Cargando…

Can Bodybuilding Peak Week Manipulations Favorably Affect Muscle Size, Subcutaneous Thickness, and Related Body Composition Variables? A Case Study

Background: The purpose of this case study was to implement an evidence-based dietary approach to peaking for a bodybuilding competition and monitor its impact on body composition, muscle thickness (MT), intra-to-extra-cellular fluid shifts, subcutaneous thickness (ST), and hydration status. Seconda...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barakat, Christopher, Escalante, Guillermo, Stevenson, Scott W., Bradshaw, Joshua T., Barsuhn, Andrew, Tinsley, Grant M., Walters, Joseph
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9321665/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35878117
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sports10070106
_version_ 1784756103887716352
author Barakat, Christopher
Escalante, Guillermo
Stevenson, Scott W.
Bradshaw, Joshua T.
Barsuhn, Andrew
Tinsley, Grant M.
Walters, Joseph
author_facet Barakat, Christopher
Escalante, Guillermo
Stevenson, Scott W.
Bradshaw, Joshua T.
Barsuhn, Andrew
Tinsley, Grant M.
Walters, Joseph
author_sort Barakat, Christopher
collection PubMed
description Background: The purpose of this case study was to implement an evidence-based dietary approach to peaking for a bodybuilding competition and monitor its impact on body composition, muscle thickness (MT), intra-to-extra-cellular fluid shifts, subcutaneous thickness (ST), and hydration status. Secondarily, to document any adverse events of this peak week approach in a small, controlled setting. Methods Dietary practices were recorded, and laboratory testing was conducted throughout peak week, including competition morning. Assessments included: dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) for body composition, B-mode ultrasound for MT and ST, bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) for total body water (TBW)/intracellular water (ICW)/extracellular water (ECW), and raw BIS data (i.e., resistance, reactance, and phase angle), urine specific gravity (USG) for hydration status, and subjective fullness. Sequential dietary manipulations were made (i.e., CHO depletion/fat loading, CHO/water loading, and a refinement phase) with specific physiological goals. This was reflected in changes observed across all assessments throughout the peak week. Results: From the carbohydrate-depleted state (three days out) to competition day, we observed increases in lean body mass, MT, TBW (primarily ICW), and subjective fullness. Kendall’s Tau B revealed a strong relationship between carbohydrate intake and ∑MT (τ = 0.733, p = 0.056). Additionally, novel ST data demonstrated a 10% reduction for the summation of all seven sites, with some drastic changes in specific regions (e.g., −43% for triceps ST) from three days out to competition day. Conclusions: These data suggest that the prototypical goals of bodybuilders’ peak week (i.e., increasing muscle fullness, decreasing subcutaneous thickness) to enhance their aesthetics/muscularity presented can be achieved with a drug-free protocol involving dietary manipulations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9321665
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93216652022-07-27 Can Bodybuilding Peak Week Manipulations Favorably Affect Muscle Size, Subcutaneous Thickness, and Related Body Composition Variables? A Case Study Barakat, Christopher Escalante, Guillermo Stevenson, Scott W. Bradshaw, Joshua T. Barsuhn, Andrew Tinsley, Grant M. Walters, Joseph Sports (Basel) Case Report Background: The purpose of this case study was to implement an evidence-based dietary approach to peaking for a bodybuilding competition and monitor its impact on body composition, muscle thickness (MT), intra-to-extra-cellular fluid shifts, subcutaneous thickness (ST), and hydration status. Secondarily, to document any adverse events of this peak week approach in a small, controlled setting. Methods Dietary practices were recorded, and laboratory testing was conducted throughout peak week, including competition morning. Assessments included: dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) for body composition, B-mode ultrasound for MT and ST, bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) for total body water (TBW)/intracellular water (ICW)/extracellular water (ECW), and raw BIS data (i.e., resistance, reactance, and phase angle), urine specific gravity (USG) for hydration status, and subjective fullness. Sequential dietary manipulations were made (i.e., CHO depletion/fat loading, CHO/water loading, and a refinement phase) with specific physiological goals. This was reflected in changes observed across all assessments throughout the peak week. Results: From the carbohydrate-depleted state (three days out) to competition day, we observed increases in lean body mass, MT, TBW (primarily ICW), and subjective fullness. Kendall’s Tau B revealed a strong relationship between carbohydrate intake and ∑MT (τ = 0.733, p = 0.056). Additionally, novel ST data demonstrated a 10% reduction for the summation of all seven sites, with some drastic changes in specific regions (e.g., −43% for triceps ST) from three days out to competition day. Conclusions: These data suggest that the prototypical goals of bodybuilders’ peak week (i.e., increasing muscle fullness, decreasing subcutaneous thickness) to enhance their aesthetics/muscularity presented can be achieved with a drug-free protocol involving dietary manipulations. MDPI 2022-07-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9321665/ /pubmed/35878117 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sports10070106 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Case Report
Barakat, Christopher
Escalante, Guillermo
Stevenson, Scott W.
Bradshaw, Joshua T.
Barsuhn, Andrew
Tinsley, Grant M.
Walters, Joseph
Can Bodybuilding Peak Week Manipulations Favorably Affect Muscle Size, Subcutaneous Thickness, and Related Body Composition Variables? A Case Study
title Can Bodybuilding Peak Week Manipulations Favorably Affect Muscle Size, Subcutaneous Thickness, and Related Body Composition Variables? A Case Study
title_full Can Bodybuilding Peak Week Manipulations Favorably Affect Muscle Size, Subcutaneous Thickness, and Related Body Composition Variables? A Case Study
title_fullStr Can Bodybuilding Peak Week Manipulations Favorably Affect Muscle Size, Subcutaneous Thickness, and Related Body Composition Variables? A Case Study
title_full_unstemmed Can Bodybuilding Peak Week Manipulations Favorably Affect Muscle Size, Subcutaneous Thickness, and Related Body Composition Variables? A Case Study
title_short Can Bodybuilding Peak Week Manipulations Favorably Affect Muscle Size, Subcutaneous Thickness, and Related Body Composition Variables? A Case Study
title_sort can bodybuilding peak week manipulations favorably affect muscle size, subcutaneous thickness, and related body composition variables? a case study
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9321665/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35878117
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sports10070106
work_keys_str_mv AT barakatchristopher canbodybuildingpeakweekmanipulationsfavorablyaffectmusclesizesubcutaneousthicknessandrelatedbodycompositionvariablesacasestudy
AT escalanteguillermo canbodybuildingpeakweekmanipulationsfavorablyaffectmusclesizesubcutaneousthicknessandrelatedbodycompositionvariablesacasestudy
AT stevensonscottw canbodybuildingpeakweekmanipulationsfavorablyaffectmusclesizesubcutaneousthicknessandrelatedbodycompositionvariablesacasestudy
AT bradshawjoshuat canbodybuildingpeakweekmanipulationsfavorablyaffectmusclesizesubcutaneousthicknessandrelatedbodycompositionvariablesacasestudy
AT barsuhnandrew canbodybuildingpeakweekmanipulationsfavorablyaffectmusclesizesubcutaneousthicknessandrelatedbodycompositionvariablesacasestudy
AT tinsleygrantm canbodybuildingpeakweekmanipulationsfavorablyaffectmusclesizesubcutaneousthicknessandrelatedbodycompositionvariablesacasestudy
AT waltersjoseph canbodybuildingpeakweekmanipulationsfavorablyaffectmusclesizesubcutaneousthicknessandrelatedbodycompositionvariablesacasestudy