Cargando…
Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage of Flowable Composite Resin Using Etch and Rinse, Self-Etch Adhesive Systems, and Self-Adhesive Flowable Composite Resin in Class V Cavities: Confocal Laser Microscopic Study
The essential factor in determining the preservation of restoration is the marginal seal. Restoring cervical lesions with a resin composite has always been a challenge. Composite resins with various viscosities and different bonding systems are being researched to reduce the microleakage. Confocal l...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9319247/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35888429 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15144963 |
_version_ | 1784755502995996672 |
---|---|
author | Sengar, Ekta Varma Mulay, Sanjyot Beri, Lotika Gupta, Archana Almohareb, Thamer Binalrimal, Sultan Robaian, Ali Bahammam, Maha A. Bahammam, Hammam Ahmed Bahammam, Sarah Ahmed Zidane, Bassam Albar, Nassreen H. Bhandi, Shilpa Shrivastava, Deepti Srivastava, Kumar Chandan Patil, Shankargouda |
author_facet | Sengar, Ekta Varma Mulay, Sanjyot Beri, Lotika Gupta, Archana Almohareb, Thamer Binalrimal, Sultan Robaian, Ali Bahammam, Maha A. Bahammam, Hammam Ahmed Bahammam, Sarah Ahmed Zidane, Bassam Albar, Nassreen H. Bhandi, Shilpa Shrivastava, Deepti Srivastava, Kumar Chandan Patil, Shankargouda |
author_sort | Sengar, Ekta Varma |
collection | PubMed |
description | The essential factor in determining the preservation of restoration is the marginal seal. Restoring cervical lesions with a resin composite has always been a challenge. Composite resins with various viscosities and different bonding systems are being researched to reduce the microleakage. Confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) is the latest non-destructive technique for visualizing the microleakage. Objectives: To evaluate and compare the microleakage of Universal Flo composite resin (G-aenial) using etch and rinse adhesive system ER-2 steps (Adper Single Bond 2), self-etch adhesive system SE-1 step (G-Bond), and self-adhesive flowable composite resin (Constic) in Class V cavities using a confocal laser scanning microscope. Materials and Method: Class V cavities were prepared on 27 caries-free human extracted premolar teeth on the buccal and lingual surfaces with standardized dimensions of 2 mm height, width 4 mm, and a depth of 2 mm. After the cavity preparation, all teeth were randomly divided into three groups, namely Group-I: G-aenial Universal Flo with Single Bond 2 (n = 9 teeth); Group-II: G- aenial Universal Flo with G-Bond (n = 9 teeth), and Group-III: Constic (n = 9 teeth). The prepared and restored specimens were then subjected to thermocycling for 500 cycles in a water bath at 5 °C and 55 °C with a dwelling time of 30 s. The specimens were placed in 0.6% aqueous rhodamine dye for 48 h. Sectioning was carried out bucco-lingually and specimens were evaluated for microleakage under a confocal laser scanning microscope. Results: There was a significant difference (p = 0.009) in microleakage when comparing total etch and rinse, specifically between Adper Single Bond 2 ER-2 steps (fifth generation) and self-adhesive flowable composite resin, which is Constic. There was more microleakage in the self-etch bonding agent, particularly G-Bond, SE-1 step (seventh generation), when compared to ER-2 steps (fifth generation bonding agent); however, the results were not statistically significant (p = 0.468). The self-adhesive flowable composite resin showed more microleakage than SE-1 step and ER-2 steps. Conclusions: None of the adhesive systems tested were free from microleakage. However, less microleakage was observed in the total etch and rinse, especially Adper Single Bond 2 (ER-2 steps), than the self-etch adhesive system SE-1 step and self-adhesive flowable composite resin. Clinical significance: Constant research and technological advancements are taking place in dentin adhesives to improve the marginal seal. This has led to the evolution of total acid-etching dentin bonding agents termed as etch and rinse (ER)-2 steps (fifth generation dentin bonding agents) and self-etching (SE) 2 steps, and SE-1 step dentin bonding agents termed as the sixth and seventh generation bonding agents, respectively. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9319247 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93192472022-07-27 Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage of Flowable Composite Resin Using Etch and Rinse, Self-Etch Adhesive Systems, and Self-Adhesive Flowable Composite Resin in Class V Cavities: Confocal Laser Microscopic Study Sengar, Ekta Varma Mulay, Sanjyot Beri, Lotika Gupta, Archana Almohareb, Thamer Binalrimal, Sultan Robaian, Ali Bahammam, Maha A. Bahammam, Hammam Ahmed Bahammam, Sarah Ahmed Zidane, Bassam Albar, Nassreen H. Bhandi, Shilpa Shrivastava, Deepti Srivastava, Kumar Chandan Patil, Shankargouda Materials (Basel) Article The essential factor in determining the preservation of restoration is the marginal seal. Restoring cervical lesions with a resin composite has always been a challenge. Composite resins with various viscosities and different bonding systems are being researched to reduce the microleakage. Confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) is the latest non-destructive technique for visualizing the microleakage. Objectives: To evaluate and compare the microleakage of Universal Flo composite resin (G-aenial) using etch and rinse adhesive system ER-2 steps (Adper Single Bond 2), self-etch adhesive system SE-1 step (G-Bond), and self-adhesive flowable composite resin (Constic) in Class V cavities using a confocal laser scanning microscope. Materials and Method: Class V cavities were prepared on 27 caries-free human extracted premolar teeth on the buccal and lingual surfaces with standardized dimensions of 2 mm height, width 4 mm, and a depth of 2 mm. After the cavity preparation, all teeth were randomly divided into three groups, namely Group-I: G-aenial Universal Flo with Single Bond 2 (n = 9 teeth); Group-II: G- aenial Universal Flo with G-Bond (n = 9 teeth), and Group-III: Constic (n = 9 teeth). The prepared and restored specimens were then subjected to thermocycling for 500 cycles in a water bath at 5 °C and 55 °C with a dwelling time of 30 s. The specimens were placed in 0.6% aqueous rhodamine dye for 48 h. Sectioning was carried out bucco-lingually and specimens were evaluated for microleakage under a confocal laser scanning microscope. Results: There was a significant difference (p = 0.009) in microleakage when comparing total etch and rinse, specifically between Adper Single Bond 2 ER-2 steps (fifth generation) and self-adhesive flowable composite resin, which is Constic. There was more microleakage in the self-etch bonding agent, particularly G-Bond, SE-1 step (seventh generation), when compared to ER-2 steps (fifth generation bonding agent); however, the results were not statistically significant (p = 0.468). The self-adhesive flowable composite resin showed more microleakage than SE-1 step and ER-2 steps. Conclusions: None of the adhesive systems tested were free from microleakage. However, less microleakage was observed in the total etch and rinse, especially Adper Single Bond 2 (ER-2 steps), than the self-etch adhesive system SE-1 step and self-adhesive flowable composite resin. Clinical significance: Constant research and technological advancements are taking place in dentin adhesives to improve the marginal seal. This has led to the evolution of total acid-etching dentin bonding agents termed as etch and rinse (ER)-2 steps (fifth generation dentin bonding agents) and self-etching (SE) 2 steps, and SE-1 step dentin bonding agents termed as the sixth and seventh generation bonding agents, respectively. MDPI 2022-07-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9319247/ /pubmed/35888429 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15144963 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Sengar, Ekta Varma Mulay, Sanjyot Beri, Lotika Gupta, Archana Almohareb, Thamer Binalrimal, Sultan Robaian, Ali Bahammam, Maha A. Bahammam, Hammam Ahmed Bahammam, Sarah Ahmed Zidane, Bassam Albar, Nassreen H. Bhandi, Shilpa Shrivastava, Deepti Srivastava, Kumar Chandan Patil, Shankargouda Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage of Flowable Composite Resin Using Etch and Rinse, Self-Etch Adhesive Systems, and Self-Adhesive Flowable Composite Resin in Class V Cavities: Confocal Laser Microscopic Study |
title | Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage of Flowable Composite Resin Using Etch and Rinse, Self-Etch Adhesive Systems, and Self-Adhesive Flowable Composite Resin in Class V Cavities: Confocal Laser Microscopic Study |
title_full | Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage of Flowable Composite Resin Using Etch and Rinse, Self-Etch Adhesive Systems, and Self-Adhesive Flowable Composite Resin in Class V Cavities: Confocal Laser Microscopic Study |
title_fullStr | Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage of Flowable Composite Resin Using Etch and Rinse, Self-Etch Adhesive Systems, and Self-Adhesive Flowable Composite Resin in Class V Cavities: Confocal Laser Microscopic Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage of Flowable Composite Resin Using Etch and Rinse, Self-Etch Adhesive Systems, and Self-Adhesive Flowable Composite Resin in Class V Cavities: Confocal Laser Microscopic Study |
title_short | Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage of Flowable Composite Resin Using Etch and Rinse, Self-Etch Adhesive Systems, and Self-Adhesive Flowable Composite Resin in Class V Cavities: Confocal Laser Microscopic Study |
title_sort | comparative evaluation of microleakage of flowable composite resin using etch and rinse, self-etch adhesive systems, and self-adhesive flowable composite resin in class v cavities: confocal laser microscopic study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9319247/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35888429 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15144963 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sengarektavarma comparativeevaluationofmicroleakageofflowablecompositeresinusingetchandrinseselfetchadhesivesystemsandselfadhesiveflowablecompositeresininclassvcavitiesconfocallasermicroscopicstudy AT mulaysanjyot comparativeevaluationofmicroleakageofflowablecompositeresinusingetchandrinseselfetchadhesivesystemsandselfadhesiveflowablecompositeresininclassvcavitiesconfocallasermicroscopicstudy AT berilotika comparativeevaluationofmicroleakageofflowablecompositeresinusingetchandrinseselfetchadhesivesystemsandselfadhesiveflowablecompositeresininclassvcavitiesconfocallasermicroscopicstudy AT guptaarchana comparativeevaluationofmicroleakageofflowablecompositeresinusingetchandrinseselfetchadhesivesystemsandselfadhesiveflowablecompositeresininclassvcavitiesconfocallasermicroscopicstudy AT almoharebthamer comparativeevaluationofmicroleakageofflowablecompositeresinusingetchandrinseselfetchadhesivesystemsandselfadhesiveflowablecompositeresininclassvcavitiesconfocallasermicroscopicstudy AT binalrimalsultan comparativeevaluationofmicroleakageofflowablecompositeresinusingetchandrinseselfetchadhesivesystemsandselfadhesiveflowablecompositeresininclassvcavitiesconfocallasermicroscopicstudy AT robaianali comparativeevaluationofmicroleakageofflowablecompositeresinusingetchandrinseselfetchadhesivesystemsandselfadhesiveflowablecompositeresininclassvcavitiesconfocallasermicroscopicstudy AT bahammammahaa comparativeevaluationofmicroleakageofflowablecompositeresinusingetchandrinseselfetchadhesivesystemsandselfadhesiveflowablecompositeresininclassvcavitiesconfocallasermicroscopicstudy AT bahammamhammamahmed comparativeevaluationofmicroleakageofflowablecompositeresinusingetchandrinseselfetchadhesivesystemsandselfadhesiveflowablecompositeresininclassvcavitiesconfocallasermicroscopicstudy AT bahammamsarahahmed comparativeevaluationofmicroleakageofflowablecompositeresinusingetchandrinseselfetchadhesivesystemsandselfadhesiveflowablecompositeresininclassvcavitiesconfocallasermicroscopicstudy AT zidanebassam comparativeevaluationofmicroleakageofflowablecompositeresinusingetchandrinseselfetchadhesivesystemsandselfadhesiveflowablecompositeresininclassvcavitiesconfocallasermicroscopicstudy AT albarnassreenh comparativeevaluationofmicroleakageofflowablecompositeresinusingetchandrinseselfetchadhesivesystemsandselfadhesiveflowablecompositeresininclassvcavitiesconfocallasermicroscopicstudy AT bhandishilpa comparativeevaluationofmicroleakageofflowablecompositeresinusingetchandrinseselfetchadhesivesystemsandselfadhesiveflowablecompositeresininclassvcavitiesconfocallasermicroscopicstudy AT shrivastavadeepti comparativeevaluationofmicroleakageofflowablecompositeresinusingetchandrinseselfetchadhesivesystemsandselfadhesiveflowablecompositeresininclassvcavitiesconfocallasermicroscopicstudy AT srivastavakumarchandan comparativeevaluationofmicroleakageofflowablecompositeresinusingetchandrinseselfetchadhesivesystemsandselfadhesiveflowablecompositeresininclassvcavitiesconfocallasermicroscopicstudy AT patilshankargouda comparativeevaluationofmicroleakageofflowablecompositeresinusingetchandrinseselfetchadhesivesystemsandselfadhesiveflowablecompositeresininclassvcavitiesconfocallasermicroscopicstudy |