Cargando…

Are we underutilising computer tomography colonography in Australia?

Computed tomography colonography (CTC) is a safe and accurate tool for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. CTC requires dedicated radiological expertise and demonstrates a high sensitivity and specificity in polyp detection, which is similar to optical co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Shawn Z., Schubert, Jonathon P., Prowse, Simon J. B., Bryant, Robert V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9321686/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35451543
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/imj.15778
_version_ 1784756109162053632
author Lee, Shawn Z.
Schubert, Jonathon P.
Prowse, Simon J. B.
Bryant, Robert V.
author_facet Lee, Shawn Z.
Schubert, Jonathon P.
Prowse, Simon J. B.
Bryant, Robert V.
author_sort Lee, Shawn Z.
collection PubMed
description Computed tomography colonography (CTC) is a safe and accurate tool for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. CTC requires dedicated radiological expertise and demonstrates a high sensitivity and specificity in polyp detection, which is similar to optical colonoscopy (OC). Newer preparation techniques for CTC, such as faecal tagging without catharsis might further improve both the tolerability and accuracy of the test. While exposure to ionising radiation, lack of capacity for therapeutic intervention and potentially diminished sensitivity for flat serrated polyps are limitations of CTC, the technique has a role in select populations. CTC should be considered in frail or elderly patients at high anaesthetic risk for OC, patients with stricturing colonic lesions as well as incomplete colonoscopy, or in patients at risk of delayed access to timely OC. With an ever‐growing demand for endoscopic services, increased utilisation of CTC could reduce waiting times for colonoscopy, thereby broadening access to timely and effective CRC screening. Further research is required to improve further the detection of flat lesions, including sessile serrated polyps.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9321686
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93216862022-07-30 Are we underutilising computer tomography colonography in Australia? Lee, Shawn Z. Schubert, Jonathon P. Prowse, Simon J. B. Bryant, Robert V. Intern Med J Brief Communications Computed tomography colonography (CTC) is a safe and accurate tool for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. CTC requires dedicated radiological expertise and demonstrates a high sensitivity and specificity in polyp detection, which is similar to optical colonoscopy (OC). Newer preparation techniques for CTC, such as faecal tagging without catharsis might further improve both the tolerability and accuracy of the test. While exposure to ionising radiation, lack of capacity for therapeutic intervention and potentially diminished sensitivity for flat serrated polyps are limitations of CTC, the technique has a role in select populations. CTC should be considered in frail or elderly patients at high anaesthetic risk for OC, patients with stricturing colonic lesions as well as incomplete colonoscopy, or in patients at risk of delayed access to timely OC. With an ever‐growing demand for endoscopic services, increased utilisation of CTC could reduce waiting times for colonoscopy, thereby broadening access to timely and effective CRC screening. Further research is required to improve further the detection of flat lesions, including sessile serrated polyps. John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2022-04-22 2022-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9321686/ /pubmed/35451543 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/imj.15778 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Internal Medicine Journal published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Royal Australasian College of Physicians. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Brief Communications
Lee, Shawn Z.
Schubert, Jonathon P.
Prowse, Simon J. B.
Bryant, Robert V.
Are we underutilising computer tomography colonography in Australia?
title Are we underutilising computer tomography colonography in Australia?
title_full Are we underutilising computer tomography colonography in Australia?
title_fullStr Are we underutilising computer tomography colonography in Australia?
title_full_unstemmed Are we underutilising computer tomography colonography in Australia?
title_short Are we underutilising computer tomography colonography in Australia?
title_sort are we underutilising computer tomography colonography in australia?
topic Brief Communications
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9321686/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35451543
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/imj.15778
work_keys_str_mv AT leeshawnz areweunderutilisingcomputertomographycolonographyinaustralia
AT schubertjonathonp areweunderutilisingcomputertomographycolonographyinaustralia
AT prowsesimonjb areweunderutilisingcomputertomographycolonographyinaustralia
AT bryantrobertv areweunderutilisingcomputertomographycolonographyinaustralia