Cargando…

Assessing deterioration using impairment and functional outcome measures in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy: A post‐hoc analysis of the immunoglobulin overtreatment in CIDP trial

It is unclear whether frequently used cutoff values for outcome measures defining minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) can accurately identify meaningful deterioration in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP). We used data from the immunoglobulin overtreatment in CIDP...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Veen, Robin, Wieske, Luuk, Lucke, Ilse, Adrichem, Max E., Merkies, Ingemar S. J., van Schaik, Ivo N., Eftimov, Filip
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wiley Periodicals, Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9321849/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35507446
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jns.12497
_version_ 1784756149337194496
author van Veen, Robin
Wieske, Luuk
Lucke, Ilse
Adrichem, Max E.
Merkies, Ingemar S. J.
van Schaik, Ivo N.
Eftimov, Filip
author_facet van Veen, Robin
Wieske, Luuk
Lucke, Ilse
Adrichem, Max E.
Merkies, Ingemar S. J.
van Schaik, Ivo N.
Eftimov, Filip
author_sort van Veen, Robin
collection PubMed
description It is unclear whether frequently used cutoff values for outcome measures defining minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) can accurately identify meaningful deterioration in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP). We used data from the immunoglobulin overtreatment in CIDP (IOC) trial, in which 60 clinically stable patients with CIDP were randomized to intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) withdrawal or continuation. We calculated change scores of the Inflammatory Rasch‐Built Overall Disability Scale (I‐RODS), grip strength, and Medical Research Council‐sum score (MRC‐SS) and classified visits based on a treatment anchor (ie, decision to restart/increase treatment after reaching a predefined early endpoint of deterioration). The variability of scores in patients without deterioration was calculated using the limits of agreement. We defined optimized MCIDs for deterioration and specific combinations of MCIDs from different outcome measures, and subsequently calculated the accuracies of the (combined) MCIDs. Substantial variability was found in scores of the I‐RODS, grip strength and MRC‐SS in patients without deterioration over time, and most MCIDs were within the limits of the variability observed in patients without deterioration. Some MCID cut‐offs were insensitive but highly specific for detecting deterioration, for example, the MCID‐SE of −1.96 of the I‐RODS and −2 point on the MRC‐SS. Others were sensitive, but less specific, for example, −4 centiles of the I‐RODS. Some combined MCIDs resulted in high specificities and moderate sensitivities. Our results suggest that clinically important deterioration cannot be distinguished from variability over time with currently used MCIDs on the individual level. Combinations of MCIDs might improve the accuracy of determining deterioration, but this needs validation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9321849
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93218492022-07-30 Assessing deterioration using impairment and functional outcome measures in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy: A post‐hoc analysis of the immunoglobulin overtreatment in CIDP trial van Veen, Robin Wieske, Luuk Lucke, Ilse Adrichem, Max E. Merkies, Ingemar S. J. van Schaik, Ivo N. Eftimov, Filip J Peripher Nerv Syst Research Reports It is unclear whether frequently used cutoff values for outcome measures defining minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) can accurately identify meaningful deterioration in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP). We used data from the immunoglobulin overtreatment in CIDP (IOC) trial, in which 60 clinically stable patients with CIDP were randomized to intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) withdrawal or continuation. We calculated change scores of the Inflammatory Rasch‐Built Overall Disability Scale (I‐RODS), grip strength, and Medical Research Council‐sum score (MRC‐SS) and classified visits based on a treatment anchor (ie, decision to restart/increase treatment after reaching a predefined early endpoint of deterioration). The variability of scores in patients without deterioration was calculated using the limits of agreement. We defined optimized MCIDs for deterioration and specific combinations of MCIDs from different outcome measures, and subsequently calculated the accuracies of the (combined) MCIDs. Substantial variability was found in scores of the I‐RODS, grip strength and MRC‐SS in patients without deterioration over time, and most MCIDs were within the limits of the variability observed in patients without deterioration. Some MCID cut‐offs were insensitive but highly specific for detecting deterioration, for example, the MCID‐SE of −1.96 of the I‐RODS and −2 point on the MRC‐SS. Others were sensitive, but less specific, for example, −4 centiles of the I‐RODS. Some combined MCIDs resulted in high specificities and moderate sensitivities. Our results suggest that clinically important deterioration cannot be distinguished from variability over time with currently used MCIDs on the individual level. Combinations of MCIDs might improve the accuracy of determining deterioration, but this needs validation. Wiley Periodicals, Inc. 2022-05-25 2022-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9321849/ /pubmed/35507446 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jns.12497 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of the Peripheral Nervous System published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Peripheral Nerve Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Research Reports
van Veen, Robin
Wieske, Luuk
Lucke, Ilse
Adrichem, Max E.
Merkies, Ingemar S. J.
van Schaik, Ivo N.
Eftimov, Filip
Assessing deterioration using impairment and functional outcome measures in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy: A post‐hoc analysis of the immunoglobulin overtreatment in CIDP trial
title Assessing deterioration using impairment and functional outcome measures in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy: A post‐hoc analysis of the immunoglobulin overtreatment in CIDP trial
title_full Assessing deterioration using impairment and functional outcome measures in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy: A post‐hoc analysis of the immunoglobulin overtreatment in CIDP trial
title_fullStr Assessing deterioration using impairment and functional outcome measures in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy: A post‐hoc analysis of the immunoglobulin overtreatment in CIDP trial
title_full_unstemmed Assessing deterioration using impairment and functional outcome measures in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy: A post‐hoc analysis of the immunoglobulin overtreatment in CIDP trial
title_short Assessing deterioration using impairment and functional outcome measures in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy: A post‐hoc analysis of the immunoglobulin overtreatment in CIDP trial
title_sort assessing deterioration using impairment and functional outcome measures in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy: a post‐hoc analysis of the immunoglobulin overtreatment in cidp trial
topic Research Reports
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9321849/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35507446
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jns.12497
work_keys_str_mv AT vanveenrobin assessingdeteriorationusingimpairmentandfunctionaloutcomemeasuresinchronicinflammatorydemyelinatingpolyneuropathyaposthocanalysisoftheimmunoglobulinovertreatmentincidptrial
AT wieskeluuk assessingdeteriorationusingimpairmentandfunctionaloutcomemeasuresinchronicinflammatorydemyelinatingpolyneuropathyaposthocanalysisoftheimmunoglobulinovertreatmentincidptrial
AT luckeilse assessingdeteriorationusingimpairmentandfunctionaloutcomemeasuresinchronicinflammatorydemyelinatingpolyneuropathyaposthocanalysisoftheimmunoglobulinovertreatmentincidptrial
AT adrichemmaxe assessingdeteriorationusingimpairmentandfunctionaloutcomemeasuresinchronicinflammatorydemyelinatingpolyneuropathyaposthocanalysisoftheimmunoglobulinovertreatmentincidptrial
AT merkiesingemarsj assessingdeteriorationusingimpairmentandfunctionaloutcomemeasuresinchronicinflammatorydemyelinatingpolyneuropathyaposthocanalysisoftheimmunoglobulinovertreatmentincidptrial
AT vanschaikivon assessingdeteriorationusingimpairmentandfunctionaloutcomemeasuresinchronicinflammatorydemyelinatingpolyneuropathyaposthocanalysisoftheimmunoglobulinovertreatmentincidptrial
AT eftimovfilip assessingdeteriorationusingimpairmentandfunctionaloutcomemeasuresinchronicinflammatorydemyelinatingpolyneuropathyaposthocanalysisoftheimmunoglobulinovertreatmentincidptrial