Cargando…

HFP‐QSMGAN: QSM from homodyne‐filtered phase images

PURPOSE: Homodyne filtering is a standard preprocessing step in the estimation of SWI. Unfortunately, SWI is not quantitative, and QSM cannot be accurately estimated from filtered phase images. Compared with gradient‐echo sequences suitable for computing QSM, SWI is more readily available and is oft...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Beliveau, Vincent, Birkl, Christoph, Stefani, Ambra, Gizewski, Elke R., Scherfler, Christoph
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9323427/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35381109
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.29260
_version_ 1784756547808657408
author Beliveau, Vincent
Birkl, Christoph
Stefani, Ambra
Gizewski, Elke R.
Scherfler, Christoph
author_facet Beliveau, Vincent
Birkl, Christoph
Stefani, Ambra
Gizewski, Elke R.
Scherfler, Christoph
author_sort Beliveau, Vincent
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Homodyne filtering is a standard preprocessing step in the estimation of SWI. Unfortunately, SWI is not quantitative, and QSM cannot be accurately estimated from filtered phase images. Compared with gradient‐echo sequences suitable for computing QSM, SWI is more readily available and is often the only susceptibility‐sensitive sequence acquired in the clinical setting. In this project, we aimed to quantify susceptibility from the homodyne‐filtered phase (HFP), acquired for computing susceptibility‐weighted images, using convolutional neural networks to solve the compounded problem of (1) computing the solution to the inverse dipole problem, and (2) compensating for the effects of the homodyne filtering. METHODS: Two convolutional neural networks, the U‐Net and a modified QSMGAN architecture (HFP‐QSMGAN), were trained to predict QSM maps at different TEs from HFP images. The QSM maps were quantified from a gradient‐echo sequence acquired in the same individuals using total generalized variation (TGV)‐QSM. The QSM maps estimated directly from the HFP were also included for comparison. Voxel‐wise predictions and, importantly, regional predictions of susceptibility with adjustment to a reference region, were compared. RESULTS: Our results indicate that the U‐Net model provides more accurate voxel‐wise predictions of susceptibility compared with HFP‐QSMGAN and HFP‐QSM. However, regional estimates of susceptibility predicted by HFP‐QSMGAN are more strongly correlated with the values from TGV–QSM compared with those of U‐Net and HFP‐QSM. CONCLUSION: Accurate prediction of susceptibility can be achieved from filtered SWI phase using convolutional neural networks.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9323427
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93234272022-07-30 HFP‐QSMGAN: QSM from homodyne‐filtered phase images Beliveau, Vincent Birkl, Christoph Stefani, Ambra Gizewski, Elke R. Scherfler, Christoph Magn Reson Med Technical Notes–Imaging Methodology PURPOSE: Homodyne filtering is a standard preprocessing step in the estimation of SWI. Unfortunately, SWI is not quantitative, and QSM cannot be accurately estimated from filtered phase images. Compared with gradient‐echo sequences suitable for computing QSM, SWI is more readily available and is often the only susceptibility‐sensitive sequence acquired in the clinical setting. In this project, we aimed to quantify susceptibility from the homodyne‐filtered phase (HFP), acquired for computing susceptibility‐weighted images, using convolutional neural networks to solve the compounded problem of (1) computing the solution to the inverse dipole problem, and (2) compensating for the effects of the homodyne filtering. METHODS: Two convolutional neural networks, the U‐Net and a modified QSMGAN architecture (HFP‐QSMGAN), were trained to predict QSM maps at different TEs from HFP images. The QSM maps were quantified from a gradient‐echo sequence acquired in the same individuals using total generalized variation (TGV)‐QSM. The QSM maps estimated directly from the HFP were also included for comparison. Voxel‐wise predictions and, importantly, regional predictions of susceptibility with adjustment to a reference region, were compared. RESULTS: Our results indicate that the U‐Net model provides more accurate voxel‐wise predictions of susceptibility compared with HFP‐QSMGAN and HFP‐QSM. However, regional estimates of susceptibility predicted by HFP‐QSMGAN are more strongly correlated with the values from TGV–QSM compared with those of U‐Net and HFP‐QSM. CONCLUSION: Accurate prediction of susceptibility can be achieved from filtered SWI phase using convolutional neural networks. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-04-05 2022-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9323427/ /pubmed/35381109 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.29260 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Technical Notes–Imaging Methodology
Beliveau, Vincent
Birkl, Christoph
Stefani, Ambra
Gizewski, Elke R.
Scherfler, Christoph
HFP‐QSMGAN: QSM from homodyne‐filtered phase images
title HFP‐QSMGAN: QSM from homodyne‐filtered phase images
title_full HFP‐QSMGAN: QSM from homodyne‐filtered phase images
title_fullStr HFP‐QSMGAN: QSM from homodyne‐filtered phase images
title_full_unstemmed HFP‐QSMGAN: QSM from homodyne‐filtered phase images
title_short HFP‐QSMGAN: QSM from homodyne‐filtered phase images
title_sort hfp‐qsmgan: qsm from homodyne‐filtered phase images
topic Technical Notes–Imaging Methodology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9323427/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35381109
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.29260
work_keys_str_mv AT beliveauvincent hfpqsmganqsmfromhomodynefilteredphaseimages
AT birklchristoph hfpqsmganqsmfromhomodynefilteredphaseimages
AT stefaniambra hfpqsmganqsmfromhomodynefilteredphaseimages
AT gizewskielker hfpqsmganqsmfromhomodynefilteredphaseimages
AT scherflerchristoph hfpqsmganqsmfromhomodynefilteredphaseimages