Cargando…
Norwegian Consumers’ Skepticism towards Smoke-Flavoring of Salmon—Is It for Real?
The aim of the present study was to explore Norwegian consumers’ attitudes toward smoke-flavoring of cold smoked salmon (CSS), by conducting a digital survey and focus group discussions. Some of the smoke-flavoring techniques, like atomized purified condensed smoke, is considered healthier than conv...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9323272/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35885413 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods11142170 |
_version_ | 1784756509596450816 |
---|---|
author | Waldenstrøm, Lene Wahlgren, Marte Berg Strand, Åse Lerfall, Jørgen Gaarder, Mari Øvrum |
author_facet | Waldenstrøm, Lene Wahlgren, Marte Berg Strand, Åse Lerfall, Jørgen Gaarder, Mari Øvrum |
author_sort | Waldenstrøm, Lene |
collection | PubMed |
description | The aim of the present study was to explore Norwegian consumers’ attitudes toward smoke-flavoring of cold smoked salmon (CSS), by conducting a digital survey and focus group discussions. Some of the smoke-flavoring techniques, like atomized purified condensed smoke, is considered healthier than conventional smoking. Manufacturers of CSS are, however, hesitant to use all kinds of smoke-flavoring due to expected consumer skepticism. In the digital survey, the expected skepticism was confirmed (n = 487). Only 15% of the respondents were positively oriented toward smoke-flavoring of CSS. The selection criterion for the focus group discussion was based on the results from the survey and resulted in three attitude-oriented focus groups (negative, neutral, and positive). The negative focus group considered smoke-flavored CSS to be unnatural and out of the question to buy or eat. Unlike the negative focus group, the neutral group was curious to learn more and open to potential smoke-flavor benefits. However, credible information or science was crucial to influence CSS choice. Future studies may investigate whether the existent of this large group of curious neutral consumers (47% of the respondents) influence manufacturers (of CSS) skepticism or how various types of product information could steer consumer acceptance of smoke-flavoring of CSS. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9323272 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93232722022-07-27 Norwegian Consumers’ Skepticism towards Smoke-Flavoring of Salmon—Is It for Real? Waldenstrøm, Lene Wahlgren, Marte Berg Strand, Åse Lerfall, Jørgen Gaarder, Mari Øvrum Foods Article The aim of the present study was to explore Norwegian consumers’ attitudes toward smoke-flavoring of cold smoked salmon (CSS), by conducting a digital survey and focus group discussions. Some of the smoke-flavoring techniques, like atomized purified condensed smoke, is considered healthier than conventional smoking. Manufacturers of CSS are, however, hesitant to use all kinds of smoke-flavoring due to expected consumer skepticism. In the digital survey, the expected skepticism was confirmed (n = 487). Only 15% of the respondents were positively oriented toward smoke-flavoring of CSS. The selection criterion for the focus group discussion was based on the results from the survey and resulted in three attitude-oriented focus groups (negative, neutral, and positive). The negative focus group considered smoke-flavored CSS to be unnatural and out of the question to buy or eat. Unlike the negative focus group, the neutral group was curious to learn more and open to potential smoke-flavor benefits. However, credible information or science was crucial to influence CSS choice. Future studies may investigate whether the existent of this large group of curious neutral consumers (47% of the respondents) influence manufacturers (of CSS) skepticism or how various types of product information could steer consumer acceptance of smoke-flavoring of CSS. MDPI 2022-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9323272/ /pubmed/35885413 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods11142170 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Waldenstrøm, Lene Wahlgren, Marte Berg Strand, Åse Lerfall, Jørgen Gaarder, Mari Øvrum Norwegian Consumers’ Skepticism towards Smoke-Flavoring of Salmon—Is It for Real? |
title | Norwegian Consumers’ Skepticism towards Smoke-Flavoring of Salmon—Is It for Real? |
title_full | Norwegian Consumers’ Skepticism towards Smoke-Flavoring of Salmon—Is It for Real? |
title_fullStr | Norwegian Consumers’ Skepticism towards Smoke-Flavoring of Salmon—Is It for Real? |
title_full_unstemmed | Norwegian Consumers’ Skepticism towards Smoke-Flavoring of Salmon—Is It for Real? |
title_short | Norwegian Consumers’ Skepticism towards Smoke-Flavoring of Salmon—Is It for Real? |
title_sort | norwegian consumers’ skepticism towards smoke-flavoring of salmon—is it for real? |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9323272/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35885413 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods11142170 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT waldenstrømlene norwegianconsumersskepticismtowardssmokeflavoringofsalmonisitforreal AT wahlgrenmarteberg norwegianconsumersskepticismtowardssmokeflavoringofsalmonisitforreal AT strandase norwegianconsumersskepticismtowardssmokeflavoringofsalmonisitforreal AT lerfalljørgen norwegianconsumersskepticismtowardssmokeflavoringofsalmonisitforreal AT gaardermariøvrum norwegianconsumersskepticismtowardssmokeflavoringofsalmonisitforreal |