Cargando…

Continuous Implant Load Monitoring to Assess Bone Healing Status—Evidence from Animal Testing

Background and Objectives: Fracture healing is currently assessed through qualitative evaluation of radiographic images, which is highly subjective in nature. Radiographs can only provide snapshots in time, which are limited due to logistics and radiation exposure. We recently proposed assessing the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Windolf, Markus, Varjas, Viktor, Gehweiler, Dominic, Schwyn, Ronald, Arens, Daniel, Constant, Caroline, Zeiter, Stephan, Richards, Robert Geoff, Ernst, Manuela
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9321316/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35888576
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina58070858
_version_ 1784756015076474880
author Windolf, Markus
Varjas, Viktor
Gehweiler, Dominic
Schwyn, Ronald
Arens, Daniel
Constant, Caroline
Zeiter, Stephan
Richards, Robert Geoff
Ernst, Manuela
author_facet Windolf, Markus
Varjas, Viktor
Gehweiler, Dominic
Schwyn, Ronald
Arens, Daniel
Constant, Caroline
Zeiter, Stephan
Richards, Robert Geoff
Ernst, Manuela
author_sort Windolf, Markus
collection PubMed
description Background and Objectives: Fracture healing is currently assessed through qualitative evaluation of radiographic images, which is highly subjective in nature. Radiographs can only provide snapshots in time, which are limited due to logistics and radiation exposure. We recently proposed assessing the bone healing status through continuous monitoring of the implant load, utilizing an implanted sensor system, the Fracture Monitor. The device telemetrically transmits statistically derived implant parameters via the patient’s mobile phone to assist physicians in diagnostics and treatment decision-making. This preclinical study aims to systematically investigate the device safety and performance in an animal setting. Materials and Methods: Mid-shaft tibial osteotomies of different sizes (0.6–30 mm) were created in eleven Swiss mountain sheep. The bones were stabilized with either a conventional Titanium or stainless-steel locking plate equipped with a Fracture Monitor. Data were continuously collected over the device’s lifetime. Conventional radiographs and clinical CT scans were taken longitudinally over the study period. The radiographs were systematically scored and CTs were evaluated for normalized bone volume in the defect. The animals were euthanized after 9 months. The sensor output was correlated with the radiologic parameters. Tissue samples from the device location were histologically examined. Results: The sensors functioned autonomously for 6.5–8.4 months until energy depletion. No macroscopic or microscopic adverse effects from device implantation were observed. The relative implant loads at 4 and 8 weeks post-operation correlated significantly with the radiographic scores and with the normalized bone volume metric. Conclusions: Continuous implant load monitoring appears as a relevant approach to support and objectify fracture healing assessments and carries a strong potential to enable patient-tailored rehabilitation in the future.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9321316
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93213162022-07-27 Continuous Implant Load Monitoring to Assess Bone Healing Status—Evidence from Animal Testing Windolf, Markus Varjas, Viktor Gehweiler, Dominic Schwyn, Ronald Arens, Daniel Constant, Caroline Zeiter, Stephan Richards, Robert Geoff Ernst, Manuela Medicina (Kaunas) Article Background and Objectives: Fracture healing is currently assessed through qualitative evaluation of radiographic images, which is highly subjective in nature. Radiographs can only provide snapshots in time, which are limited due to logistics and radiation exposure. We recently proposed assessing the bone healing status through continuous monitoring of the implant load, utilizing an implanted sensor system, the Fracture Monitor. The device telemetrically transmits statistically derived implant parameters via the patient’s mobile phone to assist physicians in diagnostics and treatment decision-making. This preclinical study aims to systematically investigate the device safety and performance in an animal setting. Materials and Methods: Mid-shaft tibial osteotomies of different sizes (0.6–30 mm) were created in eleven Swiss mountain sheep. The bones were stabilized with either a conventional Titanium or stainless-steel locking plate equipped with a Fracture Monitor. Data were continuously collected over the device’s lifetime. Conventional radiographs and clinical CT scans were taken longitudinally over the study period. The radiographs were systematically scored and CTs were evaluated for normalized bone volume in the defect. The animals were euthanized after 9 months. The sensor output was correlated with the radiologic parameters. Tissue samples from the device location were histologically examined. Results: The sensors functioned autonomously for 6.5–8.4 months until energy depletion. No macroscopic or microscopic adverse effects from device implantation were observed. The relative implant loads at 4 and 8 weeks post-operation correlated significantly with the radiographic scores and with the normalized bone volume metric. Conclusions: Continuous implant load monitoring appears as a relevant approach to support and objectify fracture healing assessments and carries a strong potential to enable patient-tailored rehabilitation in the future. MDPI 2022-06-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9321316/ /pubmed/35888576 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina58070858 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Windolf, Markus
Varjas, Viktor
Gehweiler, Dominic
Schwyn, Ronald
Arens, Daniel
Constant, Caroline
Zeiter, Stephan
Richards, Robert Geoff
Ernst, Manuela
Continuous Implant Load Monitoring to Assess Bone Healing Status—Evidence from Animal Testing
title Continuous Implant Load Monitoring to Assess Bone Healing Status—Evidence from Animal Testing
title_full Continuous Implant Load Monitoring to Assess Bone Healing Status—Evidence from Animal Testing
title_fullStr Continuous Implant Load Monitoring to Assess Bone Healing Status—Evidence from Animal Testing
title_full_unstemmed Continuous Implant Load Monitoring to Assess Bone Healing Status—Evidence from Animal Testing
title_short Continuous Implant Load Monitoring to Assess Bone Healing Status—Evidence from Animal Testing
title_sort continuous implant load monitoring to assess bone healing status—evidence from animal testing
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9321316/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35888576
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina58070858
work_keys_str_mv AT windolfmarkus continuousimplantloadmonitoringtoassessbonehealingstatusevidencefromanimaltesting
AT varjasviktor continuousimplantloadmonitoringtoassessbonehealingstatusevidencefromanimaltesting
AT gehweilerdominic continuousimplantloadmonitoringtoassessbonehealingstatusevidencefromanimaltesting
AT schwynronald continuousimplantloadmonitoringtoassessbonehealingstatusevidencefromanimaltesting
AT arensdaniel continuousimplantloadmonitoringtoassessbonehealingstatusevidencefromanimaltesting
AT constantcaroline continuousimplantloadmonitoringtoassessbonehealingstatusevidencefromanimaltesting
AT zeiterstephan continuousimplantloadmonitoringtoassessbonehealingstatusevidencefromanimaltesting
AT richardsrobertgeoff continuousimplantloadmonitoringtoassessbonehealingstatusevidencefromanimaltesting
AT ernstmanuela continuousimplantloadmonitoringtoassessbonehealingstatusevidencefromanimaltesting