Cargando…

Does the Length of Mini Dental Implants Affect Their Resistance to Failure by Overloading?

Objective: We aimed to evaluate the failure resistance of different lengths of mini dental implants from the same manufacturer, and to assess their failure following overloading. Materials and Methods: According to the ISO 14801, 15 mini dental implants 2.4 mm in diameter, with lengths of 8.5 mm, 10...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alshenaiber, Rafif, Silikas, Nick, Barclay, Craig
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9323363/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35877391
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj10070117
_version_ 1784756532221575168
author Alshenaiber, Rafif
Silikas, Nick
Barclay, Craig
author_facet Alshenaiber, Rafif
Silikas, Nick
Barclay, Craig
author_sort Alshenaiber, Rafif
collection PubMed
description Objective: We aimed to evaluate the failure resistance of different lengths of mini dental implants from the same manufacturer, and to assess their failure following overloading. Materials and Methods: According to the ISO 14801, 15 mini dental implants 2.4 mm in diameter, with lengths of 8.5 mm, 10 mm, or 13 mm, were subjected to compression loading until failure using a universal testing machine. The mean load-to-failure values for each length of the mini dental implants were calculated and analysed using SPSS(®), via one-way ANOVA (p < 0.05). Results: The mean load to failure for mini dental implants was 329 N (SD 6.23), 326 N (SD 5.95), and 325 N (SD 6.99) for the 13 mm, 10 mm, and 8.5 mm implants, respectively. A comparison of means showed no significant difference between the groups (p = 0.70). The tested mini dental implants exhibited bending failure modes below the first thread. Conclusion: Under high compressive loading testing, there was no effect of the length on the failure of the mini dental implants following overloading. Moreover, all tested mini dental implants with different lengths showed the same failure mode and distortion location.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9323363
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93233632022-07-27 Does the Length of Mini Dental Implants Affect Their Resistance to Failure by Overloading? Alshenaiber, Rafif Silikas, Nick Barclay, Craig Dent J (Basel) Article Objective: We aimed to evaluate the failure resistance of different lengths of mini dental implants from the same manufacturer, and to assess their failure following overloading. Materials and Methods: According to the ISO 14801, 15 mini dental implants 2.4 mm in diameter, with lengths of 8.5 mm, 10 mm, or 13 mm, were subjected to compression loading until failure using a universal testing machine. The mean load-to-failure values for each length of the mini dental implants were calculated and analysed using SPSS(®), via one-way ANOVA (p < 0.05). Results: The mean load to failure for mini dental implants was 329 N (SD 6.23), 326 N (SD 5.95), and 325 N (SD 6.99) for the 13 mm, 10 mm, and 8.5 mm implants, respectively. A comparison of means showed no significant difference between the groups (p = 0.70). The tested mini dental implants exhibited bending failure modes below the first thread. Conclusion: Under high compressive loading testing, there was no effect of the length on the failure of the mini dental implants following overloading. Moreover, all tested mini dental implants with different lengths showed the same failure mode and distortion location. MDPI 2022-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9323363/ /pubmed/35877391 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj10070117 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Alshenaiber, Rafif
Silikas, Nick
Barclay, Craig
Does the Length of Mini Dental Implants Affect Their Resistance to Failure by Overloading?
title Does the Length of Mini Dental Implants Affect Their Resistance to Failure by Overloading?
title_full Does the Length of Mini Dental Implants Affect Their Resistance to Failure by Overloading?
title_fullStr Does the Length of Mini Dental Implants Affect Their Resistance to Failure by Overloading?
title_full_unstemmed Does the Length of Mini Dental Implants Affect Their Resistance to Failure by Overloading?
title_short Does the Length of Mini Dental Implants Affect Their Resistance to Failure by Overloading?
title_sort does the length of mini dental implants affect their resistance to failure by overloading?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9323363/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35877391
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj10070117
work_keys_str_mv AT alshenaiberrafif doesthelengthofminidentalimplantsaffecttheirresistancetofailurebyoverloading
AT silikasnick doesthelengthofminidentalimplantsaffecttheirresistancetofailurebyoverloading
AT barclaycraig doesthelengthofminidentalimplantsaffecttheirresistancetofailurebyoverloading