmann, Eva
Balaban, Ümniye
Adam, Elisabeth Hannah
author_sort Flinspach, Armin Niklas
collection PubMed
description Introduction: Sepsis and septic shock continue to have a very high mortality rate. Therefore, the last consensus-based sepsis guideline introduced the sepsis related organ failure assessment (SOFA) score to ensure a rapid diagnosis and treatment of sepsis. In neurosurgical patients, especially those patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), there are considerable difficulties in interpreting the SOFA score. Therefore, our study was designed to evaluate the applicability of the SOFA for critical care patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage. Methods: Our retrospective monocentric study was registered (NCT05246969) and approved by the local ethics committee (# 211/18). Patients admitted to the Department of Neurosurgery at the Frankfurt University Hospital were enrolled during the study period. Results: We included 57 patients with 85 sepsis episodes of which 141 patients had SOFA score-positive results and 243 SIRS positive detections. We failed to detect a correlation between the clinical diagnosis of sepsis and positive SOFA or SIRS scores. Moreover, a significant proportion of sepsis that was incorrectly detected via the SOFA score could be attributed to cerebral vasospasms (p < 0.01) or a decrease in Glasgow Coma Scale (p < 0.01). Similarly, a positive SIRS score was often not attributed to a septic episode (49.0%). Discussion: Regardless of the fact that SAH is a rare disease, the relevance of sepsis detection should be given special attention in light of the long duration of therapy and sepsis prevalence. Among the six modules represented by the SOFA score, two highly modules were practically eliminated. However, to enable early diagnosis of sepsis, the investigator’s clinical views and synopsis of various scores and laboratory parameters should be highlighted. Conclusions: In special patient populations, such as in critically ill SAH patients, the SOFA score can be limited regarding its applicability. In particular, it is very important to differentiate between CVS and sepsis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9319068
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93190682022-07-27 Detecting Sepsis in Patients with Severe Subarachnoid Hemorrhage during Critical Care Flinspach, Armin Niklas Konczalla, Jürgen Seifert, Volker Zacharowski, Kai Herrmann, Eva Balaban, Ümniye Adam, Elisabeth Hannah J Clin Med Article Introduction: Sepsis and septic shock continue to have a very high mortality rate. Therefore, the last consensus-based sepsis guideline introduced the sepsis related organ failure assessment (SOFA) score to ensure a rapid diagnosis and treatment of sepsis. In neurosurgical patients, especially those patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), there are considerable difficulties in interpreting the SOFA score. Therefore, our study was designed to evaluate the applicability of the SOFA for critical care patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage. Methods: Our retrospective monocentric study was registered (NCT05246969) and approved by the local ethics committee (# 211/18). Patients admitted to the Department of Neurosurgery at the Frankfurt University Hospital were enrolled during the study period. Results: We included 57 patients with 85 sepsis episodes of which 141 patients had SOFA score-positive results and 243 SIRS positive detections. We failed to detect a correlation between the clinical diagnosis of sepsis and positive SOFA or SIRS scores. Moreover, a significant proportion of sepsis that was incorrectly detected via the SOFA score could be attributed to cerebral vasospasms (p < 0.01) or a decrease in Glasgow Coma Scale (p < 0.01). Similarly, a positive SIRS score was often not attributed to a septic episode (49.0%). Discussion: Regardless of the fact that SAH is a rare disease, the relevance of sepsis detection should be given special attention in light of the long duration of therapy and sepsis prevalence. Among the six modules represented by the SOFA score, two highly modules were practically eliminated. However, to enable early diagnosis of sepsis, the investigator’s clinical views and synopsis of various scores and laboratory parameters should be highlighted. Conclusions: In special patient populations, such as in critically ill SAH patients, the SOFA score can be limited regarding its applicability. In particular, it is very important to differentiate between CVS and sepsis. MDPI 2022-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9319068/ /pubmed/35887994 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11144229 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Flinspach, Armin Niklas
Konczalla, Jürgen
Seifert, Volker
Zacharowski, Kai
Herrmann, Eva
Balaban, Ümniye
Adam, Elisabeth Hannah
Detecting Sepsis in Patients with Severe Subarachnoid Hemorrhage during Critical Care
title Detecting Sepsis in Patients with Severe Subarachnoid Hemorrhage during Critical Care
title_full Detecting Sepsis in Patients with Severe Subarachnoid Hemorrhage during Critical Care
title_fullStr Detecting Sepsis in Patients with Severe Subarachnoid Hemorrhage during Critical Care
title_full_unstemmed Detecting Sepsis in Patients with Severe Subarachnoid Hemorrhage during Critical Care
title_short Detecting Sepsis in Patients with Severe Subarachnoid Hemorrhage during Critical Care
title_sort detecting sepsis in patients with severe subarachnoid hemorrhage during critical care
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9319068/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35887994
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11144229
work_keys_str_mv AT flinspacharminniklas detectingsepsisinpatientswithseveresubarachnoidhemorrhageduringcriticalcare
AT konczallajurgen detectingsepsisinpatientswithseveresubarachnoidhemorrhageduringcriticalcare
AT seifertvolker detectingsepsisinpatientswithseveresubarachnoidhemorrhageduringcriticalcare
AT zacharowskikai detectingsepsisinpatientswithseveresubarachnoidhemorrhageduringcriticalcare
AT herrmanneva detectingsepsisinpatientswithseveresubarachnoidhemorrhageduringcriticalcare
AT balabanumniye detectingsepsisinpatientswithseveresubarachnoidhemorrhageduringcriticalcare
AT adamelisabethhannah detectingsepsisinpatientswithseveresubarachnoidhemorrhageduringcriticalcare