Cargando…
Fallacious, misleading and unhelpful: The case for removing ‘systematic review’ from bioethics nomenclature
Attempts to conduct systematic reviews of ethical arguments in bioethics are fundamentally misguided. All areas of enquiry need thorough and informative literature reviews, and efforts to bring transparency and systematic methods to bioethics are to be welcomed. Nevertheless, the raw materials of bi...
Autores principales: | Birchley, Giles, Ives, Jonathan |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9321889/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35390186 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bioe.13024 |
Ejemplares similares
-
The theorisation of ‘best interests’ in bioethical accounts of decision-making
por: Birchley, Giles
Publicado: (2021) -
A systematic review of empirical bioethics methodologies
por: Davies, Rachel, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Unhelpful microbes inactivate diabetes drug
por: Abbott, Ben
Publicado: (2022) -
Thrombolysis in Inferior Myocardial Infarct – Unhelpful?
por: D’Costa, D F
Publicado: (1999) -
Hiding behind ‘innovation’: the case for regulated risk assessment in surgery
por: Ives, Jonathan, et al.
Publicado: (2022)