Cargando…
An analysis of the significance of the lymph node ratio and extracapsular involvement in the prognosis of endometrial cancer patients
INTRODUCTION: The primary aim of our study was to analyse the impact of the lymph node ratio (LNR) and extracapsular involvement (ECI) on the prognosis of endometrial cancer (EC) patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We carried out a retrospective analysis of 886 patients surgically treated for EC between...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Termedia Publishing House
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9319184/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35903209 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/wo.2022.118243 |
_version_ | 1784755487647989760 |
---|---|
author | Gorzelnik, Katarzyna Szubert, Sebastian Knafel, Anna Wójcikiewicz, Anna Nowakowski, Błażej Koper, Krzysztof Wicherek, Łukasz |
author_facet | Gorzelnik, Katarzyna Szubert, Sebastian Knafel, Anna Wójcikiewicz, Anna Nowakowski, Błażej Koper, Krzysztof Wicherek, Łukasz |
author_sort | Gorzelnik, Katarzyna |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The primary aim of our study was to analyse the impact of the lymph node ratio (LNR) and extracapsular involvement (ECI) on the prognosis of endometrial cancer (EC) patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We carried out a retrospective analysis of 886 patients surgically treated for EC between 2000 and 2015. In the subgroup of patients with lymph node metastases (LNM), we evaluated the impact of the number and localization of the LNM, LNR, and ECI on patients’ overall survival (OS). RESULTS: In the group of patients with LNM, 0.3 was the optimal LNR cut-off for differentiating between short- and long-term survivors [HR = 2.94 (95% CI: 1.49–5.80)]. Patients with a LNR ≥ 0.3 had a significantly shorter OS period (35.0 months, range 0.2–175 months) compared to patients with a LNR < 0.3 [median OS – mOS, was 143, range 15–169 months; (p = 0.003]. We observed significant differences in the mOS of EC patients without LNM compared to patients with LNM, as well as those with both LNM and ECI (p < 0.0001). In the group of patients with LNM, we also found that a poorer prognosis depended on the extension of the primary tumour. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that when LNM are found, the long-term outcomes of EC patients are worse in those who have a LNR ≥ 0.3, the presence of ECI, and a more advanced extension of the primary tumour. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9319184 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Termedia Publishing House |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93191842022-07-27 An analysis of the significance of the lymph node ratio and extracapsular involvement in the prognosis of endometrial cancer patients Gorzelnik, Katarzyna Szubert, Sebastian Knafel, Anna Wójcikiewicz, Anna Nowakowski, Błażej Koper, Krzysztof Wicherek, Łukasz Contemp Oncol (Pozn) Original Paper INTRODUCTION: The primary aim of our study was to analyse the impact of the lymph node ratio (LNR) and extracapsular involvement (ECI) on the prognosis of endometrial cancer (EC) patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We carried out a retrospective analysis of 886 patients surgically treated for EC between 2000 and 2015. In the subgroup of patients with lymph node metastases (LNM), we evaluated the impact of the number and localization of the LNM, LNR, and ECI on patients’ overall survival (OS). RESULTS: In the group of patients with LNM, 0.3 was the optimal LNR cut-off for differentiating between short- and long-term survivors [HR = 2.94 (95% CI: 1.49–5.80)]. Patients with a LNR ≥ 0.3 had a significantly shorter OS period (35.0 months, range 0.2–175 months) compared to patients with a LNR < 0.3 [median OS – mOS, was 143, range 15–169 months; (p = 0.003]. We observed significant differences in the mOS of EC patients without LNM compared to patients with LNM, as well as those with both LNM and ECI (p < 0.0001). In the group of patients with LNM, we also found that a poorer prognosis depended on the extension of the primary tumour. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that when LNM are found, the long-term outcomes of EC patients are worse in those who have a LNR ≥ 0.3, the presence of ECI, and a more advanced extension of the primary tumour. Termedia Publishing House 2022-06-30 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9319184/ /pubmed/35903209 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/wo.2022.118243 Text en Copyright © 2022 Termedia https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/) ) |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Gorzelnik, Katarzyna Szubert, Sebastian Knafel, Anna Wójcikiewicz, Anna Nowakowski, Błażej Koper, Krzysztof Wicherek, Łukasz An analysis of the significance of the lymph node ratio and extracapsular involvement in the prognosis of endometrial cancer patients |
title | An analysis of the significance of the lymph node ratio and extracapsular involvement in the prognosis of endometrial cancer patients |
title_full | An analysis of the significance of the lymph node ratio and extracapsular involvement in the prognosis of endometrial cancer patients |
title_fullStr | An analysis of the significance of the lymph node ratio and extracapsular involvement in the prognosis of endometrial cancer patients |
title_full_unstemmed | An analysis of the significance of the lymph node ratio and extracapsular involvement in the prognosis of endometrial cancer patients |
title_short | An analysis of the significance of the lymph node ratio and extracapsular involvement in the prognosis of endometrial cancer patients |
title_sort | analysis of the significance of the lymph node ratio and extracapsular involvement in the prognosis of endometrial cancer patients |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9319184/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35903209 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/wo.2022.118243 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gorzelnikkatarzyna ananalysisofthesignificanceofthelymphnoderatioandextracapsularinvolvementintheprognosisofendometrialcancerpatients AT szubertsebastian ananalysisofthesignificanceofthelymphnoderatioandextracapsularinvolvementintheprognosisofendometrialcancerpatients AT knafelanna ananalysisofthesignificanceofthelymphnoderatioandextracapsularinvolvementintheprognosisofendometrialcancerpatients AT wojcikiewiczanna ananalysisofthesignificanceofthelymphnoderatioandextracapsularinvolvementintheprognosisofendometrialcancerpatients AT nowakowskibłazej ananalysisofthesignificanceofthelymphnoderatioandextracapsularinvolvementintheprognosisofendometrialcancerpatients AT koperkrzysztof ananalysisofthesignificanceofthelymphnoderatioandextracapsularinvolvementintheprognosisofendometrialcancerpatients AT wicherekłukasz ananalysisofthesignificanceofthelymphnoderatioandextracapsularinvolvementintheprognosisofendometrialcancerpatients AT gorzelnikkatarzyna analysisofthesignificanceofthelymphnoderatioandextracapsularinvolvementintheprognosisofendometrialcancerpatients AT szubertsebastian analysisofthesignificanceofthelymphnoderatioandextracapsularinvolvementintheprognosisofendometrialcancerpatients AT knafelanna analysisofthesignificanceofthelymphnoderatioandextracapsularinvolvementintheprognosisofendometrialcancerpatients AT wojcikiewiczanna analysisofthesignificanceofthelymphnoderatioandextracapsularinvolvementintheprognosisofendometrialcancerpatients AT nowakowskibłazej analysisofthesignificanceofthelymphnoderatioandextracapsularinvolvementintheprognosisofendometrialcancerpatients AT koperkrzysztof analysisofthesignificanceofthelymphnoderatioandextracapsularinvolvementintheprognosisofendometrialcancerpatients AT wicherekłukasz analysisofthesignificanceofthelymphnoderatioandextracapsularinvolvementintheprognosisofendometrialcancerpatients |