Cargando…
Does the Length of Mini Dental Implants Affect Their Resistance to Failure by Overloading?
Objective: We aimed to evaluate the failure resistance of different lengths of mini dental implants from the same manufacturer, and to assess their failure following overloading. Materials and Methods: According to the ISO 14801, 15 mini dental implants 2.4 mm in diameter, with lengths of 8.5 mm, 10...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9323363/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35877391 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj10070117 |
_version_ | 1784756532221575168 |
---|---|
author | Alshenaiber, Rafif Silikas, Nick Barclay, Craig |
author_facet | Alshenaiber, Rafif Silikas, Nick Barclay, Craig |
author_sort | Alshenaiber, Rafif |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective: We aimed to evaluate the failure resistance of different lengths of mini dental implants from the same manufacturer, and to assess their failure following overloading. Materials and Methods: According to the ISO 14801, 15 mini dental implants 2.4 mm in diameter, with lengths of 8.5 mm, 10 mm, or 13 mm, were subjected to compression loading until failure using a universal testing machine. The mean load-to-failure values for each length of the mini dental implants were calculated and analysed using SPSS(®), via one-way ANOVA (p < 0.05). Results: The mean load to failure for mini dental implants was 329 N (SD 6.23), 326 N (SD 5.95), and 325 N (SD 6.99) for the 13 mm, 10 mm, and 8.5 mm implants, respectively. A comparison of means showed no significant difference between the groups (p = 0.70). The tested mini dental implants exhibited bending failure modes below the first thread. Conclusion: Under high compressive loading testing, there was no effect of the length on the failure of the mini dental implants following overloading. Moreover, all tested mini dental implants with different lengths showed the same failure mode and distortion location. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9323363 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93233632022-07-27 Does the Length of Mini Dental Implants Affect Their Resistance to Failure by Overloading? Alshenaiber, Rafif Silikas, Nick Barclay, Craig Dent J (Basel) Article Objective: We aimed to evaluate the failure resistance of different lengths of mini dental implants from the same manufacturer, and to assess their failure following overloading. Materials and Methods: According to the ISO 14801, 15 mini dental implants 2.4 mm in diameter, with lengths of 8.5 mm, 10 mm, or 13 mm, were subjected to compression loading until failure using a universal testing machine. The mean load-to-failure values for each length of the mini dental implants were calculated and analysed using SPSS(®), via one-way ANOVA (p < 0.05). Results: The mean load to failure for mini dental implants was 329 N (SD 6.23), 326 N (SD 5.95), and 325 N (SD 6.99) for the 13 mm, 10 mm, and 8.5 mm implants, respectively. A comparison of means showed no significant difference between the groups (p = 0.70). The tested mini dental implants exhibited bending failure modes below the first thread. Conclusion: Under high compressive loading testing, there was no effect of the length on the failure of the mini dental implants following overloading. Moreover, all tested mini dental implants with different lengths showed the same failure mode and distortion location. MDPI 2022-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9323363/ /pubmed/35877391 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj10070117 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Alshenaiber, Rafif Silikas, Nick Barclay, Craig Does the Length of Mini Dental Implants Affect Their Resistance to Failure by Overloading? |
title | Does the Length of Mini Dental Implants Affect Their Resistance to Failure by Overloading? |
title_full | Does the Length of Mini Dental Implants Affect Their Resistance to Failure by Overloading? |
title_fullStr | Does the Length of Mini Dental Implants Affect Their Resistance to Failure by Overloading? |
title_full_unstemmed | Does the Length of Mini Dental Implants Affect Their Resistance to Failure by Overloading? |
title_short | Does the Length of Mini Dental Implants Affect Their Resistance to Failure by Overloading? |
title_sort | does the length of mini dental implants affect their resistance to failure by overloading? |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9323363/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35877391 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj10070117 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alshenaiberrafif doesthelengthofminidentalimplantsaffecttheirresistancetofailurebyoverloading AT silikasnick doesthelengthofminidentalimplantsaffecttheirresistancetofailurebyoverloading AT barclaycraig doesthelengthofminidentalimplantsaffecttheirresistancetofailurebyoverloading |