Cargando…

Comparative Evaluation of Real-Time Screening PCR Assays for Giardia duodenalis and of Assays Discriminating the Assemblages A and B

Due to superior sensitivity compared to traditional microscopy, real-time PCR has been well established for the diagnosis of Giardia duodenalis in human stool samples. In this study, screening real-time PCRs for different target genes of G. duodenalis, i.e., the 18S rRNA gene, the gdh (glutamate deh...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Weinreich, Felix, Hahn, Andreas, Eberhardt, Kirsten Alexandra, Kann, Simone, Feldt, Torsten, Sarfo, Fred Stephen, Di Cristanziano, Veronica, Frickmann, Hagen, Loderstädt, Ulrike
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9321168/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35889028
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10071310
_version_ 1784755972578738176
author Weinreich, Felix
Hahn, Andreas
Eberhardt, Kirsten Alexandra
Kann, Simone
Feldt, Torsten
Sarfo, Fred Stephen
Di Cristanziano, Veronica
Frickmann, Hagen
Loderstädt, Ulrike
author_facet Weinreich, Felix
Hahn, Andreas
Eberhardt, Kirsten Alexandra
Kann, Simone
Feldt, Torsten
Sarfo, Fred Stephen
Di Cristanziano, Veronica
Frickmann, Hagen
Loderstädt, Ulrike
author_sort Weinreich, Felix
collection PubMed
description Due to superior sensitivity compared to traditional microscopy, real-time PCR has been well established for the diagnosis of Giardia duodenalis in human stool samples. In this study, screening real-time PCRs for different target genes of G. duodenalis, i.e., the 18S rRNA gene, the gdh (glutamate dehydrogenase) gene and the bg (beta-giardin) gene, were comparatively assessed next to various real-time PCR assays for the discrimination of the assemblages A and B of G. duodenalis targeting the bg gene with and without locked nucleic acid–containing probes as well as the tpi (triose phosphate isomerase) gene. The screening PCRs were assessed by including 872 non-preselected samples with a high pre-test probability for G. duodenalis in the statistical analysis, while 53 G. duodenalis-positive samples as indicated by at least two screening PCRs were finally included in the assessment of the assemblage-specific PCRs. For the screening PCRs, sensitivity estimated with latent class analysis (LCA) ranged from 17.5% to 100%, specificity from 92.3% to 100% with an accuracy-adjusted prevalence of 7.2% for G. duodenalis within the non-preselected sample collection. In detail, sensitivity and specificity were 100% and 100% for the 18S rRNA gene-specific assay, 17.5% and 92.3% for the gdh gene-specific assay, and 31.7% and 100% for the bg gene-specific assay, respectively. Agreement kappa was slight with only 15.5%. For the assemblage-specific PCRs, estimated sensitivity ranged from 82.1% to 100%, specificity from 84.0% to 100% with nearly perfect agreement kappa of 90.1% for assemblage A and yet substantial agreement of 74.8% for assemblage B. In detail for assemblage A, sensitivity and specificity were 100% and 100% for the bg gene-specific assay without locked nucleic acids (LNA) as well as 100% and 97.8% for both the bg gene-specific assay with LNA and the tri gene-specific assay, respectively. For assemblage B, sensitivity and specificity were 100% and 100% for the bg gene-specific assay without LNA, 96.4% and 84.0% for the bg gene-specific assay with LNA, and 82.1% and 100% for the tri gene-specific assay, respectively. Within the assessed sample collection, the observed proportion comprised 15.1% G. duodenalis assemblage A, 52.8% G. duodenalis assemblage B and 32.1% non-resolved assemblages. Only little differences were observed regarding the cycle threshold (Ct) values when comparing the assays. In conclusion, best diagnostic accuracy was shown for an 18S rRNA gene-specific screening assay for G. duodenalis and for a differentiation assay discriminating the G. duodenalis assemblages A and B by targeting the bg gene with probes not containing locked nucleic acids. By adding additional highly specific competitor assays for confirmation testing, diagnostic specificity can be further increased on the cost of sensitivity if optimized specificity is desired.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9321168
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93211682022-07-27 Comparative Evaluation of Real-Time Screening PCR Assays for Giardia duodenalis and of Assays Discriminating the Assemblages A and B Weinreich, Felix Hahn, Andreas Eberhardt, Kirsten Alexandra Kann, Simone Feldt, Torsten Sarfo, Fred Stephen Di Cristanziano, Veronica Frickmann, Hagen Loderstädt, Ulrike Microorganisms Article Due to superior sensitivity compared to traditional microscopy, real-time PCR has been well established for the diagnosis of Giardia duodenalis in human stool samples. In this study, screening real-time PCRs for different target genes of G. duodenalis, i.e., the 18S rRNA gene, the gdh (glutamate dehydrogenase) gene and the bg (beta-giardin) gene, were comparatively assessed next to various real-time PCR assays for the discrimination of the assemblages A and B of G. duodenalis targeting the bg gene with and without locked nucleic acid–containing probes as well as the tpi (triose phosphate isomerase) gene. The screening PCRs were assessed by including 872 non-preselected samples with a high pre-test probability for G. duodenalis in the statistical analysis, while 53 G. duodenalis-positive samples as indicated by at least two screening PCRs were finally included in the assessment of the assemblage-specific PCRs. For the screening PCRs, sensitivity estimated with latent class analysis (LCA) ranged from 17.5% to 100%, specificity from 92.3% to 100% with an accuracy-adjusted prevalence of 7.2% for G. duodenalis within the non-preselected sample collection. In detail, sensitivity and specificity were 100% and 100% for the 18S rRNA gene-specific assay, 17.5% and 92.3% for the gdh gene-specific assay, and 31.7% and 100% for the bg gene-specific assay, respectively. Agreement kappa was slight with only 15.5%. For the assemblage-specific PCRs, estimated sensitivity ranged from 82.1% to 100%, specificity from 84.0% to 100% with nearly perfect agreement kappa of 90.1% for assemblage A and yet substantial agreement of 74.8% for assemblage B. In detail for assemblage A, sensitivity and specificity were 100% and 100% for the bg gene-specific assay without locked nucleic acids (LNA) as well as 100% and 97.8% for both the bg gene-specific assay with LNA and the tri gene-specific assay, respectively. For assemblage B, sensitivity and specificity were 100% and 100% for the bg gene-specific assay without LNA, 96.4% and 84.0% for the bg gene-specific assay with LNA, and 82.1% and 100% for the tri gene-specific assay, respectively. Within the assessed sample collection, the observed proportion comprised 15.1% G. duodenalis assemblage A, 52.8% G. duodenalis assemblage B and 32.1% non-resolved assemblages. Only little differences were observed regarding the cycle threshold (Ct) values when comparing the assays. In conclusion, best diagnostic accuracy was shown for an 18S rRNA gene-specific screening assay for G. duodenalis and for a differentiation assay discriminating the G. duodenalis assemblages A and B by targeting the bg gene with probes not containing locked nucleic acids. By adding additional highly specific competitor assays for confirmation testing, diagnostic specificity can be further increased on the cost of sensitivity if optimized specificity is desired. MDPI 2022-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9321168/ /pubmed/35889028 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10071310 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Weinreich, Felix
Hahn, Andreas
Eberhardt, Kirsten Alexandra
Kann, Simone
Feldt, Torsten
Sarfo, Fred Stephen
Di Cristanziano, Veronica
Frickmann, Hagen
Loderstädt, Ulrike
Comparative Evaluation of Real-Time Screening PCR Assays for Giardia duodenalis and of Assays Discriminating the Assemblages A and B
title Comparative Evaluation of Real-Time Screening PCR Assays for Giardia duodenalis and of Assays Discriminating the Assemblages A and B
title_full Comparative Evaluation of Real-Time Screening PCR Assays for Giardia duodenalis and of Assays Discriminating the Assemblages A and B
title_fullStr Comparative Evaluation of Real-Time Screening PCR Assays for Giardia duodenalis and of Assays Discriminating the Assemblages A and B
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Evaluation of Real-Time Screening PCR Assays for Giardia duodenalis and of Assays Discriminating the Assemblages A and B
title_short Comparative Evaluation of Real-Time Screening PCR Assays for Giardia duodenalis and of Assays Discriminating the Assemblages A and B
title_sort comparative evaluation of real-time screening pcr assays for giardia duodenalis and of assays discriminating the assemblages a and b
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9321168/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35889028
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10071310
work_keys_str_mv AT weinreichfelix comparativeevaluationofrealtimescreeningpcrassaysforgiardiaduodenalisandofassaysdiscriminatingtheassemblagesaandb
AT hahnandreas comparativeevaluationofrealtimescreeningpcrassaysforgiardiaduodenalisandofassaysdiscriminatingtheassemblagesaandb
AT eberhardtkirstenalexandra comparativeevaluationofrealtimescreeningpcrassaysforgiardiaduodenalisandofassaysdiscriminatingtheassemblagesaandb
AT kannsimone comparativeevaluationofrealtimescreeningpcrassaysforgiardiaduodenalisandofassaysdiscriminatingtheassemblagesaandb
AT feldttorsten comparativeevaluationofrealtimescreeningpcrassaysforgiardiaduodenalisandofassaysdiscriminatingtheassemblagesaandb
AT sarfofredstephen comparativeevaluationofrealtimescreeningpcrassaysforgiardiaduodenalisandofassaysdiscriminatingtheassemblagesaandb
AT dicristanzianoveronica comparativeevaluationofrealtimescreeningpcrassaysforgiardiaduodenalisandofassaysdiscriminatingtheassemblagesaandb
AT frickmannhagen comparativeevaluationofrealtimescreeningpcrassaysforgiardiaduodenalisandofassaysdiscriminatingtheassemblagesaandb
AT loderstadtulrike comparativeevaluationofrealtimescreeningpcrassaysforgiardiaduodenalisandofassaysdiscriminatingtheassemblagesaandb