Cargando…

Development of a Quantitative Preference Instrument for Person-Centered Dementia Care—Stage 2: Insights from a Formative Qualitative Study to Design and Pretest a Dementia-Friendly Analytic Hierarchy Process Survey

Person-centered care (PCC) requires knowledge about patient preferences. An analytic hierarchy process (AHP) is one approach to quantify, weigh and rank patient preferences suitable for People living with Dementia (PlwD), due to simple pairwise comparisons of individual criteria from a complex decis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mohr, Wiebke, Rädke, Anika, Afi, Adel, Mühlichen, Franka, Platen, Moritz, Scharf, Annelie, Michalowsky, Bernhard, Hoffmann, Wolfgang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9321359/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35886406
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19148554
_version_ 1784756025864224768
author Mohr, Wiebke
Rädke, Anika
Afi, Adel
Mühlichen, Franka
Platen, Moritz
Scharf, Annelie
Michalowsky, Bernhard
Hoffmann, Wolfgang
author_facet Mohr, Wiebke
Rädke, Anika
Afi, Adel
Mühlichen, Franka
Platen, Moritz
Scharf, Annelie
Michalowsky, Bernhard
Hoffmann, Wolfgang
author_sort Mohr, Wiebke
collection PubMed
description Person-centered care (PCC) requires knowledge about patient preferences. An analytic hierarchy process (AHP) is one approach to quantify, weigh and rank patient preferences suitable for People living with Dementia (PlwD), due to simple pairwise comparisons of individual criteria from a complex decision problem. The objective of the present study was to design and pretest a dementia-friendly AHP survey. Methods: Two expert panels consisting of n = 4 Dementia Care Managers and n = 4 physicians to ensure content-validity, and “thinking-aloud” interviews with n = 11 PlwD and n = 3 family caregivers to ensure the face validity of the AHP survey. Following a semi-structured interview guide, PlwD were asked to assess appropriateness and comprehensibility. Data, field notes and partial interview transcripts were analyzed with a constant comparative approach, and feedback was incorporated continuously until PlwD had no further comments or struggles with survey completion. Consistency ratios (CRs) were calculated with Microsoft(®) Excel and ExpertChoice Comparion(®). Results: Three main categories with sub-categories emerged: (1) Content: clear task introduction, (sub)criteria description, criteria homogeneity, (sub)criteria appropriateness, retest questions and sociodemography for heterogeneity; (2) Format: survey structure, pairwise comparison sequence, survey length, graphical design (incl. AHP scale), survey procedure explanation, survey assistance and response perspective; and (3) Layout: easy wording, short sentences and visual aids. Individual CRs ranged from 0.08 to 0.859, and the consolidated CR was 0.37 (0.038). Conclusions: Our formative qualitative study provides initial data for the design of a dementia-friendly AHP survey. Consideration of our findings may contribute to face and content validity in future quantitative preference research in dementia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9321359
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93213592022-07-27 Development of a Quantitative Preference Instrument for Person-Centered Dementia Care—Stage 2: Insights from a Formative Qualitative Study to Design and Pretest a Dementia-Friendly Analytic Hierarchy Process Survey Mohr, Wiebke Rädke, Anika Afi, Adel Mühlichen, Franka Platen, Moritz Scharf, Annelie Michalowsky, Bernhard Hoffmann, Wolfgang Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Person-centered care (PCC) requires knowledge about patient preferences. An analytic hierarchy process (AHP) is one approach to quantify, weigh and rank patient preferences suitable for People living with Dementia (PlwD), due to simple pairwise comparisons of individual criteria from a complex decision problem. The objective of the present study was to design and pretest a dementia-friendly AHP survey. Methods: Two expert panels consisting of n = 4 Dementia Care Managers and n = 4 physicians to ensure content-validity, and “thinking-aloud” interviews with n = 11 PlwD and n = 3 family caregivers to ensure the face validity of the AHP survey. Following a semi-structured interview guide, PlwD were asked to assess appropriateness and comprehensibility. Data, field notes and partial interview transcripts were analyzed with a constant comparative approach, and feedback was incorporated continuously until PlwD had no further comments or struggles with survey completion. Consistency ratios (CRs) were calculated with Microsoft(®) Excel and ExpertChoice Comparion(®). Results: Three main categories with sub-categories emerged: (1) Content: clear task introduction, (sub)criteria description, criteria homogeneity, (sub)criteria appropriateness, retest questions and sociodemography for heterogeneity; (2) Format: survey structure, pairwise comparison sequence, survey length, graphical design (incl. AHP scale), survey procedure explanation, survey assistance and response perspective; and (3) Layout: easy wording, short sentences and visual aids. Individual CRs ranged from 0.08 to 0.859, and the consolidated CR was 0.37 (0.038). Conclusions: Our formative qualitative study provides initial data for the design of a dementia-friendly AHP survey. Consideration of our findings may contribute to face and content validity in future quantitative preference research in dementia. MDPI 2022-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9321359/ /pubmed/35886406 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19148554 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Mohr, Wiebke
Rädke, Anika
Afi, Adel
Mühlichen, Franka
Platen, Moritz
Scharf, Annelie
Michalowsky, Bernhard
Hoffmann, Wolfgang
Development of a Quantitative Preference Instrument for Person-Centered Dementia Care—Stage 2: Insights from a Formative Qualitative Study to Design and Pretest a Dementia-Friendly Analytic Hierarchy Process Survey
title Development of a Quantitative Preference Instrument for Person-Centered Dementia Care—Stage 2: Insights from a Formative Qualitative Study to Design and Pretest a Dementia-Friendly Analytic Hierarchy Process Survey
title_full Development of a Quantitative Preference Instrument for Person-Centered Dementia Care—Stage 2: Insights from a Formative Qualitative Study to Design and Pretest a Dementia-Friendly Analytic Hierarchy Process Survey
title_fullStr Development of a Quantitative Preference Instrument for Person-Centered Dementia Care—Stage 2: Insights from a Formative Qualitative Study to Design and Pretest a Dementia-Friendly Analytic Hierarchy Process Survey
title_full_unstemmed Development of a Quantitative Preference Instrument for Person-Centered Dementia Care—Stage 2: Insights from a Formative Qualitative Study to Design and Pretest a Dementia-Friendly Analytic Hierarchy Process Survey
title_short Development of a Quantitative Preference Instrument for Person-Centered Dementia Care—Stage 2: Insights from a Formative Qualitative Study to Design and Pretest a Dementia-Friendly Analytic Hierarchy Process Survey
title_sort development of a quantitative preference instrument for person-centered dementia care—stage 2: insights from a formative qualitative study to design and pretest a dementia-friendly analytic hierarchy process survey
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9321359/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35886406
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19148554
work_keys_str_mv AT mohrwiebke developmentofaquantitativepreferenceinstrumentforpersoncentereddementiacarestage2insightsfromaformativequalitativestudytodesignandpretestadementiafriendlyanalytichierarchyprocesssurvey
AT radkeanika developmentofaquantitativepreferenceinstrumentforpersoncentereddementiacarestage2insightsfromaformativequalitativestudytodesignandpretestadementiafriendlyanalytichierarchyprocesssurvey
AT afiadel developmentofaquantitativepreferenceinstrumentforpersoncentereddementiacarestage2insightsfromaformativequalitativestudytodesignandpretestadementiafriendlyanalytichierarchyprocesssurvey
AT muhlichenfranka developmentofaquantitativepreferenceinstrumentforpersoncentereddementiacarestage2insightsfromaformativequalitativestudytodesignandpretestadementiafriendlyanalytichierarchyprocesssurvey
AT platenmoritz developmentofaquantitativepreferenceinstrumentforpersoncentereddementiacarestage2insightsfromaformativequalitativestudytodesignandpretestadementiafriendlyanalytichierarchyprocesssurvey
AT scharfannelie developmentofaquantitativepreferenceinstrumentforpersoncentereddementiacarestage2insightsfromaformativequalitativestudytodesignandpretestadementiafriendlyanalytichierarchyprocesssurvey
AT michalowskybernhard developmentofaquantitativepreferenceinstrumentforpersoncentereddementiacarestage2insightsfromaformativequalitativestudytodesignandpretestadementiafriendlyanalytichierarchyprocesssurvey
AT hoffmannwolfgang developmentofaquantitativepreferenceinstrumentforpersoncentereddementiacarestage2insightsfromaformativequalitativestudytodesignandpretestadementiafriendlyanalytichierarchyprocesssurvey