Cargando…

The evolution of the additive variance of a trait under stabilizing selection after autopolyploidization

Whole‐genome duplication is a common mutation in eukaryotes with far‐reaching phenotypic effects. The resulting morphological, physiological and fitness consequences and how they affect the survival probability of polyploid lineages are intensively studied, but little is known about the effect of ge...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Clo, Josselin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9322463/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35506572
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jeb.14010
_version_ 1784756309995814912
author Clo, Josselin
author_facet Clo, Josselin
author_sort Clo, Josselin
collection PubMed
description Whole‐genome duplication is a common mutation in eukaryotes with far‐reaching phenotypic effects. The resulting morphological, physiological and fitness consequences and how they affect the survival probability of polyploid lineages are intensively studied, but little is known about the effect of genome doubling on the evolutionary potential of populations. Historically, it has been argued polyploids should be less able to adapt because gene duplication dilutes the effects of alleles, such that polyploids are less likely to evolve new adaptive gene complexes compared with diploids. In this paper, I investigate the short‐ and long‐term consequences of genome doubling on the additive genetic variance of populations. To do so, I extended the classical models of quantitative traits under stabilizing selection to study the evolution of the additive variance of the trait under study after a shift from diploidy to tetraploidy. I found that, for realistic allele‐dosage effects, polyploidization is associated with an initial decrease in adaptive potential. In the long term, the better masking of recessive deleterious mutations associated with polyploidy compensates for the initial decrease in additive variance. The time for the tetraploid populations to reach or exceed the additive variance of their diploid progenitors is generally lower than 200 generations. These results highlight that polyploidization per se has a negligible negative effect on the adaptive potential of populations in the short term, and a substantial positive effect in the long term.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9322463
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93224632022-07-30 The evolution of the additive variance of a trait under stabilizing selection after autopolyploidization Clo, Josselin J Evol Biol Short Communication Whole‐genome duplication is a common mutation in eukaryotes with far‐reaching phenotypic effects. The resulting morphological, physiological and fitness consequences and how they affect the survival probability of polyploid lineages are intensively studied, but little is known about the effect of genome doubling on the evolutionary potential of populations. Historically, it has been argued polyploids should be less able to adapt because gene duplication dilutes the effects of alleles, such that polyploids are less likely to evolve new adaptive gene complexes compared with diploids. In this paper, I investigate the short‐ and long‐term consequences of genome doubling on the additive genetic variance of populations. To do so, I extended the classical models of quantitative traits under stabilizing selection to study the evolution of the additive variance of the trait under study after a shift from diploidy to tetraploidy. I found that, for realistic allele‐dosage effects, polyploidization is associated with an initial decrease in adaptive potential. In the long term, the better masking of recessive deleterious mutations associated with polyploidy compensates for the initial decrease in additive variance. The time for the tetraploid populations to reach or exceed the additive variance of their diploid progenitors is generally lower than 200 generations. These results highlight that polyploidization per se has a negligible negative effect on the adaptive potential of populations in the short term, and a substantial positive effect in the long term. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-05-04 2022-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9322463/ /pubmed/35506572 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jeb.14010 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Evolutionary Biology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society for Evolutionary Biology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Short Communication
Clo, Josselin
The evolution of the additive variance of a trait under stabilizing selection after autopolyploidization
title The evolution of the additive variance of a trait under stabilizing selection after autopolyploidization
title_full The evolution of the additive variance of a trait under stabilizing selection after autopolyploidization
title_fullStr The evolution of the additive variance of a trait under stabilizing selection after autopolyploidization
title_full_unstemmed The evolution of the additive variance of a trait under stabilizing selection after autopolyploidization
title_short The evolution of the additive variance of a trait under stabilizing selection after autopolyploidization
title_sort evolution of the additive variance of a trait under stabilizing selection after autopolyploidization
topic Short Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9322463/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35506572
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jeb.14010
work_keys_str_mv AT clojosselin theevolutionoftheadditivevarianceofatraitunderstabilizingselectionafterautopolyploidization
AT clojosselin evolutionoftheadditivevarianceofatraitunderstabilizingselectionafterautopolyploidization