Cargando…

Assessment of Socket Pressure during Walking in Rapid Fit Prosthetic Sockets

(1) Background: A sustainable casting system that combines the use of a polystyrene bag, a prosthetic liner and a vacuum system was developed to reduce fabrication time while maintaining comfort for the trans-tibial prosthesis user. (2) Methods: Eight prosthetists (28.7 ± 8.25 years old) fit ten tra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sasaki, Kazuhiko, Guerra, Gary, Lei Phyu, Win, Chaisumritchoke, Sirarat, Sutdet, Prawina, Kaewtip, Sirintip
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9319515/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35890905
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22145224
_version_ 1784755568102080512
author Sasaki, Kazuhiko
Guerra, Gary
Lei Phyu, Win
Chaisumritchoke, Sirarat
Sutdet, Prawina
Kaewtip, Sirintip
author_facet Sasaki, Kazuhiko
Guerra, Gary
Lei Phyu, Win
Chaisumritchoke, Sirarat
Sutdet, Prawina
Kaewtip, Sirintip
author_sort Sasaki, Kazuhiko
collection PubMed
description (1) Background: A sustainable casting system that combines the use of a polystyrene bag, a prosthetic liner and a vacuum system was developed to reduce fabrication time while maintaining comfort for the trans-tibial prosthesis user. (2) Methods: Eight prosthetists (28.7 ± 8.25 years old) fit ten trans-tibial prosthesis wearers (46 ± 12.4 years old) with two types of total surface bearing (TSB) prostheses; a polystyrene bead (PS) prosthesis and a plaster of paris (POP) prosthesis. Duration of casting and combined mean peak pressure was measured at six locations on the residual limb using Force Sensing Resistors (FSR). A pressure uniformity score (%) was determined. Socket Comfort Scale (SCS) was also measured. (3) Results: Duration of casting for the POP method was 64.8 ± 9.53 min and 7.8 ± 2 min for the PS method, (p = 0.006). Pressure uniformity in the POP prosthesis was 79.3 ± 6.54 and 81.7 ± 5.83 in the PS prosthesis (p = 0.027). SCS in both prosthesis types were equivalent. (4) Conclusion: A rapid fit PS prosthesis was developed, with significantly shorter duration than the traditional POP method. Socket pressure uniformity was confirmed and improved in the PS method. Socket comfort was equal between the two prothesis types.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9319515
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93195152022-07-27 Assessment of Socket Pressure during Walking in Rapid Fit Prosthetic Sockets Sasaki, Kazuhiko Guerra, Gary Lei Phyu, Win Chaisumritchoke, Sirarat Sutdet, Prawina Kaewtip, Sirintip Sensors (Basel) Communication (1) Background: A sustainable casting system that combines the use of a polystyrene bag, a prosthetic liner and a vacuum system was developed to reduce fabrication time while maintaining comfort for the trans-tibial prosthesis user. (2) Methods: Eight prosthetists (28.7 ± 8.25 years old) fit ten trans-tibial prosthesis wearers (46 ± 12.4 years old) with two types of total surface bearing (TSB) prostheses; a polystyrene bead (PS) prosthesis and a plaster of paris (POP) prosthesis. Duration of casting and combined mean peak pressure was measured at six locations on the residual limb using Force Sensing Resistors (FSR). A pressure uniformity score (%) was determined. Socket Comfort Scale (SCS) was also measured. (3) Results: Duration of casting for the POP method was 64.8 ± 9.53 min and 7.8 ± 2 min for the PS method, (p = 0.006). Pressure uniformity in the POP prosthesis was 79.3 ± 6.54 and 81.7 ± 5.83 in the PS prosthesis (p = 0.027). SCS in both prosthesis types were equivalent. (4) Conclusion: A rapid fit PS prosthesis was developed, with significantly shorter duration than the traditional POP method. Socket pressure uniformity was confirmed and improved in the PS method. Socket comfort was equal between the two prothesis types. MDPI 2022-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9319515/ /pubmed/35890905 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22145224 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Communication
Sasaki, Kazuhiko
Guerra, Gary
Lei Phyu, Win
Chaisumritchoke, Sirarat
Sutdet, Prawina
Kaewtip, Sirintip
Assessment of Socket Pressure during Walking in Rapid Fit Prosthetic Sockets
title Assessment of Socket Pressure during Walking in Rapid Fit Prosthetic Sockets
title_full Assessment of Socket Pressure during Walking in Rapid Fit Prosthetic Sockets
title_fullStr Assessment of Socket Pressure during Walking in Rapid Fit Prosthetic Sockets
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of Socket Pressure during Walking in Rapid Fit Prosthetic Sockets
title_short Assessment of Socket Pressure during Walking in Rapid Fit Prosthetic Sockets
title_sort assessment of socket pressure during walking in rapid fit prosthetic sockets
topic Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9319515/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35890905
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22145224
work_keys_str_mv AT sasakikazuhiko assessmentofsocketpressureduringwalkinginrapidfitprostheticsockets
AT guerragary assessmentofsocketpressureduringwalkinginrapidfitprostheticsockets
AT leiphyuwin assessmentofsocketpressureduringwalkinginrapidfitprostheticsockets
AT chaisumritchokesirarat assessmentofsocketpressureduringwalkinginrapidfitprostheticsockets
AT sutdetprawina assessmentofsocketpressureduringwalkinginrapidfitprostheticsockets
AT kaewtipsirintip assessmentofsocketpressureduringwalkinginrapidfitprostheticsockets