Cargando…

Unipolar Electrogram-Guided versus Lesion Size Index-Guided Catheter Ablation in Patients with Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

Background: This research explores the relationship between the unipolar electrogram (UP-EGM) and lesion size index (LSI) in different regions of continuous circular lesions (CCLs) and to assess the safety and efficacy of UP-EGM-guided versus LSI-guided radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) in pat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fu, Guohua, He, Bin, Wang, Binhao, Feng, Mingjun, Du, Xianfeng, Liu, Jing, Yu, Yibo, Gao, Fang, Zhuo, Weidong, Xu, Yi, Qi, Yingbo, Chu, Huimin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9320701/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35877591
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcdd9070229
_version_ 1784755855906832384
author Fu, Guohua
He, Bin
Wang, Binhao
Feng, Mingjun
Du, Xianfeng
Liu, Jing
Yu, Yibo
Gao, Fang
Zhuo, Weidong
Xu, Yi
Qi, Yingbo
Chu, Huimin
author_facet Fu, Guohua
He, Bin
Wang, Binhao
Feng, Mingjun
Du, Xianfeng
Liu, Jing
Yu, Yibo
Gao, Fang
Zhuo, Weidong
Xu, Yi
Qi, Yingbo
Chu, Huimin
author_sort Fu, Guohua
collection PubMed
description Background: This research explores the relationship between the unipolar electrogram (UP-EGM) and lesion size index (LSI) in different regions of continuous circular lesions (CCLs) and to assess the safety and efficacy of UP-EGM-guided versus LSI-guided radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). Methods: A total of 120 patients with drug-refractory PAF who underwent index RFCA were scheduled to be consecutively included from March 2020 to April 2021. All the patients were randomly divided 1:1 into two groups: the UP-EGM group and the LSI group. The first-pass PVI rate, acute PVI rate, and the sinus rhythm maintenance rate were compared. Results: A total of 120 patients with PAF were included in the study: the UP-EGM group (n = 60) and the LSI group (n = 60). All the LSI values in the UP-EGM group were less than those in the corresponding regions in the LSI group (all p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in the first-pass PVI rate and acute PVI rate between the two groups. After a mean follow-up period of 11.31 ± 1.70 months, the sinus rhythm maintenance rate in the UP-EGM group was comparable to that in the LSI group (90% vs. 91.7%, p = 0.752). Conclusion: UP-EGM-guided and LSI-guided RFCA are both effective and safe in patients with PAF. However, UP-EGM may be more suitable than LSI for guiding individual RFCA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9320701
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93207012022-07-27 Unipolar Electrogram-Guided versus Lesion Size Index-Guided Catheter Ablation in Patients with Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Fu, Guohua He, Bin Wang, Binhao Feng, Mingjun Du, Xianfeng Liu, Jing Yu, Yibo Gao, Fang Zhuo, Weidong Xu, Yi Qi, Yingbo Chu, Huimin J Cardiovasc Dev Dis Article Background: This research explores the relationship between the unipolar electrogram (UP-EGM) and lesion size index (LSI) in different regions of continuous circular lesions (CCLs) and to assess the safety and efficacy of UP-EGM-guided versus LSI-guided radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). Methods: A total of 120 patients with drug-refractory PAF who underwent index RFCA were scheduled to be consecutively included from March 2020 to April 2021. All the patients were randomly divided 1:1 into two groups: the UP-EGM group and the LSI group. The first-pass PVI rate, acute PVI rate, and the sinus rhythm maintenance rate were compared. Results: A total of 120 patients with PAF were included in the study: the UP-EGM group (n = 60) and the LSI group (n = 60). All the LSI values in the UP-EGM group were less than those in the corresponding regions in the LSI group (all p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in the first-pass PVI rate and acute PVI rate between the two groups. After a mean follow-up period of 11.31 ± 1.70 months, the sinus rhythm maintenance rate in the UP-EGM group was comparable to that in the LSI group (90% vs. 91.7%, p = 0.752). Conclusion: UP-EGM-guided and LSI-guided RFCA are both effective and safe in patients with PAF. However, UP-EGM may be more suitable than LSI for guiding individual RFCA. MDPI 2022-07-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9320701/ /pubmed/35877591 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcdd9070229 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Fu, Guohua
He, Bin
Wang, Binhao
Feng, Mingjun
Du, Xianfeng
Liu, Jing
Yu, Yibo
Gao, Fang
Zhuo, Weidong
Xu, Yi
Qi, Yingbo
Chu, Huimin
Unipolar Electrogram-Guided versus Lesion Size Index-Guided Catheter Ablation in Patients with Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
title Unipolar Electrogram-Guided versus Lesion Size Index-Guided Catheter Ablation in Patients with Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
title_full Unipolar Electrogram-Guided versus Lesion Size Index-Guided Catheter Ablation in Patients with Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
title_fullStr Unipolar Electrogram-Guided versus Lesion Size Index-Guided Catheter Ablation in Patients with Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
title_full_unstemmed Unipolar Electrogram-Guided versus Lesion Size Index-Guided Catheter Ablation in Patients with Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
title_short Unipolar Electrogram-Guided versus Lesion Size Index-Guided Catheter Ablation in Patients with Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
title_sort unipolar electrogram-guided versus lesion size index-guided catheter ablation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9320701/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35877591
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcdd9070229
work_keys_str_mv AT fuguohua unipolarelectrogramguidedversuslesionsizeindexguidedcatheterablationinpatientswithparoxysmalatrialfibrillation
AT hebin unipolarelectrogramguidedversuslesionsizeindexguidedcatheterablationinpatientswithparoxysmalatrialfibrillation
AT wangbinhao unipolarelectrogramguidedversuslesionsizeindexguidedcatheterablationinpatientswithparoxysmalatrialfibrillation
AT fengmingjun unipolarelectrogramguidedversuslesionsizeindexguidedcatheterablationinpatientswithparoxysmalatrialfibrillation
AT duxianfeng unipolarelectrogramguidedversuslesionsizeindexguidedcatheterablationinpatientswithparoxysmalatrialfibrillation
AT liujing unipolarelectrogramguidedversuslesionsizeindexguidedcatheterablationinpatientswithparoxysmalatrialfibrillation
AT yuyibo unipolarelectrogramguidedversuslesionsizeindexguidedcatheterablationinpatientswithparoxysmalatrialfibrillation
AT gaofang unipolarelectrogramguidedversuslesionsizeindexguidedcatheterablationinpatientswithparoxysmalatrialfibrillation
AT zhuoweidong unipolarelectrogramguidedversuslesionsizeindexguidedcatheterablationinpatientswithparoxysmalatrialfibrillation
AT xuyi unipolarelectrogramguidedversuslesionsizeindexguidedcatheterablationinpatientswithparoxysmalatrialfibrillation
AT qiyingbo unipolarelectrogramguidedversuslesionsizeindexguidedcatheterablationinpatientswithparoxysmalatrialfibrillation
AT chuhuimin unipolarelectrogramguidedversuslesionsizeindexguidedcatheterablationinpatientswithparoxysmalatrialfibrillation