Cargando…

Current use of biologic therapies for musculoskeletal disease: A survey of board‐certified equine specialists

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the use of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), autologous conditioned serum (ACS), platelet‐rich plasma (PRP), and autologous protein solution (APS) for the treatment of equine musculoskeletal disease by diplomates of the American College of Veterinary Surgery (ACVS), and American...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Knott, Lindsay E., Fonseca‐Martinez, B. Alexander, O'Connor, Annette M., Goodrich, Laurie R., McIlwraith, C. Wayne, Colbath, Aimee C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9322007/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35383972
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/vsu.13805
_version_ 1784756190955175936
author Knott, Lindsay E.
Fonseca‐Martinez, B. Alexander
O'Connor, Annette M.
Goodrich, Laurie R.
McIlwraith, C. Wayne
Colbath, Aimee C.
author_facet Knott, Lindsay E.
Fonseca‐Martinez, B. Alexander
O'Connor, Annette M.
Goodrich, Laurie R.
McIlwraith, C. Wayne
Colbath, Aimee C.
author_sort Knott, Lindsay E.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the use of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), autologous conditioned serum (ACS), platelet‐rich plasma (PRP), and autologous protein solution (APS) for the treatment of equine musculoskeletal disease by diplomates of the American College of Veterinary Surgery (ACVS), and American College of Veterinary Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation (ACVSMR). STUDY DESIGN: Cross‐sectional study. SAMPLE POPULATION: Diplomates (n = 423). METHODS: An email link was sent to ACVS and ACVMR diplomates. A survey contained 59 questions regarding demographics, as well as indications, frequency, adverse effects, and limitations of use. Responses were analyzed using Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty four surveys were analyzed. Years in practice and type of practice were not associated with biologic therapy use. PRP was the most used therapy (120/137; 87.5%). PRP and MSCs were most often administered intralesionally while ACS and APS were most often administered intra‐articularly. ACS (50/104; 48.1%) treatment was repeated commonly within 2 weeks of initial injection. MSCs (39/90; 43.3%) and PRP (38/100; 38%) were commonly repeated 1‐2 months after initial injection and APS was typically repeated >4 months after initial injection (21/53; 39.6%). Local inflammation and expense were the most common adverse effect and limitation of use. CONCLUSION: Diplomates most commonly utilized PRP and MSC intralesionally for soft‐tissue injuries, and ACS and ACP intra‐articularly for joint injury. Protocols for repeated administration varied widely. Local inflammation was a clinical concern with the use of biologics. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Biologic therapies are used commonly by ACVS and ACVSMR diplomates for soft tissue and joint disease.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9322007
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93220072022-07-30 Current use of biologic therapies for musculoskeletal disease: A survey of board‐certified equine specialists Knott, Lindsay E. Fonseca‐Martinez, B. Alexander O'Connor, Annette M. Goodrich, Laurie R. McIlwraith, C. Wayne Colbath, Aimee C. Vet Surg Original Article ‐ Research OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the use of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), autologous conditioned serum (ACS), platelet‐rich plasma (PRP), and autologous protein solution (APS) for the treatment of equine musculoskeletal disease by diplomates of the American College of Veterinary Surgery (ACVS), and American College of Veterinary Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation (ACVSMR). STUDY DESIGN: Cross‐sectional study. SAMPLE POPULATION: Diplomates (n = 423). METHODS: An email link was sent to ACVS and ACVMR diplomates. A survey contained 59 questions regarding demographics, as well as indications, frequency, adverse effects, and limitations of use. Responses were analyzed using Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty four surveys were analyzed. Years in practice and type of practice were not associated with biologic therapy use. PRP was the most used therapy (120/137; 87.5%). PRP and MSCs were most often administered intralesionally while ACS and APS were most often administered intra‐articularly. ACS (50/104; 48.1%) treatment was repeated commonly within 2 weeks of initial injection. MSCs (39/90; 43.3%) and PRP (38/100; 38%) were commonly repeated 1‐2 months after initial injection and APS was typically repeated >4 months after initial injection (21/53; 39.6%). Local inflammation and expense were the most common adverse effect and limitation of use. CONCLUSION: Diplomates most commonly utilized PRP and MSC intralesionally for soft‐tissue injuries, and ACS and ACP intra‐articularly for joint injury. Protocols for repeated administration varied widely. Local inflammation was a clinical concern with the use of biologics. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Biologic therapies are used commonly by ACVS and ACVSMR diplomates for soft tissue and joint disease. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2022-04-05 2022-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9322007/ /pubmed/35383972 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/vsu.13805 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Veterinary Surgery published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Veterinary Surgeons. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Article ‐ Research
Knott, Lindsay E.
Fonseca‐Martinez, B. Alexander
O'Connor, Annette M.
Goodrich, Laurie R.
McIlwraith, C. Wayne
Colbath, Aimee C.
Current use of biologic therapies for musculoskeletal disease: A survey of board‐certified equine specialists
title Current use of biologic therapies for musculoskeletal disease: A survey of board‐certified equine specialists
title_full Current use of biologic therapies for musculoskeletal disease: A survey of board‐certified equine specialists
title_fullStr Current use of biologic therapies for musculoskeletal disease: A survey of board‐certified equine specialists
title_full_unstemmed Current use of biologic therapies for musculoskeletal disease: A survey of board‐certified equine specialists
title_short Current use of biologic therapies for musculoskeletal disease: A survey of board‐certified equine specialists
title_sort current use of biologic therapies for musculoskeletal disease: a survey of board‐certified equine specialists
topic Original Article ‐ Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9322007/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35383972
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/vsu.13805
work_keys_str_mv AT knottlindsaye currentuseofbiologictherapiesformusculoskeletaldiseaseasurveyofboardcertifiedequinespecialists
AT fonsecamartinezbalexander currentuseofbiologictherapiesformusculoskeletaldiseaseasurveyofboardcertifiedequinespecialists
AT oconnorannettem currentuseofbiologictherapiesformusculoskeletaldiseaseasurveyofboardcertifiedequinespecialists
AT goodrichlaurier currentuseofbiologictherapiesformusculoskeletaldiseaseasurveyofboardcertifiedequinespecialists
AT mcilwraithcwayne currentuseofbiologictherapiesformusculoskeletaldiseaseasurveyofboardcertifiedequinespecialists
AT colbathaimeec currentuseofbiologictherapiesformusculoskeletaldiseaseasurveyofboardcertifiedequinespecialists