Cargando…
Are we underutilising computer tomography colonography in Australia?
Computed tomography colonography (CTC) is a safe and accurate tool for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. CTC requires dedicated radiological expertise and demonstrates a high sensitivity and specificity in polyp detection, which is similar to optical co...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9321686/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35451543 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/imj.15778 |
_version_ | 1784756109162053632 |
---|---|
author | Lee, Shawn Z. Schubert, Jonathon P. Prowse, Simon J. B. Bryant, Robert V. |
author_facet | Lee, Shawn Z. Schubert, Jonathon P. Prowse, Simon J. B. Bryant, Robert V. |
author_sort | Lee, Shawn Z. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Computed tomography colonography (CTC) is a safe and accurate tool for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. CTC requires dedicated radiological expertise and demonstrates a high sensitivity and specificity in polyp detection, which is similar to optical colonoscopy (OC). Newer preparation techniques for CTC, such as faecal tagging without catharsis might further improve both the tolerability and accuracy of the test. While exposure to ionising radiation, lack of capacity for therapeutic intervention and potentially diminished sensitivity for flat serrated polyps are limitations of CTC, the technique has a role in select populations. CTC should be considered in frail or elderly patients at high anaesthetic risk for OC, patients with stricturing colonic lesions as well as incomplete colonoscopy, or in patients at risk of delayed access to timely OC. With an ever‐growing demand for endoscopic services, increased utilisation of CTC could reduce waiting times for colonoscopy, thereby broadening access to timely and effective CRC screening. Further research is required to improve further the detection of flat lesions, including sessile serrated polyps. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9321686 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93216862022-07-30 Are we underutilising computer tomography colonography in Australia? Lee, Shawn Z. Schubert, Jonathon P. Prowse, Simon J. B. Bryant, Robert V. Intern Med J Brief Communications Computed tomography colonography (CTC) is a safe and accurate tool for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. CTC requires dedicated radiological expertise and demonstrates a high sensitivity and specificity in polyp detection, which is similar to optical colonoscopy (OC). Newer preparation techniques for CTC, such as faecal tagging without catharsis might further improve both the tolerability and accuracy of the test. While exposure to ionising radiation, lack of capacity for therapeutic intervention and potentially diminished sensitivity for flat serrated polyps are limitations of CTC, the technique has a role in select populations. CTC should be considered in frail or elderly patients at high anaesthetic risk for OC, patients with stricturing colonic lesions as well as incomplete colonoscopy, or in patients at risk of delayed access to timely OC. With an ever‐growing demand for endoscopic services, increased utilisation of CTC could reduce waiting times for colonoscopy, thereby broadening access to timely and effective CRC screening. Further research is required to improve further the detection of flat lesions, including sessile serrated polyps. John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2022-04-22 2022-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9321686/ /pubmed/35451543 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/imj.15778 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Internal Medicine Journal published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Royal Australasian College of Physicians. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Brief Communications Lee, Shawn Z. Schubert, Jonathon P. Prowse, Simon J. B. Bryant, Robert V. Are we underutilising computer tomography colonography in Australia? |
title | Are we underutilising computer tomography colonography in Australia? |
title_full | Are we underutilising computer tomography colonography in Australia? |
title_fullStr | Are we underutilising computer tomography colonography in Australia? |
title_full_unstemmed | Are we underutilising computer tomography colonography in Australia? |
title_short | Are we underutilising computer tomography colonography in Australia? |
title_sort | are we underutilising computer tomography colonography in australia? |
topic | Brief Communications |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9321686/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35451543 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/imj.15778 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leeshawnz areweunderutilisingcomputertomographycolonographyinaustralia AT schubertjonathonp areweunderutilisingcomputertomographycolonographyinaustralia AT prowsesimonjb areweunderutilisingcomputertomographycolonographyinaustralia AT bryantrobertv areweunderutilisingcomputertomographycolonographyinaustralia |