Cargando…

Calculation of Aortic VAlve and LVOT Areas by a Modified Continuity Equation Using Different Echocardiography Methods: The CAVALIER Study

Background: The area of the left ventricular outflow tract (A(LVOT)) represents a major component of the continuity equation (CE), which is, i.a., crucial to calculate the aortic valve (AV) area (A(AV)). The A(LVOT) is typically calculated using 2D echo assessments as the measured anterior–posterior...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ruf, Tobias Friedrich, Cannard, Béatrice Elise, Strasser, Ruth H., Linke, Axel, Sveric, Krunoslav M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9321790/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35885559
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12071656
_version_ 1784756134670761984
author Ruf, Tobias Friedrich
Cannard, Béatrice Elise
Strasser, Ruth H.
Linke, Axel
Sveric, Krunoslav M.
author_facet Ruf, Tobias Friedrich
Cannard, Béatrice Elise
Strasser, Ruth H.
Linke, Axel
Sveric, Krunoslav M.
author_sort Ruf, Tobias Friedrich
collection PubMed
description Background: The area of the left ventricular outflow tract (A(LVOT)) represents a major component of the continuity equation (CE), which is, i.a., crucial to calculate the aortic valve (AV) area (A(AV)). The A(LVOT) is typically calculated using 2D echo assessments as the measured anterior–posterior (a/p) extension, assuming a round LVOT base. Anatomically, however, usually an elliptical shape of the LVOT base is present, with the long diameter extending from the medial–lateral axis (m/l), which is not recognized by two-dimensional (2D) echocardiography. Objective: We aimed to compare standard and three-dimensional (3D)-echocardiography-derived A(LVOT) calculation and its use in a standard CE (CE(std)) and a modified CE (CE(mod)) to calculate the A(AV) vs. computed tomography (CT) multi-planar reconstruction (MPR) measurements of the anatomical A(LVOT,) and A(AV), respectively. Methods: Patients were selected if 3D transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), 3D transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), and cardiac CT were all performed, and imaging quality was adequate. The A(LVOT) was assessed using 2D calculation, (a/p only), 3D-volume MPR, and 3D-biplane calculation (a/p and m/l). A(AV) was measured using both CE(std) and CE(mod), and 3D-volume MPR. Data were compared to corresponding CT analyses. Results: From 2017 to 2018, 107 consecutive patients with complete and adequate imaging data were included. The calculated A(LVOT) was smaller when assessed by 2D- compared to both 3D-volume MPR and 3D-biplane calculation. Calculated A(AV) was correspondingly smaller in CE(std) compared to CE(mod) or 3D-volume MPR. The A(LVOT) and A(AV), using data from 3D echocardiography, highly correlated and were congruent with corresponding measurements in CT. Conclusion: Due to the elliptic shape of the LVOT, use of measurements and calculations based on 2D echocardiography systematically underestimates the A(LVOT) and dependent areas, such as the A(AV). Anatomically correct assessment can be achieved using 3D echocardiography and adapted calculations, such as CE(mod).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9321790
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93217902022-07-27 Calculation of Aortic VAlve and LVOT Areas by a Modified Continuity Equation Using Different Echocardiography Methods: The CAVALIER Study Ruf, Tobias Friedrich Cannard, Béatrice Elise Strasser, Ruth H. Linke, Axel Sveric, Krunoslav M. Diagnostics (Basel) Article Background: The area of the left ventricular outflow tract (A(LVOT)) represents a major component of the continuity equation (CE), which is, i.a., crucial to calculate the aortic valve (AV) area (A(AV)). The A(LVOT) is typically calculated using 2D echo assessments as the measured anterior–posterior (a/p) extension, assuming a round LVOT base. Anatomically, however, usually an elliptical shape of the LVOT base is present, with the long diameter extending from the medial–lateral axis (m/l), which is not recognized by two-dimensional (2D) echocardiography. Objective: We aimed to compare standard and three-dimensional (3D)-echocardiography-derived A(LVOT) calculation and its use in a standard CE (CE(std)) and a modified CE (CE(mod)) to calculate the A(AV) vs. computed tomography (CT) multi-planar reconstruction (MPR) measurements of the anatomical A(LVOT,) and A(AV), respectively. Methods: Patients were selected if 3D transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), 3D transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), and cardiac CT were all performed, and imaging quality was adequate. The A(LVOT) was assessed using 2D calculation, (a/p only), 3D-volume MPR, and 3D-biplane calculation (a/p and m/l). A(AV) was measured using both CE(std) and CE(mod), and 3D-volume MPR. Data were compared to corresponding CT analyses. Results: From 2017 to 2018, 107 consecutive patients with complete and adequate imaging data were included. The calculated A(LVOT) was smaller when assessed by 2D- compared to both 3D-volume MPR and 3D-biplane calculation. Calculated A(AV) was correspondingly smaller in CE(std) compared to CE(mod) or 3D-volume MPR. The A(LVOT) and A(AV), using data from 3D echocardiography, highly correlated and were congruent with corresponding measurements in CT. Conclusion: Due to the elliptic shape of the LVOT, use of measurements and calculations based on 2D echocardiography systematically underestimates the A(LVOT) and dependent areas, such as the A(AV). Anatomically correct assessment can be achieved using 3D echocardiography and adapted calculations, such as CE(mod). MDPI 2022-07-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9321790/ /pubmed/35885559 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12071656 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Ruf, Tobias Friedrich
Cannard, Béatrice Elise
Strasser, Ruth H.
Linke, Axel
Sveric, Krunoslav M.
Calculation of Aortic VAlve and LVOT Areas by a Modified Continuity Equation Using Different Echocardiography Methods: The CAVALIER Study
title Calculation of Aortic VAlve and LVOT Areas by a Modified Continuity Equation Using Different Echocardiography Methods: The CAVALIER Study
title_full Calculation of Aortic VAlve and LVOT Areas by a Modified Continuity Equation Using Different Echocardiography Methods: The CAVALIER Study
title_fullStr Calculation of Aortic VAlve and LVOT Areas by a Modified Continuity Equation Using Different Echocardiography Methods: The CAVALIER Study
title_full_unstemmed Calculation of Aortic VAlve and LVOT Areas by a Modified Continuity Equation Using Different Echocardiography Methods: The CAVALIER Study
title_short Calculation of Aortic VAlve and LVOT Areas by a Modified Continuity Equation Using Different Echocardiography Methods: The CAVALIER Study
title_sort calculation of aortic valve and lvot areas by a modified continuity equation using different echocardiography methods: the cavalier study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9321790/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35885559
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12071656
work_keys_str_mv AT ruftobiasfriedrich calculationofaorticvalveandlvotareasbyamodifiedcontinuityequationusingdifferentechocardiographymethodsthecavalierstudy
AT cannardbeatriceelise calculationofaorticvalveandlvotareasbyamodifiedcontinuityequationusingdifferentechocardiographymethodsthecavalierstudy
AT strasserruthh calculationofaorticvalveandlvotareasbyamodifiedcontinuityequationusingdifferentechocardiographymethodsthecavalierstudy
AT linkeaxel calculationofaorticvalveandlvotareasbyamodifiedcontinuityequationusingdifferentechocardiographymethodsthecavalierstudy
AT sverickrunoslavm calculationofaorticvalveandlvotareasbyamodifiedcontinuityequationusingdifferentechocardiographymethodsthecavalierstudy