Cargando…

Six‐month outcomes in postapproval HeartMate3 patients: A single‐center US experience

BACKGROUND: The European CE Mark approval study and the MOMENTUM 3 trial demonstrated safety and a reduction in hemocompatibility‐related adverse events with the use of HeartMate 3 (HM3) device. This single‐center study investigated the real‐world experience in HM3 patients since FDA approval. METHO...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bansal, Aditya, Akhtar, Faisal, Desai, Sapna, Velasco‐Gonzalez, Cruz, Bansal, Anirudh, Teagle, Angie, Shridhar, Avni, Webre, Karen, Ostrow, Sheila, Fary, David, Parrino, Patrick Eugene
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9320844/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35385586
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jocs.16452
_version_ 1784755892071170048
author Bansal, Aditya
Akhtar, Faisal
Desai, Sapna
Velasco‐Gonzalez, Cruz
Bansal, Anirudh
Teagle, Angie
Shridhar, Avni
Webre, Karen
Ostrow, Sheila
Fary, David
Parrino, Patrick Eugene
author_facet Bansal, Aditya
Akhtar, Faisal
Desai, Sapna
Velasco‐Gonzalez, Cruz
Bansal, Anirudh
Teagle, Angie
Shridhar, Avni
Webre, Karen
Ostrow, Sheila
Fary, David
Parrino, Patrick Eugene
author_sort Bansal, Aditya
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The European CE Mark approval study and the MOMENTUM 3 trial demonstrated safety and a reduction in hemocompatibility‐related adverse events with the use of HeartMate 3 (HM3) device. This single‐center study investigated the real‐world experience in HM3 patients since FDA approval. METHODS: This retrospective, observational study included patients implanted with the HM3 LVAD as a primary implant between October 2017 and March 2020. Patients were divided into trial group and postapproval group. The primary endpoint was survival at 6 months. Secondary endpoints were adverse events including pump thrombosis (requiring pump exchange), stroke, renal failure, acute limb ischemia, re‐exploratory for bleeding, gastrointestinal bleeding, right ventricular failure, and driveline infection. RESULTS: A total of 189 patients were implanted with HM3 device during the study period. 174 patients met the inclusion criteria: 82 patients in the trial group and 92 patients in the postapproval group. The postapproval group had younger patients, higher preoperative mean international normalized ratio, and greater numbers of patients with bridge to transplant (BTT) indications, IINTERMACS profile 1, and use of mechanical assist devices (other than IABP) than the trial group. Other characteristics between the two groups were comparable. Overall survival at 6 months in the postapproval group was 93.3% versus 93.8% (p = .88). The postapproval group demonstrated a statistically significant lower incidence of re‐explorative surgery for bleeding (10.9% vs. 46.3, p = .01) than the trial group. CONCLUSION: In this single‐center study, the real‐world 6‐month survival in the postapproval group was comparable to the trial results. Further studies are needed to monitor long‐term outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9320844
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93208442022-07-30 Six‐month outcomes in postapproval HeartMate3 patients: A single‐center US experience Bansal, Aditya Akhtar, Faisal Desai, Sapna Velasco‐Gonzalez, Cruz Bansal, Anirudh Teagle, Angie Shridhar, Avni Webre, Karen Ostrow, Sheila Fary, David Parrino, Patrick Eugene J Card Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: The European CE Mark approval study and the MOMENTUM 3 trial demonstrated safety and a reduction in hemocompatibility‐related adverse events with the use of HeartMate 3 (HM3) device. This single‐center study investigated the real‐world experience in HM3 patients since FDA approval. METHODS: This retrospective, observational study included patients implanted with the HM3 LVAD as a primary implant between October 2017 and March 2020. Patients were divided into trial group and postapproval group. The primary endpoint was survival at 6 months. Secondary endpoints were adverse events including pump thrombosis (requiring pump exchange), stroke, renal failure, acute limb ischemia, re‐exploratory for bleeding, gastrointestinal bleeding, right ventricular failure, and driveline infection. RESULTS: A total of 189 patients were implanted with HM3 device during the study period. 174 patients met the inclusion criteria: 82 patients in the trial group and 92 patients in the postapproval group. The postapproval group had younger patients, higher preoperative mean international normalized ratio, and greater numbers of patients with bridge to transplant (BTT) indications, IINTERMACS profile 1, and use of mechanical assist devices (other than IABP) than the trial group. Other characteristics between the two groups were comparable. Overall survival at 6 months in the postapproval group was 93.3% versus 93.8% (p = .88). The postapproval group demonstrated a statistically significant lower incidence of re‐explorative surgery for bleeding (10.9% vs. 46.3, p = .01) than the trial group. CONCLUSION: In this single‐center study, the real‐world 6‐month survival in the postapproval group was comparable to the trial results. Further studies are needed to monitor long‐term outcomes. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-04-06 2022-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9320844/ /pubmed/35385586 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jocs.16452 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Cardiac Surgery published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Bansal, Aditya
Akhtar, Faisal
Desai, Sapna
Velasco‐Gonzalez, Cruz
Bansal, Anirudh
Teagle, Angie
Shridhar, Avni
Webre, Karen
Ostrow, Sheila
Fary, David
Parrino, Patrick Eugene
Six‐month outcomes in postapproval HeartMate3 patients: A single‐center US experience
title Six‐month outcomes in postapproval HeartMate3 patients: A single‐center US experience
title_full Six‐month outcomes in postapproval HeartMate3 patients: A single‐center US experience
title_fullStr Six‐month outcomes in postapproval HeartMate3 patients: A single‐center US experience
title_full_unstemmed Six‐month outcomes in postapproval HeartMate3 patients: A single‐center US experience
title_short Six‐month outcomes in postapproval HeartMate3 patients: A single‐center US experience
title_sort six‐month outcomes in postapproval heartmate3 patients: a single‐center us experience
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9320844/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35385586
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jocs.16452
work_keys_str_mv AT bansaladitya sixmonthoutcomesinpostapprovalheartmate3patientsasinglecenterusexperience
AT akhtarfaisal sixmonthoutcomesinpostapprovalheartmate3patientsasinglecenterusexperience
AT desaisapna sixmonthoutcomesinpostapprovalheartmate3patientsasinglecenterusexperience
AT velascogonzalezcruz sixmonthoutcomesinpostapprovalheartmate3patientsasinglecenterusexperience
AT bansalanirudh sixmonthoutcomesinpostapprovalheartmate3patientsasinglecenterusexperience
AT teagleangie sixmonthoutcomesinpostapprovalheartmate3patientsasinglecenterusexperience
AT shridharavni sixmonthoutcomesinpostapprovalheartmate3patientsasinglecenterusexperience
AT webrekaren sixmonthoutcomesinpostapprovalheartmate3patientsasinglecenterusexperience
AT ostrowsheila sixmonthoutcomesinpostapprovalheartmate3patientsasinglecenterusexperience
AT farydavid sixmonthoutcomesinpostapprovalheartmate3patientsasinglecenterusexperience
AT parrinopatrickeugene sixmonthoutcomesinpostapprovalheartmate3patientsasinglecenterusexperience