Cargando…

Virtual Reality in Palliative Care: A Systematic Review

Background: Virtual reality (VR) using head-mounted displays (HMDs) has demonstrated to be an effective tool for treating various somatic and psychological symptoms. Technological advances and increased affordability of VR technology provide an interesting option for delivering psychological interve...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Martin, Jessica L., Saredakis, Dimitrios, Hutchinson, Amanda D., Crawford, Gregory B., Loetscher, Tobias
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9319274/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35885749
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10071222
_version_ 1784755509617754112
author Martin, Jessica L.
Saredakis, Dimitrios
Hutchinson, Amanda D.
Crawford, Gregory B.
Loetscher, Tobias
author_facet Martin, Jessica L.
Saredakis, Dimitrios
Hutchinson, Amanda D.
Crawford, Gregory B.
Loetscher, Tobias
author_sort Martin, Jessica L.
collection PubMed
description Background: Virtual reality (VR) using head-mounted displays (HMDs) has demonstrated to be an effective tool for treating various somatic and psychological symptoms. Technological advances and increased affordability of VR technology provide an interesting option for delivering psychological interventions to patients in palliative care. The primary aim of this systematic review was to synthesise the available research on the use of VR for enhancing psychological and somatic outcomes for palliative care patients. Secondary aims included assessing general satisfaction and overall usability. Method: A pre-registered systematic literature search was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines using OVID Emcare, Cochrane Library, Embase, Medline, PsycINFO, and PubMed Care Search: Palliative Care Knowledge Network. Peer-reviewed experimental, quasi-experimental, observational, case, and feasibility studies consisting of single or multiple VR sessions using HMDs that reported psychological and/or somatic outcomes were included. Results: Eight studies published between 2019 and 2021 were included, representing 138 patients. While the reported quantitative psychological and somatic outcomes were ambiguous, the qualitative outcomes were largely positive. Participants were generally satisfied with VR, and most studies reported the VR interventions as usable, feasible, and acceptable. Conclusions: VR shows promise in palliative care and generally addresses a range of symptoms with few adverse effects. Future research should consist of adequately powered RCTs evaluating dosage and focusing on providing meaningful activities to enhance outcomes further.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9319274
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93192742022-07-27 Virtual Reality in Palliative Care: A Systematic Review Martin, Jessica L. Saredakis, Dimitrios Hutchinson, Amanda D. Crawford, Gregory B. Loetscher, Tobias Healthcare (Basel) Systematic Review Background: Virtual reality (VR) using head-mounted displays (HMDs) has demonstrated to be an effective tool for treating various somatic and psychological symptoms. Technological advances and increased affordability of VR technology provide an interesting option for delivering psychological interventions to patients in palliative care. The primary aim of this systematic review was to synthesise the available research on the use of VR for enhancing psychological and somatic outcomes for palliative care patients. Secondary aims included assessing general satisfaction and overall usability. Method: A pre-registered systematic literature search was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines using OVID Emcare, Cochrane Library, Embase, Medline, PsycINFO, and PubMed Care Search: Palliative Care Knowledge Network. Peer-reviewed experimental, quasi-experimental, observational, case, and feasibility studies consisting of single or multiple VR sessions using HMDs that reported psychological and/or somatic outcomes were included. Results: Eight studies published between 2019 and 2021 were included, representing 138 patients. While the reported quantitative psychological and somatic outcomes were ambiguous, the qualitative outcomes were largely positive. Participants were generally satisfied with VR, and most studies reported the VR interventions as usable, feasible, and acceptable. Conclusions: VR shows promise in palliative care and generally addresses a range of symptoms with few adverse effects. Future research should consist of adequately powered RCTs evaluating dosage and focusing on providing meaningful activities to enhance outcomes further. MDPI 2022-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9319274/ /pubmed/35885749 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10071222 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Martin, Jessica L.
Saredakis, Dimitrios
Hutchinson, Amanda D.
Crawford, Gregory B.
Loetscher, Tobias
Virtual Reality in Palliative Care: A Systematic Review
title Virtual Reality in Palliative Care: A Systematic Review
title_full Virtual Reality in Palliative Care: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Virtual Reality in Palliative Care: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Virtual Reality in Palliative Care: A Systematic Review
title_short Virtual Reality in Palliative Care: A Systematic Review
title_sort virtual reality in palliative care: a systematic review
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9319274/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35885749
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10071222
work_keys_str_mv AT martinjessical virtualrealityinpalliativecareasystematicreview
AT saredakisdimitrios virtualrealityinpalliativecareasystematicreview
AT hutchinsonamandad virtualrealityinpalliativecareasystematicreview
AT crawfordgregoryb virtualrealityinpalliativecareasystematicreview
AT loetschertobias virtualrealityinpalliativecareasystematicreview