Cargando…
HFP‐QSMGAN: QSM from homodyne‐filtered phase images
PURPOSE: Homodyne filtering is a standard preprocessing step in the estimation of SWI. Unfortunately, SWI is not quantitative, and QSM cannot be accurately estimated from filtered phase images. Compared with gradient‐echo sequences suitable for computing QSM, SWI is more readily available and is oft...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9323427/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35381109 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.29260 |
_version_ | 1784756547808657408 |
---|---|
author | Beliveau, Vincent Birkl, Christoph Stefani, Ambra Gizewski, Elke R. Scherfler, Christoph |
author_facet | Beliveau, Vincent Birkl, Christoph Stefani, Ambra Gizewski, Elke R. Scherfler, Christoph |
author_sort | Beliveau, Vincent |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Homodyne filtering is a standard preprocessing step in the estimation of SWI. Unfortunately, SWI is not quantitative, and QSM cannot be accurately estimated from filtered phase images. Compared with gradient‐echo sequences suitable for computing QSM, SWI is more readily available and is often the only susceptibility‐sensitive sequence acquired in the clinical setting. In this project, we aimed to quantify susceptibility from the homodyne‐filtered phase (HFP), acquired for computing susceptibility‐weighted images, using convolutional neural networks to solve the compounded problem of (1) computing the solution to the inverse dipole problem, and (2) compensating for the effects of the homodyne filtering. METHODS: Two convolutional neural networks, the U‐Net and a modified QSMGAN architecture (HFP‐QSMGAN), were trained to predict QSM maps at different TEs from HFP images. The QSM maps were quantified from a gradient‐echo sequence acquired in the same individuals using total generalized variation (TGV)‐QSM. The QSM maps estimated directly from the HFP were also included for comparison. Voxel‐wise predictions and, importantly, regional predictions of susceptibility with adjustment to a reference region, were compared. RESULTS: Our results indicate that the U‐Net model provides more accurate voxel‐wise predictions of susceptibility compared with HFP‐QSMGAN and HFP‐QSM. However, regional estimates of susceptibility predicted by HFP‐QSMGAN are more strongly correlated with the values from TGV–QSM compared with those of U‐Net and HFP‐QSM. CONCLUSION: Accurate prediction of susceptibility can be achieved from filtered SWI phase using convolutional neural networks. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9323427 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93234272022-07-30 HFP‐QSMGAN: QSM from homodyne‐filtered phase images Beliveau, Vincent Birkl, Christoph Stefani, Ambra Gizewski, Elke R. Scherfler, Christoph Magn Reson Med Technical Notes–Imaging Methodology PURPOSE: Homodyne filtering is a standard preprocessing step in the estimation of SWI. Unfortunately, SWI is not quantitative, and QSM cannot be accurately estimated from filtered phase images. Compared with gradient‐echo sequences suitable for computing QSM, SWI is more readily available and is often the only susceptibility‐sensitive sequence acquired in the clinical setting. In this project, we aimed to quantify susceptibility from the homodyne‐filtered phase (HFP), acquired for computing susceptibility‐weighted images, using convolutional neural networks to solve the compounded problem of (1) computing the solution to the inverse dipole problem, and (2) compensating for the effects of the homodyne filtering. METHODS: Two convolutional neural networks, the U‐Net and a modified QSMGAN architecture (HFP‐QSMGAN), were trained to predict QSM maps at different TEs from HFP images. The QSM maps were quantified from a gradient‐echo sequence acquired in the same individuals using total generalized variation (TGV)‐QSM. The QSM maps estimated directly from the HFP were also included for comparison. Voxel‐wise predictions and, importantly, regional predictions of susceptibility with adjustment to a reference region, were compared. RESULTS: Our results indicate that the U‐Net model provides more accurate voxel‐wise predictions of susceptibility compared with HFP‐QSMGAN and HFP‐QSM. However, regional estimates of susceptibility predicted by HFP‐QSMGAN are more strongly correlated with the values from TGV–QSM compared with those of U‐Net and HFP‐QSM. CONCLUSION: Accurate prediction of susceptibility can be achieved from filtered SWI phase using convolutional neural networks. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-04-05 2022-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9323427/ /pubmed/35381109 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.29260 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Technical Notes–Imaging Methodology Beliveau, Vincent Birkl, Christoph Stefani, Ambra Gizewski, Elke R. Scherfler, Christoph HFP‐QSMGAN: QSM from homodyne‐filtered phase images |
title |
HFP‐QSMGAN: QSM from homodyne‐filtered phase images |
title_full |
HFP‐QSMGAN: QSM from homodyne‐filtered phase images |
title_fullStr |
HFP‐QSMGAN: QSM from homodyne‐filtered phase images |
title_full_unstemmed |
HFP‐QSMGAN: QSM from homodyne‐filtered phase images |
title_short |
HFP‐QSMGAN: QSM from homodyne‐filtered phase images |
title_sort | hfp‐qsmgan: qsm from homodyne‐filtered phase images |
topic | Technical Notes–Imaging Methodology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9323427/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35381109 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.29260 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT beliveauvincent hfpqsmganqsmfromhomodynefilteredphaseimages AT birklchristoph hfpqsmganqsmfromhomodynefilteredphaseimages AT stefaniambra hfpqsmganqsmfromhomodynefilteredphaseimages AT gizewskielker hfpqsmganqsmfromhomodynefilteredphaseimages AT scherflerchristoph hfpqsmganqsmfromhomodynefilteredphaseimages |