Cargando…

Prediction models used in the progression of chronic kidney disease: A scoping review

OBJECTIVE: To provide a review of prediction models that have been used to measure clinical or pathological progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD). DESIGN: Scoping review. DATA SOURCES: Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL and Scopus from the year 2011 to 17(th) February 2022. STUDY SELECTION: All English w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lim, David K. E., Boyd, James H., Thomas, Elizabeth, Chakera, Aron, Tippaya, Sawitchaya, Irish, Ashley, Manuel, Justin, Betts, Kim, Robinson, Suzanne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9321365/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35881639
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0271619
_version_ 1784756027060649984
author Lim, David K. E.
Boyd, James H.
Thomas, Elizabeth
Chakera, Aron
Tippaya, Sawitchaya
Irish, Ashley
Manuel, Justin
Betts, Kim
Robinson, Suzanne
author_facet Lim, David K. E.
Boyd, James H.
Thomas, Elizabeth
Chakera, Aron
Tippaya, Sawitchaya
Irish, Ashley
Manuel, Justin
Betts, Kim
Robinson, Suzanne
author_sort Lim, David K. E.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To provide a review of prediction models that have been used to measure clinical or pathological progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD). DESIGN: Scoping review. DATA SOURCES: Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL and Scopus from the year 2011 to 17(th) February 2022. STUDY SELECTION: All English written studies that are published in peer-reviewed journals in any country, that developed at least a statistical or computational model that predicted the risk of CKD progression. DATA EXTRACTION: Eligible studies for full text review were assessed on the methods that were used to predict the progression of CKD. The type of information extracted included: the author(s), title of article, year of publication, study dates, study location, number of participants, study design, predicted outcomes, type of prediction model, prediction variables used, validation assessment, limitations and implications. RESULTS: From 516 studies, 33 were included for full-text review. A qualitative analysis of the articles was compared following the extracted information. The study populations across the studies were heterogenous and data acquired by the studies were sourced from different levels and locations of healthcare systems. 31 studies implemented supervised models, and 2 studies included unsupervised models. Regardless of the model used, the predicted outcome included measurement of risk of progression towards end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) of related definitions, over given time intervals. However, there is a lack of reporting consistency on details of the development of their prediction models. CONCLUSIONS: Researchers are working towards producing an effective model to provide key insights into the progression of CKD. This review found that cox regression modelling was predominantly used among the small number of studies in the review. This made it difficult to perform a comparison between ML algorithms, more so when different validation methods were used in different cohort types. There needs to be increased investment in a more consistent and reproducible approach for future studies looking to develop risk prediction models for CKD progression.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9321365
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93213652022-07-27 Prediction models used in the progression of chronic kidney disease: A scoping review Lim, David K. E. Boyd, James H. Thomas, Elizabeth Chakera, Aron Tippaya, Sawitchaya Irish, Ashley Manuel, Justin Betts, Kim Robinson, Suzanne PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: To provide a review of prediction models that have been used to measure clinical or pathological progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD). DESIGN: Scoping review. DATA SOURCES: Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL and Scopus from the year 2011 to 17(th) February 2022. STUDY SELECTION: All English written studies that are published in peer-reviewed journals in any country, that developed at least a statistical or computational model that predicted the risk of CKD progression. DATA EXTRACTION: Eligible studies for full text review were assessed on the methods that were used to predict the progression of CKD. The type of information extracted included: the author(s), title of article, year of publication, study dates, study location, number of participants, study design, predicted outcomes, type of prediction model, prediction variables used, validation assessment, limitations and implications. RESULTS: From 516 studies, 33 were included for full-text review. A qualitative analysis of the articles was compared following the extracted information. The study populations across the studies were heterogenous and data acquired by the studies were sourced from different levels and locations of healthcare systems. 31 studies implemented supervised models, and 2 studies included unsupervised models. Regardless of the model used, the predicted outcome included measurement of risk of progression towards end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) of related definitions, over given time intervals. However, there is a lack of reporting consistency on details of the development of their prediction models. CONCLUSIONS: Researchers are working towards producing an effective model to provide key insights into the progression of CKD. This review found that cox regression modelling was predominantly used among the small number of studies in the review. This made it difficult to perform a comparison between ML algorithms, more so when different validation methods were used in different cohort types. There needs to be increased investment in a more consistent and reproducible approach for future studies looking to develop risk prediction models for CKD progression. Public Library of Science 2022-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9321365/ /pubmed/35881639 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0271619 Text en © 2022 Lim et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lim, David K. E.
Boyd, James H.
Thomas, Elizabeth
Chakera, Aron
Tippaya, Sawitchaya
Irish, Ashley
Manuel, Justin
Betts, Kim
Robinson, Suzanne
Prediction models used in the progression of chronic kidney disease: A scoping review
title Prediction models used in the progression of chronic kidney disease: A scoping review
title_full Prediction models used in the progression of chronic kidney disease: A scoping review
title_fullStr Prediction models used in the progression of chronic kidney disease: A scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Prediction models used in the progression of chronic kidney disease: A scoping review
title_short Prediction models used in the progression of chronic kidney disease: A scoping review
title_sort prediction models used in the progression of chronic kidney disease: a scoping review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9321365/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35881639
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0271619
work_keys_str_mv AT limdavidke predictionmodelsusedintheprogressionofchronickidneydiseaseascopingreview
AT boydjamesh predictionmodelsusedintheprogressionofchronickidneydiseaseascopingreview
AT thomaselizabeth predictionmodelsusedintheprogressionofchronickidneydiseaseascopingreview
AT chakeraaron predictionmodelsusedintheprogressionofchronickidneydiseaseascopingreview
AT tippayasawitchaya predictionmodelsusedintheprogressionofchronickidneydiseaseascopingreview
AT irishashley predictionmodelsusedintheprogressionofchronickidneydiseaseascopingreview
AT manueljustin predictionmodelsusedintheprogressionofchronickidneydiseaseascopingreview
AT bettskim predictionmodelsusedintheprogressionofchronickidneydiseaseascopingreview
AT robinsonsuzanne predictionmodelsusedintheprogressionofchronickidneydiseaseascopingreview