Cargando…

Disability‐based arguments against assisted dying laws

Some of the most common arguments against legalizing assisted dying are based on appealing to the rights of people with disabilities. This article identifies and responds to those arguments, including that people with disabilities univocally oppose assisted dying laws; that those laws harm people wi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Colburn, Ben
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9322678/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35389513
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bioe.13036
_version_ 1784756364108627968
author Colburn, Ben
author_facet Colburn, Ben
author_sort Colburn, Ben
collection PubMed
description Some of the most common arguments against legalizing assisted dying are based on appealing to the rights of people with disabilities. This article identifies and responds to those arguments, including that people with disabilities univocally oppose assisted dying laws; that those laws harm people with disabilities, or show disrespect; and that those laws undermine other vital aspects of healthcare. Drawing on philosophical argument, as well as on evidence from jurisdictions where assisted dying is legal, the article concludes that considerations of disability do not in fact generate good arguments against assisted dying laws. In fact, the opposite is true. There are nevertheless important lessons that proponents and defenders of such laws can learn in conversation with people with disabilities, including about safeguards on assisted dying to protect their well‐being and autonomy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9322678
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93226782022-07-30 Disability‐based arguments against assisted dying laws Colburn, Ben Bioethics Original Articles Some of the most common arguments against legalizing assisted dying are based on appealing to the rights of people with disabilities. This article identifies and responds to those arguments, including that people with disabilities univocally oppose assisted dying laws; that those laws harm people with disabilities, or show disrespect; and that those laws undermine other vital aspects of healthcare. Drawing on philosophical argument, as well as on evidence from jurisdictions where assisted dying is legal, the article concludes that considerations of disability do not in fact generate good arguments against assisted dying laws. In fact, the opposite is true. There are nevertheless important lessons that proponents and defenders of such laws can learn in conversation with people with disabilities, including about safeguards on assisted dying to protect their well‐being and autonomy. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-04-07 2022-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9322678/ /pubmed/35389513 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bioe.13036 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Bioethics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Colburn, Ben
Disability‐based arguments against assisted dying laws
title Disability‐based arguments against assisted dying laws
title_full Disability‐based arguments against assisted dying laws
title_fullStr Disability‐based arguments against assisted dying laws
title_full_unstemmed Disability‐based arguments against assisted dying laws
title_short Disability‐based arguments against assisted dying laws
title_sort disability‐based arguments against assisted dying laws
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9322678/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35389513
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bioe.13036
work_keys_str_mv AT colburnben disabilitybasedargumentsagainstassisteddyinglaws