Cargando…

Patients′ and clinicians′ experiences of remote consultation? A narrative synthesis

AIMS: To identify, evaluate and summarize evidence of patient and clinician experiences of being involved in video or telephone consultations as a replacement for in‐person consultations. DESIGN: Narrative synthesis. DATA SOURCES: Medline; EMBASE; EMCARE; CINAHL and BNI. Searching took place from Ja...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Walthall, Helen, Schutz, Sue, Snowball, Joanne, Vagner, Raluca, Fernandez, Nicola, Bartram, Emilia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9321562/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35362191
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jan.15230
_version_ 1784756078442971136
author Walthall, Helen
Schutz, Sue
Snowball, Joanne
Vagner, Raluca
Fernandez, Nicola
Bartram, Emilia
author_facet Walthall, Helen
Schutz, Sue
Snowball, Joanne
Vagner, Raluca
Fernandez, Nicola
Bartram, Emilia
author_sort Walthall, Helen
collection PubMed
description AIMS: To identify, evaluate and summarize evidence of patient and clinician experiences of being involved in video or telephone consultations as a replacement for in‐person consultations. DESIGN: Narrative synthesis. DATA SOURCES: Medline; EMBASE; EMCARE; CINAHL and BNI. Searching took place from January 2021 to April 2021. Papers included were published between 2013 and 2020. REVIEW METHODS: Papers were appraised by two independent reviewers for methodological quality. Data extraction was conducted according to the standardized tool from Joanna Briggs Institute. RESULTS: Seven qualitative studies were included, from five countries and from the perspective of patients, relatives, administrators, nurses, physiotherapists and physicians. We developed two main themes: Pragmatic Concerns and Therapeutic Concerns. Each theme contained two categories: Pragmatic Concerns: (a) the convenience of non‐face to face consultations; (b) using technology and equipment in a consultation; Therapeutic Concerns (c) building therapeutic relationships; and (d) embracing benefits and addressing challenges. CONCLUSION: This narrative synthesis presents the existing evidence on clinician and patient experience of participating in non‐face to face consultations. Experiences are varied but largely focus on communication and forming relationships, using the technology successfully and the ability for patients to self‐manage with support from clinicians who are not in‐person. More high‐quality studies are required to explore the experiences of patients and clinicians accessing remote consultations as a result of global implementation post‐SARS‐CoV‐2 pandemic to identify any learning and education opportunities. IMPACT: Health care staff can provide high‐quality care through video or telephone appointments as well as face to face appointments. This review has, however, identified that the evidence is limited and weak in this area and recommends there is research further to inform practice and influence future care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9321562
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93215622022-07-30 Patients′ and clinicians′ experiences of remote consultation? A narrative synthesis Walthall, Helen Schutz, Sue Snowball, Joanne Vagner, Raluca Fernandez, Nicola Bartram, Emilia J Adv Nurs Reviews AIMS: To identify, evaluate and summarize evidence of patient and clinician experiences of being involved in video or telephone consultations as a replacement for in‐person consultations. DESIGN: Narrative synthesis. DATA SOURCES: Medline; EMBASE; EMCARE; CINAHL and BNI. Searching took place from January 2021 to April 2021. Papers included were published between 2013 and 2020. REVIEW METHODS: Papers were appraised by two independent reviewers for methodological quality. Data extraction was conducted according to the standardized tool from Joanna Briggs Institute. RESULTS: Seven qualitative studies were included, from five countries and from the perspective of patients, relatives, administrators, nurses, physiotherapists and physicians. We developed two main themes: Pragmatic Concerns and Therapeutic Concerns. Each theme contained two categories: Pragmatic Concerns: (a) the convenience of non‐face to face consultations; (b) using technology and equipment in a consultation; Therapeutic Concerns (c) building therapeutic relationships; and (d) embracing benefits and addressing challenges. CONCLUSION: This narrative synthesis presents the existing evidence on clinician and patient experience of participating in non‐face to face consultations. Experiences are varied but largely focus on communication and forming relationships, using the technology successfully and the ability for patients to self‐manage with support from clinicians who are not in‐person. More high‐quality studies are required to explore the experiences of patients and clinicians accessing remote consultations as a result of global implementation post‐SARS‐CoV‐2 pandemic to identify any learning and education opportunities. IMPACT: Health care staff can provide high‐quality care through video or telephone appointments as well as face to face appointments. This review has, however, identified that the evidence is limited and weak in this area and recommends there is research further to inform practice and influence future care. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-04-01 2022-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9321562/ /pubmed/35362191 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jan.15230 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Advanced Nursing published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Reviews
Walthall, Helen
Schutz, Sue
Snowball, Joanne
Vagner, Raluca
Fernandez, Nicola
Bartram, Emilia
Patients′ and clinicians′ experiences of remote consultation? A narrative synthesis
title Patients′ and clinicians′ experiences of remote consultation? A narrative synthesis
title_full Patients′ and clinicians′ experiences of remote consultation? A narrative synthesis
title_fullStr Patients′ and clinicians′ experiences of remote consultation? A narrative synthesis
title_full_unstemmed Patients′ and clinicians′ experiences of remote consultation? A narrative synthesis
title_short Patients′ and clinicians′ experiences of remote consultation? A narrative synthesis
title_sort patients′ and clinicians′ experiences of remote consultation? a narrative synthesis
topic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9321562/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35362191
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jan.15230
work_keys_str_mv AT walthallhelen patientsandcliniciansexperiencesofremoteconsultationanarrativesynthesis
AT schutzsue patientsandcliniciansexperiencesofremoteconsultationanarrativesynthesis
AT snowballjoanne patientsandcliniciansexperiencesofremoteconsultationanarrativesynthesis
AT vagnerraluca patientsandcliniciansexperiencesofremoteconsultationanarrativesynthesis
AT fernandeznicola patientsandcliniciansexperiencesofremoteconsultationanarrativesynthesis
AT bartramemilia patientsandcliniciansexperiencesofremoteconsultationanarrativesynthesis