Cargando…

Chemotherapy after PD‐1 inhibitors in relapsed/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma: Outcomes and clonal evolution dynamics

Checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) are routinely employed in relapsed/refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma. Nonetheless, persistent long‐term responses are uncommon, and one‐third of patients are refractory. Several reports have suggested that treatment with CPIs may re‐sensitize patients to chemotherapy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Calabretta, Eleonora, Guidetti, Anna, Ricci, Francesca, Di Trani, Martina, Monfrini, Chiara, Magagnoli, Massimo, Bramanti, Stefania, Maspero, Davide, Morello, Lucia, Merli, Michele, Di Rocco, Alice, Graudenzi, Alex, Derenzini, Enrico, Antoniotti, Marco, Rossi, Davide, Corradini, Paolo, Santoro, Armando, Carlo‐Stella, Carmelo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9321573/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35468225
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjh.18183
_version_ 1784756081090625536
author Calabretta, Eleonora
Guidetti, Anna
Ricci, Francesca
Di Trani, Martina
Monfrini, Chiara
Magagnoli, Massimo
Bramanti, Stefania
Maspero, Davide
Morello, Lucia
Merli, Michele
Di Rocco, Alice
Graudenzi, Alex
Derenzini, Enrico
Antoniotti, Marco
Rossi, Davide
Corradini, Paolo
Santoro, Armando
Carlo‐Stella, Carmelo
author_facet Calabretta, Eleonora
Guidetti, Anna
Ricci, Francesca
Di Trani, Martina
Monfrini, Chiara
Magagnoli, Massimo
Bramanti, Stefania
Maspero, Davide
Morello, Lucia
Merli, Michele
Di Rocco, Alice
Graudenzi, Alex
Derenzini, Enrico
Antoniotti, Marco
Rossi, Davide
Corradini, Paolo
Santoro, Armando
Carlo‐Stella, Carmelo
author_sort Calabretta, Eleonora
collection PubMed
description Checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) are routinely employed in relapsed/refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma. Nonetheless, persistent long‐term responses are uncommon, and one‐third of patients are refractory. Several reports have suggested that treatment with CPIs may re‐sensitize patients to chemotherapy, however there is no consensus on the optimal chemotherapy regimen and subsequent consolidation strategy. In this retrospective study we analysed the response to rechallenge with chemotherapy after CPI failure. Furthermore, we exploratively characterized the clonal evolution profile of a small sample of patients (n = 5) by employing the CALDER approach. Among the 28 patients included in the study, 17 (71%) were primary refractory and 26 (92%) were refractory to the last chemotherapy prior to CPIs. Following rechallenge with chemotherapy, response was recorded in 23 (82%) patients experiencing complete remission and 3 (11%) patients experiencing partial remission. The tumour evolution of the patients inferred by CALDER seemingly occurred prior to the first cycle of therapy and was characterized either by linear or branching evolution patterns. Twenty‐five patients proceeded to allogeneic stem cell transplantation. At a median follow‐up of 21 months, median PFS and OS were not reached. In conclusion, patients who fail CPIs can be effectively rescued by salvage chemotherapy and bridged to allo‐SCT/auto‐SCT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9321573
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93215732022-07-30 Chemotherapy after PD‐1 inhibitors in relapsed/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma: Outcomes and clonal evolution dynamics Calabretta, Eleonora Guidetti, Anna Ricci, Francesca Di Trani, Martina Monfrini, Chiara Magagnoli, Massimo Bramanti, Stefania Maspero, Davide Morello, Lucia Merli, Michele Di Rocco, Alice Graudenzi, Alex Derenzini, Enrico Antoniotti, Marco Rossi, Davide Corradini, Paolo Santoro, Armando Carlo‐Stella, Carmelo Br J Haematol Haematological Malignancy‐clinical Checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) are routinely employed in relapsed/refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma. Nonetheless, persistent long‐term responses are uncommon, and one‐third of patients are refractory. Several reports have suggested that treatment with CPIs may re‐sensitize patients to chemotherapy, however there is no consensus on the optimal chemotherapy regimen and subsequent consolidation strategy. In this retrospective study we analysed the response to rechallenge with chemotherapy after CPI failure. Furthermore, we exploratively characterized the clonal evolution profile of a small sample of patients (n = 5) by employing the CALDER approach. Among the 28 patients included in the study, 17 (71%) were primary refractory and 26 (92%) were refractory to the last chemotherapy prior to CPIs. Following rechallenge with chemotherapy, response was recorded in 23 (82%) patients experiencing complete remission and 3 (11%) patients experiencing partial remission. The tumour evolution of the patients inferred by CALDER seemingly occurred prior to the first cycle of therapy and was characterized either by linear or branching evolution patterns. Twenty‐five patients proceeded to allogeneic stem cell transplantation. At a median follow‐up of 21 months, median PFS and OS were not reached. In conclusion, patients who fail CPIs can be effectively rescued by salvage chemotherapy and bridged to allo‐SCT/auto‐SCT. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-04-25 2022-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9321573/ /pubmed/35468225 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjh.18183 Text en © 2022 The Authors. British Journal of Haematology published by British Society for Haematology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Haematological Malignancy‐clinical
Calabretta, Eleonora
Guidetti, Anna
Ricci, Francesca
Di Trani, Martina
Monfrini, Chiara
Magagnoli, Massimo
Bramanti, Stefania
Maspero, Davide
Morello, Lucia
Merli, Michele
Di Rocco, Alice
Graudenzi, Alex
Derenzini, Enrico
Antoniotti, Marco
Rossi, Davide
Corradini, Paolo
Santoro, Armando
Carlo‐Stella, Carmelo
Chemotherapy after PD‐1 inhibitors in relapsed/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma: Outcomes and clonal evolution dynamics
title Chemotherapy after PD‐1 inhibitors in relapsed/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma: Outcomes and clonal evolution dynamics
title_full Chemotherapy after PD‐1 inhibitors in relapsed/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma: Outcomes and clonal evolution dynamics
title_fullStr Chemotherapy after PD‐1 inhibitors in relapsed/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma: Outcomes and clonal evolution dynamics
title_full_unstemmed Chemotherapy after PD‐1 inhibitors in relapsed/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma: Outcomes and clonal evolution dynamics
title_short Chemotherapy after PD‐1 inhibitors in relapsed/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma: Outcomes and clonal evolution dynamics
title_sort chemotherapy after pd‐1 inhibitors in relapsed/refractory hodgkin lymphoma: outcomes and clonal evolution dynamics
topic Haematological Malignancy‐clinical
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9321573/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35468225
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjh.18183
work_keys_str_mv AT calabrettaeleonora chemotherapyafterpd1inhibitorsinrelapsedrefractoryhodgkinlymphomaoutcomesandclonalevolutiondynamics
AT guidettianna chemotherapyafterpd1inhibitorsinrelapsedrefractoryhodgkinlymphomaoutcomesandclonalevolutiondynamics
AT riccifrancesca chemotherapyafterpd1inhibitorsinrelapsedrefractoryhodgkinlymphomaoutcomesandclonalevolutiondynamics
AT ditranimartina chemotherapyafterpd1inhibitorsinrelapsedrefractoryhodgkinlymphomaoutcomesandclonalevolutiondynamics
AT monfrinichiara chemotherapyafterpd1inhibitorsinrelapsedrefractoryhodgkinlymphomaoutcomesandclonalevolutiondynamics
AT magagnolimassimo chemotherapyafterpd1inhibitorsinrelapsedrefractoryhodgkinlymphomaoutcomesandclonalevolutiondynamics
AT bramantistefania chemotherapyafterpd1inhibitorsinrelapsedrefractoryhodgkinlymphomaoutcomesandclonalevolutiondynamics
AT masperodavide chemotherapyafterpd1inhibitorsinrelapsedrefractoryhodgkinlymphomaoutcomesandclonalevolutiondynamics
AT morellolucia chemotherapyafterpd1inhibitorsinrelapsedrefractoryhodgkinlymphomaoutcomesandclonalevolutiondynamics
AT merlimichele chemotherapyafterpd1inhibitorsinrelapsedrefractoryhodgkinlymphomaoutcomesandclonalevolutiondynamics
AT diroccoalice chemotherapyafterpd1inhibitorsinrelapsedrefractoryhodgkinlymphomaoutcomesandclonalevolutiondynamics
AT graudenzialex chemotherapyafterpd1inhibitorsinrelapsedrefractoryhodgkinlymphomaoutcomesandclonalevolutiondynamics
AT derenzinienrico chemotherapyafterpd1inhibitorsinrelapsedrefractoryhodgkinlymphomaoutcomesandclonalevolutiondynamics
AT antoniottimarco chemotherapyafterpd1inhibitorsinrelapsedrefractoryhodgkinlymphomaoutcomesandclonalevolutiondynamics
AT rossidavide chemotherapyafterpd1inhibitorsinrelapsedrefractoryhodgkinlymphomaoutcomesandclonalevolutiondynamics
AT corradinipaolo chemotherapyafterpd1inhibitorsinrelapsedrefractoryhodgkinlymphomaoutcomesandclonalevolutiondynamics
AT santoroarmando chemotherapyafterpd1inhibitorsinrelapsedrefractoryhodgkinlymphomaoutcomesandclonalevolutiondynamics
AT carlostellacarmelo chemotherapyafterpd1inhibitorsinrelapsedrefractoryhodgkinlymphomaoutcomesandclonalevolutiondynamics