Cargando…

Norwegian Consumers’ Skepticism towards Smoke-Flavoring of Salmon—Is It for Real?

The aim of the present study was to explore Norwegian consumers’ attitudes toward smoke-flavoring of cold smoked salmon (CSS), by conducting a digital survey and focus group discussions. Some of the smoke-flavoring techniques, like atomized purified condensed smoke, is considered healthier than conv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Waldenstrøm, Lene, Wahlgren, Marte Berg, Strand, Åse, Lerfall, Jørgen, Gaarder, Mari Øvrum
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9323272/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35885413
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods11142170
_version_ 1784756509596450816
author Waldenstrøm, Lene
Wahlgren, Marte Berg
Strand, Åse
Lerfall, Jørgen
Gaarder, Mari Øvrum
author_facet Waldenstrøm, Lene
Wahlgren, Marte Berg
Strand, Åse
Lerfall, Jørgen
Gaarder, Mari Øvrum
author_sort Waldenstrøm, Lene
collection PubMed
description The aim of the present study was to explore Norwegian consumers’ attitudes toward smoke-flavoring of cold smoked salmon (CSS), by conducting a digital survey and focus group discussions. Some of the smoke-flavoring techniques, like atomized purified condensed smoke, is considered healthier than conventional smoking. Manufacturers of CSS are, however, hesitant to use all kinds of smoke-flavoring due to expected consumer skepticism. In the digital survey, the expected skepticism was confirmed (n = 487). Only 15% of the respondents were positively oriented toward smoke-flavoring of CSS. The selection criterion for the focus group discussion was based on the results from the survey and resulted in three attitude-oriented focus groups (negative, neutral, and positive). The negative focus group considered smoke-flavored CSS to be unnatural and out of the question to buy or eat. Unlike the negative focus group, the neutral group was curious to learn more and open to potential smoke-flavor benefits. However, credible information or science was crucial to influence CSS choice. Future studies may investigate whether the existent of this large group of curious neutral consumers (47% of the respondents) influence manufacturers (of CSS) skepticism or how various types of product information could steer consumer acceptance of smoke-flavoring of CSS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9323272
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93232722022-07-27 Norwegian Consumers’ Skepticism towards Smoke-Flavoring of Salmon—Is It for Real? Waldenstrøm, Lene Wahlgren, Marte Berg Strand, Åse Lerfall, Jørgen Gaarder, Mari Øvrum Foods Article The aim of the present study was to explore Norwegian consumers’ attitudes toward smoke-flavoring of cold smoked salmon (CSS), by conducting a digital survey and focus group discussions. Some of the smoke-flavoring techniques, like atomized purified condensed smoke, is considered healthier than conventional smoking. Manufacturers of CSS are, however, hesitant to use all kinds of smoke-flavoring due to expected consumer skepticism. In the digital survey, the expected skepticism was confirmed (n = 487). Only 15% of the respondents were positively oriented toward smoke-flavoring of CSS. The selection criterion for the focus group discussion was based on the results from the survey and resulted in three attitude-oriented focus groups (negative, neutral, and positive). The negative focus group considered smoke-flavored CSS to be unnatural and out of the question to buy or eat. Unlike the negative focus group, the neutral group was curious to learn more and open to potential smoke-flavor benefits. However, credible information or science was crucial to influence CSS choice. Future studies may investigate whether the existent of this large group of curious neutral consumers (47% of the respondents) influence manufacturers (of CSS) skepticism or how various types of product information could steer consumer acceptance of smoke-flavoring of CSS. MDPI 2022-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9323272/ /pubmed/35885413 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods11142170 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Waldenstrøm, Lene
Wahlgren, Marte Berg
Strand, Åse
Lerfall, Jørgen
Gaarder, Mari Øvrum
Norwegian Consumers’ Skepticism towards Smoke-Flavoring of Salmon—Is It for Real?
title Norwegian Consumers’ Skepticism towards Smoke-Flavoring of Salmon—Is It for Real?
title_full Norwegian Consumers’ Skepticism towards Smoke-Flavoring of Salmon—Is It for Real?
title_fullStr Norwegian Consumers’ Skepticism towards Smoke-Flavoring of Salmon—Is It for Real?
title_full_unstemmed Norwegian Consumers’ Skepticism towards Smoke-Flavoring of Salmon—Is It for Real?
title_short Norwegian Consumers’ Skepticism towards Smoke-Flavoring of Salmon—Is It for Real?
title_sort norwegian consumers’ skepticism towards smoke-flavoring of salmon—is it for real?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9323272/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35885413
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods11142170
work_keys_str_mv AT waldenstrømlene norwegianconsumersskepticismtowardssmokeflavoringofsalmonisitforreal
AT wahlgrenmarteberg norwegianconsumersskepticismtowardssmokeflavoringofsalmonisitforreal
AT strandase norwegianconsumersskepticismtowardssmokeflavoringofsalmonisitforreal
AT lerfalljørgen norwegianconsumersskepticismtowardssmokeflavoringofsalmonisitforreal
AT gaardermariøvrum norwegianconsumersskepticismtowardssmokeflavoringofsalmonisitforreal