Cargando…
Development of a Quantitative Preference Instrument for Person-Centered Dementia Care—Stage 2: Insights from a Formative Qualitative Study to Design and Pretest a Dementia-Friendly Analytic Hierarchy Process Survey
Person-centered care (PCC) requires knowledge about patient preferences. An analytic hierarchy process (AHP) is one approach to quantify, weigh and rank patient preferences suitable for People living with Dementia (PlwD), due to simple pairwise comparisons of individual criteria from a complex decis...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9321359/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35886406 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19148554 |
_version_ | 1784756025864224768 |
---|---|
author | Mohr, Wiebke Rädke, Anika Afi, Adel Mühlichen, Franka Platen, Moritz Scharf, Annelie Michalowsky, Bernhard Hoffmann, Wolfgang |
author_facet | Mohr, Wiebke Rädke, Anika Afi, Adel Mühlichen, Franka Platen, Moritz Scharf, Annelie Michalowsky, Bernhard Hoffmann, Wolfgang |
author_sort | Mohr, Wiebke |
collection | PubMed |
description | Person-centered care (PCC) requires knowledge about patient preferences. An analytic hierarchy process (AHP) is one approach to quantify, weigh and rank patient preferences suitable for People living with Dementia (PlwD), due to simple pairwise comparisons of individual criteria from a complex decision problem. The objective of the present study was to design and pretest a dementia-friendly AHP survey. Methods: Two expert panels consisting of n = 4 Dementia Care Managers and n = 4 physicians to ensure content-validity, and “thinking-aloud” interviews with n = 11 PlwD and n = 3 family caregivers to ensure the face validity of the AHP survey. Following a semi-structured interview guide, PlwD were asked to assess appropriateness and comprehensibility. Data, field notes and partial interview transcripts were analyzed with a constant comparative approach, and feedback was incorporated continuously until PlwD had no further comments or struggles with survey completion. Consistency ratios (CRs) were calculated with Microsoft(®) Excel and ExpertChoice Comparion(®). Results: Three main categories with sub-categories emerged: (1) Content: clear task introduction, (sub)criteria description, criteria homogeneity, (sub)criteria appropriateness, retest questions and sociodemography for heterogeneity; (2) Format: survey structure, pairwise comparison sequence, survey length, graphical design (incl. AHP scale), survey procedure explanation, survey assistance and response perspective; and (3) Layout: easy wording, short sentences and visual aids. Individual CRs ranged from 0.08 to 0.859, and the consolidated CR was 0.37 (0.038). Conclusions: Our formative qualitative study provides initial data for the design of a dementia-friendly AHP survey. Consideration of our findings may contribute to face and content validity in future quantitative preference research in dementia. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9321359 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93213592022-07-27 Development of a Quantitative Preference Instrument for Person-Centered Dementia Care—Stage 2: Insights from a Formative Qualitative Study to Design and Pretest a Dementia-Friendly Analytic Hierarchy Process Survey Mohr, Wiebke Rädke, Anika Afi, Adel Mühlichen, Franka Platen, Moritz Scharf, Annelie Michalowsky, Bernhard Hoffmann, Wolfgang Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Person-centered care (PCC) requires knowledge about patient preferences. An analytic hierarchy process (AHP) is one approach to quantify, weigh and rank patient preferences suitable for People living with Dementia (PlwD), due to simple pairwise comparisons of individual criteria from a complex decision problem. The objective of the present study was to design and pretest a dementia-friendly AHP survey. Methods: Two expert panels consisting of n = 4 Dementia Care Managers and n = 4 physicians to ensure content-validity, and “thinking-aloud” interviews with n = 11 PlwD and n = 3 family caregivers to ensure the face validity of the AHP survey. Following a semi-structured interview guide, PlwD were asked to assess appropriateness and comprehensibility. Data, field notes and partial interview transcripts were analyzed with a constant comparative approach, and feedback was incorporated continuously until PlwD had no further comments or struggles with survey completion. Consistency ratios (CRs) were calculated with Microsoft(®) Excel and ExpertChoice Comparion(®). Results: Three main categories with sub-categories emerged: (1) Content: clear task introduction, (sub)criteria description, criteria homogeneity, (sub)criteria appropriateness, retest questions and sociodemography for heterogeneity; (2) Format: survey structure, pairwise comparison sequence, survey length, graphical design (incl. AHP scale), survey procedure explanation, survey assistance and response perspective; and (3) Layout: easy wording, short sentences and visual aids. Individual CRs ranged from 0.08 to 0.859, and the consolidated CR was 0.37 (0.038). Conclusions: Our formative qualitative study provides initial data for the design of a dementia-friendly AHP survey. Consideration of our findings may contribute to face and content validity in future quantitative preference research in dementia. MDPI 2022-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9321359/ /pubmed/35886406 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19148554 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Mohr, Wiebke Rädke, Anika Afi, Adel Mühlichen, Franka Platen, Moritz Scharf, Annelie Michalowsky, Bernhard Hoffmann, Wolfgang Development of a Quantitative Preference Instrument for Person-Centered Dementia Care—Stage 2: Insights from a Formative Qualitative Study to Design and Pretest a Dementia-Friendly Analytic Hierarchy Process Survey |
title | Development of a Quantitative Preference Instrument for Person-Centered Dementia Care—Stage 2: Insights from a Formative Qualitative Study to Design and Pretest a Dementia-Friendly Analytic Hierarchy Process Survey |
title_full | Development of a Quantitative Preference Instrument for Person-Centered Dementia Care—Stage 2: Insights from a Formative Qualitative Study to Design and Pretest a Dementia-Friendly Analytic Hierarchy Process Survey |
title_fullStr | Development of a Quantitative Preference Instrument for Person-Centered Dementia Care—Stage 2: Insights from a Formative Qualitative Study to Design and Pretest a Dementia-Friendly Analytic Hierarchy Process Survey |
title_full_unstemmed | Development of a Quantitative Preference Instrument for Person-Centered Dementia Care—Stage 2: Insights from a Formative Qualitative Study to Design and Pretest a Dementia-Friendly Analytic Hierarchy Process Survey |
title_short | Development of a Quantitative Preference Instrument for Person-Centered Dementia Care—Stage 2: Insights from a Formative Qualitative Study to Design and Pretest a Dementia-Friendly Analytic Hierarchy Process Survey |
title_sort | development of a quantitative preference instrument for person-centered dementia care—stage 2: insights from a formative qualitative study to design and pretest a dementia-friendly analytic hierarchy process survey |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9321359/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35886406 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19148554 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mohrwiebke developmentofaquantitativepreferenceinstrumentforpersoncentereddementiacarestage2insightsfromaformativequalitativestudytodesignandpretestadementiafriendlyanalytichierarchyprocesssurvey AT radkeanika developmentofaquantitativepreferenceinstrumentforpersoncentereddementiacarestage2insightsfromaformativequalitativestudytodesignandpretestadementiafriendlyanalytichierarchyprocesssurvey AT afiadel developmentofaquantitativepreferenceinstrumentforpersoncentereddementiacarestage2insightsfromaformativequalitativestudytodesignandpretestadementiafriendlyanalytichierarchyprocesssurvey AT muhlichenfranka developmentofaquantitativepreferenceinstrumentforpersoncentereddementiacarestage2insightsfromaformativequalitativestudytodesignandpretestadementiafriendlyanalytichierarchyprocesssurvey AT platenmoritz developmentofaquantitativepreferenceinstrumentforpersoncentereddementiacarestage2insightsfromaformativequalitativestudytodesignandpretestadementiafriendlyanalytichierarchyprocesssurvey AT scharfannelie developmentofaquantitativepreferenceinstrumentforpersoncentereddementiacarestage2insightsfromaformativequalitativestudytodesignandpretestadementiafriendlyanalytichierarchyprocesssurvey AT michalowskybernhard developmentofaquantitativepreferenceinstrumentforpersoncentereddementiacarestage2insightsfromaformativequalitativestudytodesignandpretestadementiafriendlyanalytichierarchyprocesssurvey AT hoffmannwolfgang developmentofaquantitativepreferenceinstrumentforpersoncentereddementiacarestage2insightsfromaformativequalitativestudytodesignandpretestadementiafriendlyanalytichierarchyprocesssurvey |