Cargando…
“No Ink on Tumor” in Breast-Conserving Surgery after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
Background/Aim: Patients with Stage I-II breast cancer undergoing breast-conserving surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (BCS-NAC) were retrospectively assessed in order to evaluate the extent of a safe excision margin. Materials and Methods: Between 2003 and 2020, 151 patients underwent risk-adap...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9320436/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35887526 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12071031 |
_version_ | 1784755792080011264 |
---|---|
author | Atzori, Giulia Gipponi, Marco Cornacchia, Chiara Diaz, Raquel Sparavigna, Marco Gallo, Maurizio Ruelle, Tommaso Murelli, Federica Franchelli, Simonetta Depaoli, Francesca Friedman, Daniele Fregatti, Piero |
author_facet | Atzori, Giulia Gipponi, Marco Cornacchia, Chiara Diaz, Raquel Sparavigna, Marco Gallo, Maurizio Ruelle, Tommaso Murelli, Federica Franchelli, Simonetta Depaoli, Francesca Friedman, Daniele Fregatti, Piero |
author_sort | Atzori, Giulia |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background/Aim: Patients with Stage I-II breast cancer undergoing breast-conserving surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (BCS-NAC) were retrospectively assessed in order to evaluate the extent of a safe excision margin. Materials and Methods: Between 2003 and 2020, 151 patients underwent risk-adapted BCS-NAC; margin involvement was always assessed at definitive histology. Patients with complete pathological response (pCR) were classified as the RX group, whereas those with residual disease and negative margins were stratified as R0 < 1 mm (margin < 1 mm) and R0 > 1 mm (margin > 1 mm). Results: Totals of 29 (19.2%), 64 (42.4%), and 58 patients (38.4%) were included in the R0 < 1 mm, R0 > 1 mm, and RX groups, respectively, and 2 patients with margin involvement had a mastectomy. Ten instances of local recurrence (6.6%) occurred, with no statistically significant difference in local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) between the three groups. A statistically significant advantage of disease-free survival (p = 0.002) and overall survival (p = 0.010) was observed in patients with pCR. Conclusions: BCS-NAC was increased, especially in HER-2-positive and triple-negative tumors; risk-adapted BCS should be preferably pursued to highlight the cosmetic benefit of NAC. The similar rate of LRFS in the three groups of patients suggests a shift toward the “no ink on tumor” paradigm for patients undergoing BCS-NAC. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9320436 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93204362022-07-27 “No Ink on Tumor” in Breast-Conserving Surgery after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Atzori, Giulia Gipponi, Marco Cornacchia, Chiara Diaz, Raquel Sparavigna, Marco Gallo, Maurizio Ruelle, Tommaso Murelli, Federica Franchelli, Simonetta Depaoli, Francesca Friedman, Daniele Fregatti, Piero J Pers Med Article Background/Aim: Patients with Stage I-II breast cancer undergoing breast-conserving surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (BCS-NAC) were retrospectively assessed in order to evaluate the extent of a safe excision margin. Materials and Methods: Between 2003 and 2020, 151 patients underwent risk-adapted BCS-NAC; margin involvement was always assessed at definitive histology. Patients with complete pathological response (pCR) were classified as the RX group, whereas those with residual disease and negative margins were stratified as R0 < 1 mm (margin < 1 mm) and R0 > 1 mm (margin > 1 mm). Results: Totals of 29 (19.2%), 64 (42.4%), and 58 patients (38.4%) were included in the R0 < 1 mm, R0 > 1 mm, and RX groups, respectively, and 2 patients with margin involvement had a mastectomy. Ten instances of local recurrence (6.6%) occurred, with no statistically significant difference in local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) between the three groups. A statistically significant advantage of disease-free survival (p = 0.002) and overall survival (p = 0.010) was observed in patients with pCR. Conclusions: BCS-NAC was increased, especially in HER-2-positive and triple-negative tumors; risk-adapted BCS should be preferably pursued to highlight the cosmetic benefit of NAC. The similar rate of LRFS in the three groups of patients suggests a shift toward the “no ink on tumor” paradigm for patients undergoing BCS-NAC. MDPI 2022-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9320436/ /pubmed/35887526 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12071031 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Atzori, Giulia Gipponi, Marco Cornacchia, Chiara Diaz, Raquel Sparavigna, Marco Gallo, Maurizio Ruelle, Tommaso Murelli, Federica Franchelli, Simonetta Depaoli, Francesca Friedman, Daniele Fregatti, Piero “No Ink on Tumor” in Breast-Conserving Surgery after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy |
title | “No Ink on Tumor” in Breast-Conserving Surgery after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy |
title_full | “No Ink on Tumor” in Breast-Conserving Surgery after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy |
title_fullStr | “No Ink on Tumor” in Breast-Conserving Surgery after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy |
title_full_unstemmed | “No Ink on Tumor” in Breast-Conserving Surgery after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy |
title_short | “No Ink on Tumor” in Breast-Conserving Surgery after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy |
title_sort | “no ink on tumor” in breast-conserving surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9320436/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35887526 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12071031 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT atzorigiulia noinkontumorinbreastconservingsurgeryafterneoadjuvantchemotherapy AT gipponimarco noinkontumorinbreastconservingsurgeryafterneoadjuvantchemotherapy AT cornacchiachiara noinkontumorinbreastconservingsurgeryafterneoadjuvantchemotherapy AT diazraquel noinkontumorinbreastconservingsurgeryafterneoadjuvantchemotherapy AT sparavignamarco noinkontumorinbreastconservingsurgeryafterneoadjuvantchemotherapy AT gallomaurizio noinkontumorinbreastconservingsurgeryafterneoadjuvantchemotherapy AT ruelletommaso noinkontumorinbreastconservingsurgeryafterneoadjuvantchemotherapy AT murellifederica noinkontumorinbreastconservingsurgeryafterneoadjuvantchemotherapy AT franchellisimonetta noinkontumorinbreastconservingsurgeryafterneoadjuvantchemotherapy AT depaolifrancesca noinkontumorinbreastconservingsurgeryafterneoadjuvantchemotherapy AT friedmandaniele noinkontumorinbreastconservingsurgeryafterneoadjuvantchemotherapy AT fregattipiero noinkontumorinbreastconservingsurgeryafterneoadjuvantchemotherapy |