Cargando…

Cervical Cancer Prophylaxis—State-of-the-Art and Perspectives

Background: Each year 604,127 new cases of cervical cancer (CC) are diagnosed, and 341,831 individuals die from the disease. It is the fourth most common cancer among women and the fourth most common cause of death from female cancers worldwide. The pathogenesis of CC is associated with human papill...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Poniewierza, Patryk, Panek, Grzegorz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9319342/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35885852
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10071325
_version_ 1784755526155894784
author Poniewierza, Patryk
Panek, Grzegorz
author_facet Poniewierza, Patryk
Panek, Grzegorz
author_sort Poniewierza, Patryk
collection PubMed
description Background: Each year 604,127 new cases of cervical cancer (CC) are diagnosed, and 341,831 individuals die from the disease. It is the fourth most common cancer among women and the fourth most common cause of death from female cancers worldwide. The pathogenesis of CC is associated with human papillomavirus (HPV) infections and consists of several steps involving cell proliferation outside the human body’s control mechanisms. Strategies to prevent CC are based on screening and vaccination. Scope of the Review: The aim of this paper was to collect and analyze the available literature on the issue of CC prevention and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on its implementation. For this purpose, PubMed and Google Scholar databases were searched using keywords, such as “cervical cancer”; “HPV”; “prevention”; “prophylaxis”; “vaccination”; “screening” and “COVID-19” in different variations. Only articles published since 2018 were included in the study. Conclusions: Selected European countries have different CC prevention programs funded by national budgets. This translates into observed differences in the risk of death from CC (age-standardized rate Malta = 1.1, Poland = 5.9). COVID-19 pandemic due to disruption of CC screening may exacerbate these differences in the future. To improve the situation, new screening methods, such as p16/Ki67, HPV self-testing, and the use of artificial intelligence in colposcopic assessment, should be disseminated, as well as free HPV vaccination programs implemented in all countries. The search for new solutions is not without significance and entails ultra-sensitive screening tests for risk groups (mRNA E6/E7, SOX1/SOX14), HPV vaccines with shorter dosing schedules, and new therapeutic pathways using nanotheranostics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9319342
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93193422022-07-27 Cervical Cancer Prophylaxis—State-of-the-Art and Perspectives Poniewierza, Patryk Panek, Grzegorz Healthcare (Basel) Review Background: Each year 604,127 new cases of cervical cancer (CC) are diagnosed, and 341,831 individuals die from the disease. It is the fourth most common cancer among women and the fourth most common cause of death from female cancers worldwide. The pathogenesis of CC is associated with human papillomavirus (HPV) infections and consists of several steps involving cell proliferation outside the human body’s control mechanisms. Strategies to prevent CC are based on screening and vaccination. Scope of the Review: The aim of this paper was to collect and analyze the available literature on the issue of CC prevention and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on its implementation. For this purpose, PubMed and Google Scholar databases were searched using keywords, such as “cervical cancer”; “HPV”; “prevention”; “prophylaxis”; “vaccination”; “screening” and “COVID-19” in different variations. Only articles published since 2018 were included in the study. Conclusions: Selected European countries have different CC prevention programs funded by national budgets. This translates into observed differences in the risk of death from CC (age-standardized rate Malta = 1.1, Poland = 5.9). COVID-19 pandemic due to disruption of CC screening may exacerbate these differences in the future. To improve the situation, new screening methods, such as p16/Ki67, HPV self-testing, and the use of artificial intelligence in colposcopic assessment, should be disseminated, as well as free HPV vaccination programs implemented in all countries. The search for new solutions is not without significance and entails ultra-sensitive screening tests for risk groups (mRNA E6/E7, SOX1/SOX14), HPV vaccines with shorter dosing schedules, and new therapeutic pathways using nanotheranostics. MDPI 2022-07-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9319342/ /pubmed/35885852 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10071325 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Poniewierza, Patryk
Panek, Grzegorz
Cervical Cancer Prophylaxis—State-of-the-Art and Perspectives
title Cervical Cancer Prophylaxis—State-of-the-Art and Perspectives
title_full Cervical Cancer Prophylaxis—State-of-the-Art and Perspectives
title_fullStr Cervical Cancer Prophylaxis—State-of-the-Art and Perspectives
title_full_unstemmed Cervical Cancer Prophylaxis—State-of-the-Art and Perspectives
title_short Cervical Cancer Prophylaxis—State-of-the-Art and Perspectives
title_sort cervical cancer prophylaxis—state-of-the-art and perspectives
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9319342/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35885852
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10071325
work_keys_str_mv AT poniewierzapatryk cervicalcancerprophylaxisstateoftheartandperspectives
AT panekgrzegorz cervicalcancerprophylaxisstateoftheartandperspectives