Cargando…
Evaluation of Bond Strength of Four Different Root Canal Sealers
The purposes of the study were to evaluate the influence of the sealer’s chemical composition on the interfacial strength between root canal dentin and root filling material, for two different classes of endodontic sealers, and to assess their failure modes. Methods: Forty extracted single-rooted te...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9321937/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35888436 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15144966 |
_version_ | 1784756173926301696 |
---|---|
author | Cimpean, Sanda Ileana Burtea, Adela Loredana Colceriu Chiorean, Radu Stefan Dudescu, Mircea Cristian Antoniac, Aurora Robu, Alina Campian, Radu Septimiu Timis, Lucia Iacobina |
author_facet | Cimpean, Sanda Ileana Burtea, Adela Loredana Colceriu Chiorean, Radu Stefan Dudescu, Mircea Cristian Antoniac, Aurora Robu, Alina Campian, Radu Septimiu Timis, Lucia Iacobina |
author_sort | Cimpean, Sanda Ileana |
collection | PubMed |
description | The purposes of the study were to evaluate the influence of the sealer’s chemical composition on the interfacial strength between root canal dentin and root filling material, for two different classes of endodontic sealers, and to assess their failure modes. Methods: Forty extracted single-rooted teeth were randomly divided into four groups using the following endodontic sealers: RealSeal SE and Resilon (RSSE); EndoSequence BC sealer and BC Point (EBCS); Endoseal MTA and gutta-percha (EDS); Bioroot RCS and gutta-percha (BRS). Teeth were embedded in acrylic resin, and the roots were sectioned horizontally into 1 mm slices. For each slice, the perimeter was measured. A push-out test was performed using an Instron universal testing machine. For each sample, bond strength was calculated. Specimens were examined by SEM investigation in order to analyze the dentin–sealer–core interface. Results were assessed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey and Bonferroni test. Results: Statistical analysis revealed that EDS and gutta-percha had significantly higher resistance to dislodgement compared to the other three groups (p < 0.05). EBCS and BC Point showed significantly greater push-out bond strength values compared to RSSE and Resilon (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Bioceramic endodontic sealers showed a higher bond strength to root dentin than methacrylate resin-based endodontic sealer. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9321937 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93219372022-07-27 Evaluation of Bond Strength of Four Different Root Canal Sealers Cimpean, Sanda Ileana Burtea, Adela Loredana Colceriu Chiorean, Radu Stefan Dudescu, Mircea Cristian Antoniac, Aurora Robu, Alina Campian, Radu Septimiu Timis, Lucia Iacobina Materials (Basel) Article The purposes of the study were to evaluate the influence of the sealer’s chemical composition on the interfacial strength between root canal dentin and root filling material, for two different classes of endodontic sealers, and to assess their failure modes. Methods: Forty extracted single-rooted teeth were randomly divided into four groups using the following endodontic sealers: RealSeal SE and Resilon (RSSE); EndoSequence BC sealer and BC Point (EBCS); Endoseal MTA and gutta-percha (EDS); Bioroot RCS and gutta-percha (BRS). Teeth were embedded in acrylic resin, and the roots were sectioned horizontally into 1 mm slices. For each slice, the perimeter was measured. A push-out test was performed using an Instron universal testing machine. For each sample, bond strength was calculated. Specimens were examined by SEM investigation in order to analyze the dentin–sealer–core interface. Results were assessed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey and Bonferroni test. Results: Statistical analysis revealed that EDS and gutta-percha had significantly higher resistance to dislodgement compared to the other three groups (p < 0.05). EBCS and BC Point showed significantly greater push-out bond strength values compared to RSSE and Resilon (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Bioceramic endodontic sealers showed a higher bond strength to root dentin than methacrylate resin-based endodontic sealer. MDPI 2022-07-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9321937/ /pubmed/35888436 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15144966 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Cimpean, Sanda Ileana Burtea, Adela Loredana Colceriu Chiorean, Radu Stefan Dudescu, Mircea Cristian Antoniac, Aurora Robu, Alina Campian, Radu Septimiu Timis, Lucia Iacobina Evaluation of Bond Strength of Four Different Root Canal Sealers |
title | Evaluation of Bond Strength of Four Different Root Canal Sealers |
title_full | Evaluation of Bond Strength of Four Different Root Canal Sealers |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of Bond Strength of Four Different Root Canal Sealers |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of Bond Strength of Four Different Root Canal Sealers |
title_short | Evaluation of Bond Strength of Four Different Root Canal Sealers |
title_sort | evaluation of bond strength of four different root canal sealers |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9321937/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35888436 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15144966 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cimpeansandaileana evaluationofbondstrengthoffourdifferentrootcanalsealers AT burteaadelaloredanacolceriu evaluationofbondstrengthoffourdifferentrootcanalsealers AT chioreanradustefan evaluationofbondstrengthoffourdifferentrootcanalsealers AT dudescumirceacristian evaluationofbondstrengthoffourdifferentrootcanalsealers AT antoniacaurora evaluationofbondstrengthoffourdifferentrootcanalsealers AT robualina evaluationofbondstrengthoffourdifferentrootcanalsealers AT campianraduseptimiu evaluationofbondstrengthoffourdifferentrootcanalsealers AT timisluciaiacobina evaluationofbondstrengthoffourdifferentrootcanalsealers |