Cargando…

A Comparative Evaluation of the Strain Transmitted through Prostheses on Implants with Two Different Macro-Structures and Connection during Insertion and Loading Phase: An In Vitro Study

Background: The purpose of this study was to measure and compare the strain levels in the peri-implant bone as generated by the blade-like implant (BLI) and the screw-type implant (STI) with two different internal connections (hexagonal and conical) and with a 1:1 and 2:1 crown/implant (C/I) ratio....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kassem, Riyam, Samara, Amar, Biadsee, Ameer, Masarwa, Shchada, Mtanis, Tarek, Ormianer, Zeev
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9322821/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35888421
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15144954
_version_ 1784756398793424896
author Kassem, Riyam
Samara, Amar
Biadsee, Ameer
Masarwa, Shchada
Mtanis, Tarek
Ormianer, Zeev
author_facet Kassem, Riyam
Samara, Amar
Biadsee, Ameer
Masarwa, Shchada
Mtanis, Tarek
Ormianer, Zeev
author_sort Kassem, Riyam
collection PubMed
description Background: The purpose of this study was to measure and compare the strain levels in the peri-implant bone as generated by the blade-like implant (BLI) and the screw-type implant (STI) with two different internal connections (hexagonal and conical) and with a 1:1 and 2:1 crown/implant (C/I) ratio. Methods: The implants (BLI and STI) were placed into sawbones according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Two strain gauges, horizontal and vertical to the implant axis, were placed around each implant on the bone surface 1 mm from the cervical part. Each implant was loaded by a material testing machine at a force of 100 N. Micro-strains (με) generated in the surrounding bone were measured by a strain gauge and recorded. Results: Recorded micro-strains were not significant in both the insertion and loading phases (p < 0.0625). The average recorded micro-strain values were lower in the horizontal dimension of STI with hexagonal connection when the C/I ratio was 2:1 compared with BLI, 210 με and 443 με, respectively. Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, implant design, implant-abutment connection and C/I ratio did not influence strain values in bone and there is no statistically significant effect of these parameters on bone.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9322821
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93228212022-07-27 A Comparative Evaluation of the Strain Transmitted through Prostheses on Implants with Two Different Macro-Structures and Connection during Insertion and Loading Phase: An In Vitro Study Kassem, Riyam Samara, Amar Biadsee, Ameer Masarwa, Shchada Mtanis, Tarek Ormianer, Zeev Materials (Basel) Article Background: The purpose of this study was to measure and compare the strain levels in the peri-implant bone as generated by the blade-like implant (BLI) and the screw-type implant (STI) with two different internal connections (hexagonal and conical) and with a 1:1 and 2:1 crown/implant (C/I) ratio. Methods: The implants (BLI and STI) were placed into sawbones according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Two strain gauges, horizontal and vertical to the implant axis, were placed around each implant on the bone surface 1 mm from the cervical part. Each implant was loaded by a material testing machine at a force of 100 N. Micro-strains (με) generated in the surrounding bone were measured by a strain gauge and recorded. Results: Recorded micro-strains were not significant in both the insertion and loading phases (p < 0.0625). The average recorded micro-strain values were lower in the horizontal dimension of STI with hexagonal connection when the C/I ratio was 2:1 compared with BLI, 210 με and 443 με, respectively. Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, implant design, implant-abutment connection and C/I ratio did not influence strain values in bone and there is no statistically significant effect of these parameters on bone. MDPI 2022-07-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9322821/ /pubmed/35888421 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15144954 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Kassem, Riyam
Samara, Amar
Biadsee, Ameer
Masarwa, Shchada
Mtanis, Tarek
Ormianer, Zeev
A Comparative Evaluation of the Strain Transmitted through Prostheses on Implants with Two Different Macro-Structures and Connection during Insertion and Loading Phase: An In Vitro Study
title A Comparative Evaluation of the Strain Transmitted through Prostheses on Implants with Two Different Macro-Structures and Connection during Insertion and Loading Phase: An In Vitro Study
title_full A Comparative Evaluation of the Strain Transmitted through Prostheses on Implants with Two Different Macro-Structures and Connection during Insertion and Loading Phase: An In Vitro Study
title_fullStr A Comparative Evaluation of the Strain Transmitted through Prostheses on Implants with Two Different Macro-Structures and Connection during Insertion and Loading Phase: An In Vitro Study
title_full_unstemmed A Comparative Evaluation of the Strain Transmitted through Prostheses on Implants with Two Different Macro-Structures and Connection during Insertion and Loading Phase: An In Vitro Study
title_short A Comparative Evaluation of the Strain Transmitted through Prostheses on Implants with Two Different Macro-Structures and Connection during Insertion and Loading Phase: An In Vitro Study
title_sort comparative evaluation of the strain transmitted through prostheses on implants with two different macro-structures and connection during insertion and loading phase: an in vitro study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9322821/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35888421
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15144954
work_keys_str_mv AT kassemriyam acomparativeevaluationofthestraintransmittedthroughprosthesesonimplantswithtwodifferentmacrostructuresandconnectionduringinsertionandloadingphaseaninvitrostudy
AT samaraamar acomparativeevaluationofthestraintransmittedthroughprosthesesonimplantswithtwodifferentmacrostructuresandconnectionduringinsertionandloadingphaseaninvitrostudy
AT biadseeameer acomparativeevaluationofthestraintransmittedthroughprosthesesonimplantswithtwodifferentmacrostructuresandconnectionduringinsertionandloadingphaseaninvitrostudy
AT masarwashchada acomparativeevaluationofthestraintransmittedthroughprosthesesonimplantswithtwodifferentmacrostructuresandconnectionduringinsertionandloadingphaseaninvitrostudy
AT mtanistarek acomparativeevaluationofthestraintransmittedthroughprosthesesonimplantswithtwodifferentmacrostructuresandconnectionduringinsertionandloadingphaseaninvitrostudy
AT ormianerzeev acomparativeevaluationofthestraintransmittedthroughprosthesesonimplantswithtwodifferentmacrostructuresandconnectionduringinsertionandloadingphaseaninvitrostudy
AT kassemriyam comparativeevaluationofthestraintransmittedthroughprosthesesonimplantswithtwodifferentmacrostructuresandconnectionduringinsertionandloadingphaseaninvitrostudy
AT samaraamar comparativeevaluationofthestraintransmittedthroughprosthesesonimplantswithtwodifferentmacrostructuresandconnectionduringinsertionandloadingphaseaninvitrostudy
AT biadseeameer comparativeevaluationofthestraintransmittedthroughprosthesesonimplantswithtwodifferentmacrostructuresandconnectionduringinsertionandloadingphaseaninvitrostudy
AT masarwashchada comparativeevaluationofthestraintransmittedthroughprosthesesonimplantswithtwodifferentmacrostructuresandconnectionduringinsertionandloadingphaseaninvitrostudy
AT mtanistarek comparativeevaluationofthestraintransmittedthroughprosthesesonimplantswithtwodifferentmacrostructuresandconnectionduringinsertionandloadingphaseaninvitrostudy
AT ormianerzeev comparativeevaluationofthestraintransmittedthroughprosthesesonimplantswithtwodifferentmacrostructuresandconnectionduringinsertionandloadingphaseaninvitrostudy