Cargando…

Review of Heat Transfer Analysis in Different Cavity Geometries with and without Nanofluids

Many strategies have been attempted for accomplishing the needed changes in the heat-transfer rate in closed cavities in recent years. Some strategies used include the addition of flexible or hard partitions to the cavities (to split them into various pieces), thickening the borders, providing fins...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rashid, Farhan Lafta, Hussein, Ahmed Kadhim, Malekshah, Emad Hasani, Abderrahmane, Aissa, Guedri, Kamel, Younis, Obai
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9320624/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35889705
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nano12142481
_version_ 1784755837515857920
author Rashid, Farhan Lafta
Hussein, Ahmed Kadhim
Malekshah, Emad Hasani
Abderrahmane, Aissa
Guedri, Kamel
Younis, Obai
author_facet Rashid, Farhan Lafta
Hussein, Ahmed Kadhim
Malekshah, Emad Hasani
Abderrahmane, Aissa
Guedri, Kamel
Younis, Obai
author_sort Rashid, Farhan Lafta
collection PubMed
description Many strategies have been attempted for accomplishing the needed changes in the heat-transfer rate in closed cavities in recent years. Some strategies used include the addition of flexible or hard partitions to the cavities (to split them into various pieces), thickening the borders, providing fins to the cavities, or altering the forms or cavity angles. Each of these methods may be used to increase or decrease heat transmission. Many computational and experimental investigations of heat transport in various cavity shapes have been conducted. The majority of studies focused on improving the thermal efficiency of heat transmission in various cavity containers. This paper introduced a review of experimental, numerical, and analytical studies related to heat transfer analyses in different geometries, such as circular, cylindrical, hexagonal, and rectangular cavities. Results of the evaluated studies indicate that the fin design increased heat transmission and sped up the melting time of the PCM; the optimal wind incidence angle for the maximum loss of combined convective heat depends on the tilt angle of the cavity and wind speed. The Nusselt number graphs behave differently when decreasing the Richardson number. Comparatively, the natural heat transfer process dominates at Ri = 10, but lid motion is absent at Ri = 1. For a given Ri and Pr, the cavity without a block performed better than the cavity with a square or circular block. The heat transfer coefficient at the heating sources has been established as a performance indicator. Hot source fins improve heat transmission and reduce gallium melting time.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9320624
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93206242022-07-27 Review of Heat Transfer Analysis in Different Cavity Geometries with and without Nanofluids Rashid, Farhan Lafta Hussein, Ahmed Kadhim Malekshah, Emad Hasani Abderrahmane, Aissa Guedri, Kamel Younis, Obai Nanomaterials (Basel) Review Many strategies have been attempted for accomplishing the needed changes in the heat-transfer rate in closed cavities in recent years. Some strategies used include the addition of flexible or hard partitions to the cavities (to split them into various pieces), thickening the borders, providing fins to the cavities, or altering the forms or cavity angles. Each of these methods may be used to increase or decrease heat transmission. Many computational and experimental investigations of heat transport in various cavity shapes have been conducted. The majority of studies focused on improving the thermal efficiency of heat transmission in various cavity containers. This paper introduced a review of experimental, numerical, and analytical studies related to heat transfer analyses in different geometries, such as circular, cylindrical, hexagonal, and rectangular cavities. Results of the evaluated studies indicate that the fin design increased heat transmission and sped up the melting time of the PCM; the optimal wind incidence angle for the maximum loss of combined convective heat depends on the tilt angle of the cavity and wind speed. The Nusselt number graphs behave differently when decreasing the Richardson number. Comparatively, the natural heat transfer process dominates at Ri = 10, but lid motion is absent at Ri = 1. For a given Ri and Pr, the cavity without a block performed better than the cavity with a square or circular block. The heat transfer coefficient at the heating sources has been established as a performance indicator. Hot source fins improve heat transmission and reduce gallium melting time. MDPI 2022-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9320624/ /pubmed/35889705 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nano12142481 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Rashid, Farhan Lafta
Hussein, Ahmed Kadhim
Malekshah, Emad Hasani
Abderrahmane, Aissa
Guedri, Kamel
Younis, Obai
Review of Heat Transfer Analysis in Different Cavity Geometries with and without Nanofluids
title Review of Heat Transfer Analysis in Different Cavity Geometries with and without Nanofluids
title_full Review of Heat Transfer Analysis in Different Cavity Geometries with and without Nanofluids
title_fullStr Review of Heat Transfer Analysis in Different Cavity Geometries with and without Nanofluids
title_full_unstemmed Review of Heat Transfer Analysis in Different Cavity Geometries with and without Nanofluids
title_short Review of Heat Transfer Analysis in Different Cavity Geometries with and without Nanofluids
title_sort review of heat transfer analysis in different cavity geometries with and without nanofluids
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9320624/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35889705
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nano12142481
work_keys_str_mv AT rashidfarhanlafta reviewofheattransferanalysisindifferentcavitygeometrieswithandwithoutnanofluids
AT husseinahmedkadhim reviewofheattransferanalysisindifferentcavitygeometrieswithandwithoutnanofluids
AT malekshahemadhasani reviewofheattransferanalysisindifferentcavitygeometrieswithandwithoutnanofluids
AT abderrahmaneaissa reviewofheattransferanalysisindifferentcavitygeometrieswithandwithoutnanofluids
AT guedrikamel reviewofheattransferanalysisindifferentcavitygeometrieswithandwithoutnanofluids
AT younisobai reviewofheattransferanalysisindifferentcavitygeometrieswithandwithoutnanofluids