Cargando…

“No Ink on Tumor” in Breast-Conserving Surgery after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

Background/Aim: Patients with Stage I-II breast cancer undergoing breast-conserving surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (BCS-NAC) were retrospectively assessed in order to evaluate the extent of a safe excision margin. Materials and Methods: Between 2003 and 2020, 151 patients underwent risk-adap...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Atzori, Giulia, Gipponi, Marco, Cornacchia, Chiara, Diaz, Raquel, Sparavigna, Marco, Gallo, Maurizio, Ruelle, Tommaso, Murelli, Federica, Franchelli, Simonetta, Depaoli, Francesca, Friedman, Daniele, Fregatti, Piero
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9320436/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35887526
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12071031
_version_ 1784755792080011264
author Atzori, Giulia
Gipponi, Marco
Cornacchia, Chiara
Diaz, Raquel
Sparavigna, Marco
Gallo, Maurizio
Ruelle, Tommaso
Murelli, Federica
Franchelli, Simonetta
Depaoli, Francesca
Friedman, Daniele
Fregatti, Piero
author_facet Atzori, Giulia
Gipponi, Marco
Cornacchia, Chiara
Diaz, Raquel
Sparavigna, Marco
Gallo, Maurizio
Ruelle, Tommaso
Murelli, Federica
Franchelli, Simonetta
Depaoli, Francesca
Friedman, Daniele
Fregatti, Piero
author_sort Atzori, Giulia
collection PubMed
description Background/Aim: Patients with Stage I-II breast cancer undergoing breast-conserving surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (BCS-NAC) were retrospectively assessed in order to evaluate the extent of a safe excision margin. Materials and Methods: Between 2003 and 2020, 151 patients underwent risk-adapted BCS-NAC; margin involvement was always assessed at definitive histology. Patients with complete pathological response (pCR) were classified as the RX group, whereas those with residual disease and negative margins were stratified as R0 < 1 mm (margin < 1 mm) and R0 > 1 mm (margin > 1 mm). Results: Totals of 29 (19.2%), 64 (42.4%), and 58 patients (38.4%) were included in the R0 < 1 mm, R0 > 1 mm, and RX groups, respectively, and 2 patients with margin involvement had a mastectomy. Ten instances of local recurrence (6.6%) occurred, with no statistically significant difference in local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) between the three groups. A statistically significant advantage of disease-free survival (p = 0.002) and overall survival (p = 0.010) was observed in patients with pCR. Conclusions: BCS-NAC was increased, especially in HER-2-positive and triple-negative tumors; risk-adapted BCS should be preferably pursued to highlight the cosmetic benefit of NAC. The similar rate of LRFS in the three groups of patients suggests a shift toward the “no ink on tumor” paradigm for patients undergoing BCS-NAC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9320436
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93204362022-07-27 “No Ink on Tumor” in Breast-Conserving Surgery after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Atzori, Giulia Gipponi, Marco Cornacchia, Chiara Diaz, Raquel Sparavigna, Marco Gallo, Maurizio Ruelle, Tommaso Murelli, Federica Franchelli, Simonetta Depaoli, Francesca Friedman, Daniele Fregatti, Piero J Pers Med Article Background/Aim: Patients with Stage I-II breast cancer undergoing breast-conserving surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (BCS-NAC) were retrospectively assessed in order to evaluate the extent of a safe excision margin. Materials and Methods: Between 2003 and 2020, 151 patients underwent risk-adapted BCS-NAC; margin involvement was always assessed at definitive histology. Patients with complete pathological response (pCR) were classified as the RX group, whereas those with residual disease and negative margins were stratified as R0 < 1 mm (margin < 1 mm) and R0 > 1 mm (margin > 1 mm). Results: Totals of 29 (19.2%), 64 (42.4%), and 58 patients (38.4%) were included in the R0 < 1 mm, R0 > 1 mm, and RX groups, respectively, and 2 patients with margin involvement had a mastectomy. Ten instances of local recurrence (6.6%) occurred, with no statistically significant difference in local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) between the three groups. A statistically significant advantage of disease-free survival (p = 0.002) and overall survival (p = 0.010) was observed in patients with pCR. Conclusions: BCS-NAC was increased, especially in HER-2-positive and triple-negative tumors; risk-adapted BCS should be preferably pursued to highlight the cosmetic benefit of NAC. The similar rate of LRFS in the three groups of patients suggests a shift toward the “no ink on tumor” paradigm for patients undergoing BCS-NAC. MDPI 2022-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9320436/ /pubmed/35887526 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12071031 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Atzori, Giulia
Gipponi, Marco
Cornacchia, Chiara
Diaz, Raquel
Sparavigna, Marco
Gallo, Maurizio
Ruelle, Tommaso
Murelli, Federica
Franchelli, Simonetta
Depaoli, Francesca
Friedman, Daniele
Fregatti, Piero
“No Ink on Tumor” in Breast-Conserving Surgery after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
title “No Ink on Tumor” in Breast-Conserving Surgery after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
title_full “No Ink on Tumor” in Breast-Conserving Surgery after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
title_fullStr “No Ink on Tumor” in Breast-Conserving Surgery after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
title_full_unstemmed “No Ink on Tumor” in Breast-Conserving Surgery after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
title_short “No Ink on Tumor” in Breast-Conserving Surgery after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
title_sort “no ink on tumor” in breast-conserving surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9320436/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35887526
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12071031
work_keys_str_mv AT atzorigiulia noinkontumorinbreastconservingsurgeryafterneoadjuvantchemotherapy
AT gipponimarco noinkontumorinbreastconservingsurgeryafterneoadjuvantchemotherapy
AT cornacchiachiara noinkontumorinbreastconservingsurgeryafterneoadjuvantchemotherapy
AT diazraquel noinkontumorinbreastconservingsurgeryafterneoadjuvantchemotherapy
AT sparavignamarco noinkontumorinbreastconservingsurgeryafterneoadjuvantchemotherapy
AT gallomaurizio noinkontumorinbreastconservingsurgeryafterneoadjuvantchemotherapy
AT ruelletommaso noinkontumorinbreastconservingsurgeryafterneoadjuvantchemotherapy
AT murellifederica noinkontumorinbreastconservingsurgeryafterneoadjuvantchemotherapy
AT franchellisimonetta noinkontumorinbreastconservingsurgeryafterneoadjuvantchemotherapy
AT depaolifrancesca noinkontumorinbreastconservingsurgeryafterneoadjuvantchemotherapy
AT friedmandaniele noinkontumorinbreastconservingsurgeryafterneoadjuvantchemotherapy
AT fregattipiero noinkontumorinbreastconservingsurgeryafterneoadjuvantchemotherapy