Cargando…
Unipolar Electrogram-Guided versus Lesion Size Index-Guided Catheter Ablation in Patients with Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
Background: This research explores the relationship between the unipolar electrogram (UP-EGM) and lesion size index (LSI) in different regions of continuous circular lesions (CCLs) and to assess the safety and efficacy of UP-EGM-guided versus LSI-guided radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) in pat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9320701/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35877591 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcdd9070229 |
_version_ | 1784755855906832384 |
---|---|
author | Fu, Guohua He, Bin Wang, Binhao Feng, Mingjun Du, Xianfeng Liu, Jing Yu, Yibo Gao, Fang Zhuo, Weidong Xu, Yi Qi, Yingbo Chu, Huimin |
author_facet | Fu, Guohua He, Bin Wang, Binhao Feng, Mingjun Du, Xianfeng Liu, Jing Yu, Yibo Gao, Fang Zhuo, Weidong Xu, Yi Qi, Yingbo Chu, Huimin |
author_sort | Fu, Guohua |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: This research explores the relationship between the unipolar electrogram (UP-EGM) and lesion size index (LSI) in different regions of continuous circular lesions (CCLs) and to assess the safety and efficacy of UP-EGM-guided versus LSI-guided radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). Methods: A total of 120 patients with drug-refractory PAF who underwent index RFCA were scheduled to be consecutively included from March 2020 to April 2021. All the patients were randomly divided 1:1 into two groups: the UP-EGM group and the LSI group. The first-pass PVI rate, acute PVI rate, and the sinus rhythm maintenance rate were compared. Results: A total of 120 patients with PAF were included in the study: the UP-EGM group (n = 60) and the LSI group (n = 60). All the LSI values in the UP-EGM group were less than those in the corresponding regions in the LSI group (all p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in the first-pass PVI rate and acute PVI rate between the two groups. After a mean follow-up period of 11.31 ± 1.70 months, the sinus rhythm maintenance rate in the UP-EGM group was comparable to that in the LSI group (90% vs. 91.7%, p = 0.752). Conclusion: UP-EGM-guided and LSI-guided RFCA are both effective and safe in patients with PAF. However, UP-EGM may be more suitable than LSI for guiding individual RFCA. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9320701 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93207012022-07-27 Unipolar Electrogram-Guided versus Lesion Size Index-Guided Catheter Ablation in Patients with Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Fu, Guohua He, Bin Wang, Binhao Feng, Mingjun Du, Xianfeng Liu, Jing Yu, Yibo Gao, Fang Zhuo, Weidong Xu, Yi Qi, Yingbo Chu, Huimin J Cardiovasc Dev Dis Article Background: This research explores the relationship between the unipolar electrogram (UP-EGM) and lesion size index (LSI) in different regions of continuous circular lesions (CCLs) and to assess the safety and efficacy of UP-EGM-guided versus LSI-guided radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). Methods: A total of 120 patients with drug-refractory PAF who underwent index RFCA were scheduled to be consecutively included from March 2020 to April 2021. All the patients were randomly divided 1:1 into two groups: the UP-EGM group and the LSI group. The first-pass PVI rate, acute PVI rate, and the sinus rhythm maintenance rate were compared. Results: A total of 120 patients with PAF were included in the study: the UP-EGM group (n = 60) and the LSI group (n = 60). All the LSI values in the UP-EGM group were less than those in the corresponding regions in the LSI group (all p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in the first-pass PVI rate and acute PVI rate between the two groups. After a mean follow-up period of 11.31 ± 1.70 months, the sinus rhythm maintenance rate in the UP-EGM group was comparable to that in the LSI group (90% vs. 91.7%, p = 0.752). Conclusion: UP-EGM-guided and LSI-guided RFCA are both effective and safe in patients with PAF. However, UP-EGM may be more suitable than LSI for guiding individual RFCA. MDPI 2022-07-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9320701/ /pubmed/35877591 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcdd9070229 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Fu, Guohua He, Bin Wang, Binhao Feng, Mingjun Du, Xianfeng Liu, Jing Yu, Yibo Gao, Fang Zhuo, Weidong Xu, Yi Qi, Yingbo Chu, Huimin Unipolar Electrogram-Guided versus Lesion Size Index-Guided Catheter Ablation in Patients with Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation |
title | Unipolar Electrogram-Guided versus Lesion Size Index-Guided Catheter Ablation in Patients with Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation |
title_full | Unipolar Electrogram-Guided versus Lesion Size Index-Guided Catheter Ablation in Patients with Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation |
title_fullStr | Unipolar Electrogram-Guided versus Lesion Size Index-Guided Catheter Ablation in Patients with Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation |
title_full_unstemmed | Unipolar Electrogram-Guided versus Lesion Size Index-Guided Catheter Ablation in Patients with Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation |
title_short | Unipolar Electrogram-Guided versus Lesion Size Index-Guided Catheter Ablation in Patients with Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation |
title_sort | unipolar electrogram-guided versus lesion size index-guided catheter ablation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9320701/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35877591 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcdd9070229 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fuguohua unipolarelectrogramguidedversuslesionsizeindexguidedcatheterablationinpatientswithparoxysmalatrialfibrillation AT hebin unipolarelectrogramguidedversuslesionsizeindexguidedcatheterablationinpatientswithparoxysmalatrialfibrillation AT wangbinhao unipolarelectrogramguidedversuslesionsizeindexguidedcatheterablationinpatientswithparoxysmalatrialfibrillation AT fengmingjun unipolarelectrogramguidedversuslesionsizeindexguidedcatheterablationinpatientswithparoxysmalatrialfibrillation AT duxianfeng unipolarelectrogramguidedversuslesionsizeindexguidedcatheterablationinpatientswithparoxysmalatrialfibrillation AT liujing unipolarelectrogramguidedversuslesionsizeindexguidedcatheterablationinpatientswithparoxysmalatrialfibrillation AT yuyibo unipolarelectrogramguidedversuslesionsizeindexguidedcatheterablationinpatientswithparoxysmalatrialfibrillation AT gaofang unipolarelectrogramguidedversuslesionsizeindexguidedcatheterablationinpatientswithparoxysmalatrialfibrillation AT zhuoweidong unipolarelectrogramguidedversuslesionsizeindexguidedcatheterablationinpatientswithparoxysmalatrialfibrillation AT xuyi unipolarelectrogramguidedversuslesionsizeindexguidedcatheterablationinpatientswithparoxysmalatrialfibrillation AT qiyingbo unipolarelectrogramguidedversuslesionsizeindexguidedcatheterablationinpatientswithparoxysmalatrialfibrillation AT chuhuimin unipolarelectrogramguidedversuslesionsizeindexguidedcatheterablationinpatientswithparoxysmalatrialfibrillation |