Cargando…
A roadmap to clinical trials for FLASH
While FLASH radiation therapy is inspiring enthusiasm to transform the field, it is neither new nor well understood with respect to the radiobiological mechanisms. As FLASH clinical trials are designed, it will be important to ensure we can deliver dose consistently and safely to every patient. Much...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9321729/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35366339 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mp.15623 |
_version_ | 1784756119315415040 |
---|---|
author | Taylor, Paige A. Moran, Jean M. Jaffray, David A. Buchsbaum, Jeffrey C. |
author_facet | Taylor, Paige A. Moran, Jean M. Jaffray, David A. Buchsbaum, Jeffrey C. |
author_sort | Taylor, Paige A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | While FLASH radiation therapy is inspiring enthusiasm to transform the field, it is neither new nor well understood with respect to the radiobiological mechanisms. As FLASH clinical trials are designed, it will be important to ensure we can deliver dose consistently and safely to every patient. Much like hyperthermia and proton therapy, FLASH is a promising new technology that will be complex to implement in the clinic and similarly will require customized credentialing for multi‐institutional clinical trials. There is no doubt that FLASH seems promising, but many technologies that we take for granted in conventional radiation oncology, such as rigorous dosimetry, 3D treatment planning, volumetric image guidance, or motion management, may play a major role in defining how to use, or whether to use, FLASH radiotherapy. Given the extended time frame for patients to experience late effects, we recommend moving deliberately but cautiously forward toward clinical trials. In this paper, we review the state of quality assurance and safety systems in FLASH, identify critical pre‐clinical data points that need to be defined, and suggest how lessons learned from previous technological advancements will help us close the gaps and build a successful path to evidence‐driven FLASH implementation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9321729 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93217292022-07-30 A roadmap to clinical trials for FLASH Taylor, Paige A. Moran, Jean M. Jaffray, David A. Buchsbaum, Jeffrey C. Med Phys FLASH: CURRENT STATUS AND THE TRANSITION TO CLINICAL USE While FLASH radiation therapy is inspiring enthusiasm to transform the field, it is neither new nor well understood with respect to the radiobiological mechanisms. As FLASH clinical trials are designed, it will be important to ensure we can deliver dose consistently and safely to every patient. Much like hyperthermia and proton therapy, FLASH is a promising new technology that will be complex to implement in the clinic and similarly will require customized credentialing for multi‐institutional clinical trials. There is no doubt that FLASH seems promising, but many technologies that we take for granted in conventional radiation oncology, such as rigorous dosimetry, 3D treatment planning, volumetric image guidance, or motion management, may play a major role in defining how to use, or whether to use, FLASH radiotherapy. Given the extended time frame for patients to experience late effects, we recommend moving deliberately but cautiously forward toward clinical trials. In this paper, we review the state of quality assurance and safety systems in FLASH, identify critical pre‐clinical data points that need to be defined, and suggest how lessons learned from previous technological advancements will help us close the gaps and build a successful path to evidence‐driven FLASH implementation. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-04-25 2022-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9321729/ /pubmed/35366339 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mp.15623 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | FLASH: CURRENT STATUS AND THE TRANSITION TO CLINICAL USE Taylor, Paige A. Moran, Jean M. Jaffray, David A. Buchsbaum, Jeffrey C. A roadmap to clinical trials for FLASH |
title | A roadmap to clinical trials for FLASH |
title_full | A roadmap to clinical trials for FLASH |
title_fullStr | A roadmap to clinical trials for FLASH |
title_full_unstemmed | A roadmap to clinical trials for FLASH |
title_short | A roadmap to clinical trials for FLASH |
title_sort | roadmap to clinical trials for flash |
topic | FLASH: CURRENT STATUS AND THE TRANSITION TO CLINICAL USE |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9321729/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35366339 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mp.15623 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT taylorpaigea aroadmaptoclinicaltrialsforflash AT moranjeanm aroadmaptoclinicaltrialsforflash AT jaffraydavida aroadmaptoclinicaltrialsforflash AT buchsbaumjeffreyc aroadmaptoclinicaltrialsforflash AT taylorpaigea roadmaptoclinicaltrialsforflash AT moranjeanm roadmaptoclinicaltrialsforflash AT jaffraydavida roadmaptoclinicaltrialsforflash AT buchsbaumjeffreyc roadmaptoclinicaltrialsforflash |