Cargando…

Developmental profiles of children at risk for autism spectrum disorder at school entry

Functional abilities in children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) are highly heterogenous, and impairments can overlap with non‐ASD neurodevelopmental disorders. We compared the profiles of children assessed for ASD with and without an ASD diagnosis using a retrospective cohort study of 101,739 c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ip, Angie, Poon, Brenda T., Hanley, Gillian, Guhn, Martin, Oberlander, Tim F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9322442/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35586913
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aur.2742
_version_ 1784756304864083968
author Ip, Angie
Poon, Brenda T.
Hanley, Gillian
Guhn, Martin
Oberlander, Tim F.
author_facet Ip, Angie
Poon, Brenda T.
Hanley, Gillian
Guhn, Martin
Oberlander, Tim F.
author_sort Ip, Angie
collection PubMed
description Functional abilities in children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) are highly heterogenous, and impairments can overlap with non‐ASD neurodevelopmental disorders. We compared the profiles of children assessed for ASD with and without an ASD diagnosis using a retrospective cohort study of 101,739 children born in British Columbia (2000–2008). The children were grouped into the following five comparison groups: (1) ASD− (n = 1131), (2) ASD+ (n = 1583), (3) Ministry of Education designated ASD+ (n = 654), (4) special need other than ASD (n = 11,663), and (5) typically developing (n = 86,708). Five developmental domains were assessed using the Early Development Instrument. ANCOVA was used to control for covariates, Tukey's HSD test for multiple comparisons, and Cohen's d for effect size. The ASD− group had slightly higher scores than the ASD+ group with small to medium effect sizes in all domains (d = 0.20–0.48). The ASD− group had slightly higher scores than the Ministry of Education ASD+ group in only three domains with small effect sizes (d = 0.21–0.25). The ASD− group had lower scores in all domains compared to the typically developing group with large effect sizes in all domains (d = 1.12–1.77). The ASD− group received less education funding at school entry than both ASD+ groups. Overall, only small to medium differences in development were detected between the ASD− and ASD+ groups. While these children differ diagnostically, they share similar functional profiles and have substantially more difficulties than typically developing children. Therefore, differences in levels of support at school entry raise critical questions of equity. LAY SUMMARY: Comparison of children in British Columbia who have been referred for an autism assessment, with or without a diagnosis, shows similarities in their functional and developmental profiles in kindergarten. Furthermore, both groups of children have more difficulties than typically developing children. However, children who have been referred for assessment without an autism diagnosis receive less financial support at school entry, raising important questions on equity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9322442
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93224422022-07-30 Developmental profiles of children at risk for autism spectrum disorder at school entry Ip, Angie Poon, Brenda T. Hanley, Gillian Guhn, Martin Oberlander, Tim F. Autism Res PSYCHOLOGY Functional abilities in children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) are highly heterogenous, and impairments can overlap with non‐ASD neurodevelopmental disorders. We compared the profiles of children assessed for ASD with and without an ASD diagnosis using a retrospective cohort study of 101,739 children born in British Columbia (2000–2008). The children were grouped into the following five comparison groups: (1) ASD− (n = 1131), (2) ASD+ (n = 1583), (3) Ministry of Education designated ASD+ (n = 654), (4) special need other than ASD (n = 11,663), and (5) typically developing (n = 86,708). Five developmental domains were assessed using the Early Development Instrument. ANCOVA was used to control for covariates, Tukey's HSD test for multiple comparisons, and Cohen's d for effect size. The ASD− group had slightly higher scores than the ASD+ group with small to medium effect sizes in all domains (d = 0.20–0.48). The ASD− group had slightly higher scores than the Ministry of Education ASD+ group in only three domains with small effect sizes (d = 0.21–0.25). The ASD− group had lower scores in all domains compared to the typically developing group with large effect sizes in all domains (d = 1.12–1.77). The ASD− group received less education funding at school entry than both ASD+ groups. Overall, only small to medium differences in development were detected between the ASD− and ASD+ groups. While these children differ diagnostically, they share similar functional profiles and have substantially more difficulties than typically developing children. Therefore, differences in levels of support at school entry raise critical questions of equity. LAY SUMMARY: Comparison of children in British Columbia who have been referred for an autism assessment, with or without a diagnosis, shows similarities in their functional and developmental profiles in kindergarten. Furthermore, both groups of children have more difficulties than typically developing children. However, children who have been referred for assessment without an autism diagnosis receive less financial support at school entry, raising important questions on equity. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2022-05-19 2022-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9322442/ /pubmed/35586913 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aur.2742 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Autism Research published by International Society for Autism Research and Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle PSYCHOLOGY
Ip, Angie
Poon, Brenda T.
Hanley, Gillian
Guhn, Martin
Oberlander, Tim F.
Developmental profiles of children at risk for autism spectrum disorder at school entry
title Developmental profiles of children at risk for autism spectrum disorder at school entry
title_full Developmental profiles of children at risk for autism spectrum disorder at school entry
title_fullStr Developmental profiles of children at risk for autism spectrum disorder at school entry
title_full_unstemmed Developmental profiles of children at risk for autism spectrum disorder at school entry
title_short Developmental profiles of children at risk for autism spectrum disorder at school entry
title_sort developmental profiles of children at risk for autism spectrum disorder at school entry
topic PSYCHOLOGY
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9322442/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35586913
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aur.2742
work_keys_str_mv AT ipangie developmentalprofilesofchildrenatriskforautismspectrumdisorderatschoolentry
AT poonbrendat developmentalprofilesofchildrenatriskforautismspectrumdisorderatschoolentry
AT hanleygillian developmentalprofilesofchildrenatriskforautismspectrumdisorderatschoolentry
AT guhnmartin developmentalprofilesofchildrenatriskforautismspectrumdisorderatschoolentry
AT oberlandertimf developmentalprofilesofchildrenatriskforautismspectrumdisorderatschoolentry