Cargando…

An analysis of the significance of the lymph node ratio and extracapsular involvement in the prognosis of endometrial cancer patients

INTRODUCTION: The primary aim of our study was to analyse the impact of the lymph node ratio (LNR) and extracapsular involvement (ECI) on the prognosis of endometrial cancer (EC) patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We carried out a retrospective analysis of 886 patients surgically treated for EC between...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gorzelnik, Katarzyna, Szubert, Sebastian, Knafel, Anna, Wójcikiewicz, Anna, Nowakowski, Błażej, Koper, Krzysztof, Wicherek, Łukasz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Termedia Publishing House 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9319184/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35903209
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/wo.2022.118243
_version_ 1784755487647989760
author Gorzelnik, Katarzyna
Szubert, Sebastian
Knafel, Anna
Wójcikiewicz, Anna
Nowakowski, Błażej
Koper, Krzysztof
Wicherek, Łukasz
author_facet Gorzelnik, Katarzyna
Szubert, Sebastian
Knafel, Anna
Wójcikiewicz, Anna
Nowakowski, Błażej
Koper, Krzysztof
Wicherek, Łukasz
author_sort Gorzelnik, Katarzyna
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The primary aim of our study was to analyse the impact of the lymph node ratio (LNR) and extracapsular involvement (ECI) on the prognosis of endometrial cancer (EC) patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We carried out a retrospective analysis of 886 patients surgically treated for EC between 2000 and 2015. In the subgroup of patients with lymph node metastases (LNM), we evaluated the impact of the number and localization of the LNM, LNR, and ECI on patients’ overall survival (OS). RESULTS: In the group of patients with LNM, 0.3 was the optimal LNR cut-off for differentiating between short- and long-term survivors [HR = 2.94 (95% CI: 1.49–5.80)]. Patients with a LNR ≥ 0.3 had a significantly shorter OS period (35.0 months, range 0.2–175 months) compared to patients with a LNR < 0.3 [median OS – mOS, was 143, range 15–169 months; (p = 0.003]. We observed significant differences in the mOS of EC patients without LNM compared to patients with LNM, as well as those with both LNM and ECI (p < 0.0001). In the group of patients with LNM, we also found that a poorer prognosis depended on the extension of the primary tumour. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that when LNM are found, the long-term outcomes of EC patients are worse in those who have a LNR ≥ 0.3, the presence of ECI, and a more advanced extension of the primary tumour.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9319184
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Termedia Publishing House
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93191842022-07-27 An analysis of the significance of the lymph node ratio and extracapsular involvement in the prognosis of endometrial cancer patients Gorzelnik, Katarzyna Szubert, Sebastian Knafel, Anna Wójcikiewicz, Anna Nowakowski, Błażej Koper, Krzysztof Wicherek, Łukasz Contemp Oncol (Pozn) Original Paper INTRODUCTION: The primary aim of our study was to analyse the impact of the lymph node ratio (LNR) and extracapsular involvement (ECI) on the prognosis of endometrial cancer (EC) patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We carried out a retrospective analysis of 886 patients surgically treated for EC between 2000 and 2015. In the subgroup of patients with lymph node metastases (LNM), we evaluated the impact of the number and localization of the LNM, LNR, and ECI on patients’ overall survival (OS). RESULTS: In the group of patients with LNM, 0.3 was the optimal LNR cut-off for differentiating between short- and long-term survivors [HR = 2.94 (95% CI: 1.49–5.80)]. Patients with a LNR ≥ 0.3 had a significantly shorter OS period (35.0 months, range 0.2–175 months) compared to patients with a LNR < 0.3 [median OS – mOS, was 143, range 15–169 months; (p = 0.003]. We observed significant differences in the mOS of EC patients without LNM compared to patients with LNM, as well as those with both LNM and ECI (p < 0.0001). In the group of patients with LNM, we also found that a poorer prognosis depended on the extension of the primary tumour. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that when LNM are found, the long-term outcomes of EC patients are worse in those who have a LNR ≥ 0.3, the presence of ECI, and a more advanced extension of the primary tumour. Termedia Publishing House 2022-06-30 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9319184/ /pubmed/35903209 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/wo.2022.118243 Text en Copyright © 2022 Termedia https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/) )
spellingShingle Original Paper
Gorzelnik, Katarzyna
Szubert, Sebastian
Knafel, Anna
Wójcikiewicz, Anna
Nowakowski, Błażej
Koper, Krzysztof
Wicherek, Łukasz
An analysis of the significance of the lymph node ratio and extracapsular involvement in the prognosis of endometrial cancer patients
title An analysis of the significance of the lymph node ratio and extracapsular involvement in the prognosis of endometrial cancer patients
title_full An analysis of the significance of the lymph node ratio and extracapsular involvement in the prognosis of endometrial cancer patients
title_fullStr An analysis of the significance of the lymph node ratio and extracapsular involvement in the prognosis of endometrial cancer patients
title_full_unstemmed An analysis of the significance of the lymph node ratio and extracapsular involvement in the prognosis of endometrial cancer patients
title_short An analysis of the significance of the lymph node ratio and extracapsular involvement in the prognosis of endometrial cancer patients
title_sort analysis of the significance of the lymph node ratio and extracapsular involvement in the prognosis of endometrial cancer patients
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9319184/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35903209
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/wo.2022.118243
work_keys_str_mv AT gorzelnikkatarzyna ananalysisofthesignificanceofthelymphnoderatioandextracapsularinvolvementintheprognosisofendometrialcancerpatients
AT szubertsebastian ananalysisofthesignificanceofthelymphnoderatioandextracapsularinvolvementintheprognosisofendometrialcancerpatients
AT knafelanna ananalysisofthesignificanceofthelymphnoderatioandextracapsularinvolvementintheprognosisofendometrialcancerpatients
AT wojcikiewiczanna ananalysisofthesignificanceofthelymphnoderatioandextracapsularinvolvementintheprognosisofendometrialcancerpatients
AT nowakowskibłazej ananalysisofthesignificanceofthelymphnoderatioandextracapsularinvolvementintheprognosisofendometrialcancerpatients
AT koperkrzysztof ananalysisofthesignificanceofthelymphnoderatioandextracapsularinvolvementintheprognosisofendometrialcancerpatients
AT wicherekłukasz ananalysisofthesignificanceofthelymphnoderatioandextracapsularinvolvementintheprognosisofendometrialcancerpatients
AT gorzelnikkatarzyna analysisofthesignificanceofthelymphnoderatioandextracapsularinvolvementintheprognosisofendometrialcancerpatients
AT szubertsebastian analysisofthesignificanceofthelymphnoderatioandextracapsularinvolvementintheprognosisofendometrialcancerpatients
AT knafelanna analysisofthesignificanceofthelymphnoderatioandextracapsularinvolvementintheprognosisofendometrialcancerpatients
AT wojcikiewiczanna analysisofthesignificanceofthelymphnoderatioandextracapsularinvolvementintheprognosisofendometrialcancerpatients
AT nowakowskibłazej analysisofthesignificanceofthelymphnoderatioandextracapsularinvolvementintheprognosisofendometrialcancerpatients
AT koperkrzysztof analysisofthesignificanceofthelymphnoderatioandextracapsularinvolvementintheprognosisofendometrialcancerpatients
AT wicherekłukasz analysisofthesignificanceofthelymphnoderatioandextracapsularinvolvementintheprognosisofendometrialcancerpatients