Cargando…
An argument for pandemic risk management using a multidisciplinary One Health approach to governance: an Australian case study
The emergence of SARS-CoV-2 and the subsequent COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in significant global impact. However, COVID-19 is just one of several high-impact infectious diseases that emerged from wildlife and are linked to the human relationship with nature. The rate of emergence of new zoonoses...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9321311/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35883185 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12992-022-00850-4 |
_version_ | 1784756012682575872 |
---|---|
author | Woolaston, Katie Nay, Zoe Baker, Michelle L. Brockett, Callum Bruce, Mieghan Degeling, Chris Gilbert, Joshua Jackson, Bethany Johnson, Hope Peel, Alison Sahibzada, Shafi Oskam, Charlotte Hewitt, Chad L. |
author_facet | Woolaston, Katie Nay, Zoe Baker, Michelle L. Brockett, Callum Bruce, Mieghan Degeling, Chris Gilbert, Joshua Jackson, Bethany Johnson, Hope Peel, Alison Sahibzada, Shafi Oskam, Charlotte Hewitt, Chad L. |
author_sort | Woolaston, Katie |
collection | PubMed |
description | The emergence of SARS-CoV-2 and the subsequent COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in significant global impact. However, COVID-19 is just one of several high-impact infectious diseases that emerged from wildlife and are linked to the human relationship with nature. The rate of emergence of new zoonoses (diseases of animal origin) is increasing, driven by human-induced environmental changes that threaten biodiversity on a global scale. This increase is directly linked to environmental drivers including biodiversity loss, climate change and unsustainable resource extraction. Australia is a biodiversity hotspot and is subject to sustained and significant environmental change, increasing the risk of it being a location for pandemic origin. Moreover, the global integration of markets means that consumption trends in Australia contributes to the risk of disease spill-over in our regional neighbours in Asia-Pacific, and beyond. Despite the clear causal link between anthropogenic pressures on the environment and increasing pandemic risks, Australia’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic, like most of the world, has centred largely on public health strategies, with a clear focus on reactive management. Yet, the span of expertise and evidence relevant to the governance of pandemic risk management is much wider than public health and epidemiology. It involves animal/wildlife health, biosecurity, conservation sciences, social sciences, behavioural psychology, law, policy and economic analyses to name just a few. The authors are a team of multidisciplinary practitioners and researchers who have worked together to analyse, synthesise, and harmonise the links between pandemic risk management approaches and issues in different disciplines to provide a holistic overview of current practice, and conclude the need for reform in Australia. We discuss the adoption of a comprehensive and interdisciplinary ‘One Health’ approach to pandemic risk management in Australia. A key goal of the One Health approach is to be proactive in countering threats of emerging infectious diseases and zoonoses through a recognition of the interdependence between human, animal, and environmental health. Developing ways to implement a One Health approach to pandemic prevention would not only reduce the risk of future pandemics emerging in or entering Australia, but also provide a model for prevention strategies around the world. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9321311 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93213112022-07-27 An argument for pandemic risk management using a multidisciplinary One Health approach to governance: an Australian case study Woolaston, Katie Nay, Zoe Baker, Michelle L. Brockett, Callum Bruce, Mieghan Degeling, Chris Gilbert, Joshua Jackson, Bethany Johnson, Hope Peel, Alison Sahibzada, Shafi Oskam, Charlotte Hewitt, Chad L. Global Health Debate The emergence of SARS-CoV-2 and the subsequent COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in significant global impact. However, COVID-19 is just one of several high-impact infectious diseases that emerged from wildlife and are linked to the human relationship with nature. The rate of emergence of new zoonoses (diseases of animal origin) is increasing, driven by human-induced environmental changes that threaten biodiversity on a global scale. This increase is directly linked to environmental drivers including biodiversity loss, climate change and unsustainable resource extraction. Australia is a biodiversity hotspot and is subject to sustained and significant environmental change, increasing the risk of it being a location for pandemic origin. Moreover, the global integration of markets means that consumption trends in Australia contributes to the risk of disease spill-over in our regional neighbours in Asia-Pacific, and beyond. Despite the clear causal link between anthropogenic pressures on the environment and increasing pandemic risks, Australia’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic, like most of the world, has centred largely on public health strategies, with a clear focus on reactive management. Yet, the span of expertise and evidence relevant to the governance of pandemic risk management is much wider than public health and epidemiology. It involves animal/wildlife health, biosecurity, conservation sciences, social sciences, behavioural psychology, law, policy and economic analyses to name just a few. The authors are a team of multidisciplinary practitioners and researchers who have worked together to analyse, synthesise, and harmonise the links between pandemic risk management approaches and issues in different disciplines to provide a holistic overview of current practice, and conclude the need for reform in Australia. We discuss the adoption of a comprehensive and interdisciplinary ‘One Health’ approach to pandemic risk management in Australia. A key goal of the One Health approach is to be proactive in countering threats of emerging infectious diseases and zoonoses through a recognition of the interdependence between human, animal, and environmental health. Developing ways to implement a One Health approach to pandemic prevention would not only reduce the risk of future pandemics emerging in or entering Australia, but also provide a model for prevention strategies around the world. BioMed Central 2022-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9321311/ /pubmed/35883185 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12992-022-00850-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Debate Woolaston, Katie Nay, Zoe Baker, Michelle L. Brockett, Callum Bruce, Mieghan Degeling, Chris Gilbert, Joshua Jackson, Bethany Johnson, Hope Peel, Alison Sahibzada, Shafi Oskam, Charlotte Hewitt, Chad L. An argument for pandemic risk management using a multidisciplinary One Health approach to governance: an Australian case study |
title | An argument for pandemic risk management using a multidisciplinary One Health approach to governance: an Australian case study |
title_full | An argument for pandemic risk management using a multidisciplinary One Health approach to governance: an Australian case study |
title_fullStr | An argument for pandemic risk management using a multidisciplinary One Health approach to governance: an Australian case study |
title_full_unstemmed | An argument for pandemic risk management using a multidisciplinary One Health approach to governance: an Australian case study |
title_short | An argument for pandemic risk management using a multidisciplinary One Health approach to governance: an Australian case study |
title_sort | argument for pandemic risk management using a multidisciplinary one health approach to governance: an australian case study |
topic | Debate |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9321311/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35883185 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12992-022-00850-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT woolastonkatie anargumentforpandemicriskmanagementusingamultidisciplinaryonehealthapproachtogovernanceanaustraliancasestudy AT nayzoe anargumentforpandemicriskmanagementusingamultidisciplinaryonehealthapproachtogovernanceanaustraliancasestudy AT bakermichellel anargumentforpandemicriskmanagementusingamultidisciplinaryonehealthapproachtogovernanceanaustraliancasestudy AT brockettcallum anargumentforpandemicriskmanagementusingamultidisciplinaryonehealthapproachtogovernanceanaustraliancasestudy AT brucemieghan anargumentforpandemicriskmanagementusingamultidisciplinaryonehealthapproachtogovernanceanaustraliancasestudy AT degelingchris anargumentforpandemicriskmanagementusingamultidisciplinaryonehealthapproachtogovernanceanaustraliancasestudy AT gilbertjoshua anargumentforpandemicriskmanagementusingamultidisciplinaryonehealthapproachtogovernanceanaustraliancasestudy AT jacksonbethany anargumentforpandemicriskmanagementusingamultidisciplinaryonehealthapproachtogovernanceanaustraliancasestudy AT johnsonhope anargumentforpandemicriskmanagementusingamultidisciplinaryonehealthapproachtogovernanceanaustraliancasestudy AT peelalison anargumentforpandemicriskmanagementusingamultidisciplinaryonehealthapproachtogovernanceanaustraliancasestudy AT sahibzadashafi anargumentforpandemicriskmanagementusingamultidisciplinaryonehealthapproachtogovernanceanaustraliancasestudy AT oskamcharlotte anargumentforpandemicriskmanagementusingamultidisciplinaryonehealthapproachtogovernanceanaustraliancasestudy AT hewittchadl anargumentforpandemicriskmanagementusingamultidisciplinaryonehealthapproachtogovernanceanaustraliancasestudy AT woolastonkatie argumentforpandemicriskmanagementusingamultidisciplinaryonehealthapproachtogovernanceanaustraliancasestudy AT nayzoe argumentforpandemicriskmanagementusingamultidisciplinaryonehealthapproachtogovernanceanaustraliancasestudy AT bakermichellel argumentforpandemicriskmanagementusingamultidisciplinaryonehealthapproachtogovernanceanaustraliancasestudy AT brockettcallum argumentforpandemicriskmanagementusingamultidisciplinaryonehealthapproachtogovernanceanaustraliancasestudy AT brucemieghan argumentforpandemicriskmanagementusingamultidisciplinaryonehealthapproachtogovernanceanaustraliancasestudy AT degelingchris argumentforpandemicriskmanagementusingamultidisciplinaryonehealthapproachtogovernanceanaustraliancasestudy AT gilbertjoshua argumentforpandemicriskmanagementusingamultidisciplinaryonehealthapproachtogovernanceanaustraliancasestudy AT jacksonbethany argumentforpandemicriskmanagementusingamultidisciplinaryonehealthapproachtogovernanceanaustraliancasestudy AT johnsonhope argumentforpandemicriskmanagementusingamultidisciplinaryonehealthapproachtogovernanceanaustraliancasestudy AT peelalison argumentforpandemicriskmanagementusingamultidisciplinaryonehealthapproachtogovernanceanaustraliancasestudy AT sahibzadashafi argumentforpandemicriskmanagementusingamultidisciplinaryonehealthapproachtogovernanceanaustraliancasestudy AT oskamcharlotte argumentforpandemicriskmanagementusingamultidisciplinaryonehealthapproachtogovernanceanaustraliancasestudy AT hewittchadl argumentforpandemicriskmanagementusingamultidisciplinaryonehealthapproachtogovernanceanaustraliancasestudy |