Cargando…

Evaluation of Bond Strength of Four Different Root Canal Sealers

The purposes of the study were to evaluate the influence of the sealer’s chemical composition on the interfacial strength between root canal dentin and root filling material, for two different classes of endodontic sealers, and to assess their failure modes. Methods: Forty extracted single-rooted te...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cimpean, Sanda Ileana, Burtea, Adela Loredana Colceriu, Chiorean, Radu Stefan, Dudescu, Mircea Cristian, Antoniac, Aurora, Robu, Alina, Campian, Radu Septimiu, Timis, Lucia Iacobina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9321937/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35888436
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15144966
_version_ 1784756173926301696
author Cimpean, Sanda Ileana
Burtea, Adela Loredana Colceriu
Chiorean, Radu Stefan
Dudescu, Mircea Cristian
Antoniac, Aurora
Robu, Alina
Campian, Radu Septimiu
Timis, Lucia Iacobina
author_facet Cimpean, Sanda Ileana
Burtea, Adela Loredana Colceriu
Chiorean, Radu Stefan
Dudescu, Mircea Cristian
Antoniac, Aurora
Robu, Alina
Campian, Radu Septimiu
Timis, Lucia Iacobina
author_sort Cimpean, Sanda Ileana
collection PubMed
description The purposes of the study were to evaluate the influence of the sealer’s chemical composition on the interfacial strength between root canal dentin and root filling material, for two different classes of endodontic sealers, and to assess their failure modes. Methods: Forty extracted single-rooted teeth were randomly divided into four groups using the following endodontic sealers: RealSeal SE and Resilon (RSSE); EndoSequence BC sealer and BC Point (EBCS); Endoseal MTA and gutta-percha (EDS); Bioroot RCS and gutta-percha (BRS). Teeth were embedded in acrylic resin, and the roots were sectioned horizontally into 1 mm slices. For each slice, the perimeter was measured. A push-out test was performed using an Instron universal testing machine. For each sample, bond strength was calculated. Specimens were examined by SEM investigation in order to analyze the dentin–sealer–core interface. Results were assessed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey and Bonferroni test. Results: Statistical analysis revealed that EDS and gutta-percha had significantly higher resistance to dislodgement compared to the other three groups (p < 0.05). EBCS and BC Point showed significantly greater push-out bond strength values compared to RSSE and Resilon (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Bioceramic endodontic sealers showed a higher bond strength to root dentin than methacrylate resin-based endodontic sealer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9321937
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93219372022-07-27 Evaluation of Bond Strength of Four Different Root Canal Sealers Cimpean, Sanda Ileana Burtea, Adela Loredana Colceriu Chiorean, Radu Stefan Dudescu, Mircea Cristian Antoniac, Aurora Robu, Alina Campian, Radu Septimiu Timis, Lucia Iacobina Materials (Basel) Article The purposes of the study were to evaluate the influence of the sealer’s chemical composition on the interfacial strength between root canal dentin and root filling material, for two different classes of endodontic sealers, and to assess their failure modes. Methods: Forty extracted single-rooted teeth were randomly divided into four groups using the following endodontic sealers: RealSeal SE and Resilon (RSSE); EndoSequence BC sealer and BC Point (EBCS); Endoseal MTA and gutta-percha (EDS); Bioroot RCS and gutta-percha (BRS). Teeth were embedded in acrylic resin, and the roots were sectioned horizontally into 1 mm slices. For each slice, the perimeter was measured. A push-out test was performed using an Instron universal testing machine. For each sample, bond strength was calculated. Specimens were examined by SEM investigation in order to analyze the dentin–sealer–core interface. Results were assessed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey and Bonferroni test. Results: Statistical analysis revealed that EDS and gutta-percha had significantly higher resistance to dislodgement compared to the other three groups (p < 0.05). EBCS and BC Point showed significantly greater push-out bond strength values compared to RSSE and Resilon (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Bioceramic endodontic sealers showed a higher bond strength to root dentin than methacrylate resin-based endodontic sealer. MDPI 2022-07-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9321937/ /pubmed/35888436 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15144966 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Cimpean, Sanda Ileana
Burtea, Adela Loredana Colceriu
Chiorean, Radu Stefan
Dudescu, Mircea Cristian
Antoniac, Aurora
Robu, Alina
Campian, Radu Septimiu
Timis, Lucia Iacobina
Evaluation of Bond Strength of Four Different Root Canal Sealers
title Evaluation of Bond Strength of Four Different Root Canal Sealers
title_full Evaluation of Bond Strength of Four Different Root Canal Sealers
title_fullStr Evaluation of Bond Strength of Four Different Root Canal Sealers
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Bond Strength of Four Different Root Canal Sealers
title_short Evaluation of Bond Strength of Four Different Root Canal Sealers
title_sort evaluation of bond strength of four different root canal sealers
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9321937/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35888436
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15144966
work_keys_str_mv AT cimpeansandaileana evaluationofbondstrengthoffourdifferentrootcanalsealers
AT burteaadelaloredanacolceriu evaluationofbondstrengthoffourdifferentrootcanalsealers
AT chioreanradustefan evaluationofbondstrengthoffourdifferentrootcanalsealers
AT dudescumirceacristian evaluationofbondstrengthoffourdifferentrootcanalsealers
AT antoniacaurora evaluationofbondstrengthoffourdifferentrootcanalsealers
AT robualina evaluationofbondstrengthoffourdifferentrootcanalsealers
AT campianraduseptimiu evaluationofbondstrengthoffourdifferentrootcanalsealers
AT timisluciaiacobina evaluationofbondstrengthoffourdifferentrootcanalsealers