Cargando…

Brain morphometry and connectivity differs between adolescent‐ and adult‐onset major depressive disorder

BACKGROUND: Early‐onset (EO) major depressive disorder (MDD) patients experience more depressive episodes and an increased risk of relapse. Thus, on a neurobiological level, adult EO patients might display brain structure and function different from adult‐onset (AO) patients. METHODS: A total of 103...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Blank, Thomas S., Meyer, Bernhard M., Wieser, Marie‐Kathrin, Rabl, Ulrich, Schögl, Paul, Pezawas, Lukas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9323432/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35421280
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/da.23254
_version_ 1784756549173903360
author Blank, Thomas S.
Meyer, Bernhard M.
Wieser, Marie‐Kathrin
Rabl, Ulrich
Schögl, Paul
Pezawas, Lukas
author_facet Blank, Thomas S.
Meyer, Bernhard M.
Wieser, Marie‐Kathrin
Rabl, Ulrich
Schögl, Paul
Pezawas, Lukas
author_sort Blank, Thomas S.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Early‐onset (EO) major depressive disorder (MDD) patients experience more depressive episodes and an increased risk of relapse. Thus, on a neurobiological level, adult EO patients might display brain structure and function different from adult‐onset (AO) patients. METHODS: A total of 103 patients (66 females) underwent magnetic resonance imaging. Structural measures of gray matter volume (GMV) and functional connectivity networks during resting state were compared between EO (≤19 years) and AO groups. Four residual major depression symptoms, mood, anxiety, insomnia, and somatic symptoms, were correlated with GMV between groups. RESULTS: We found comparatively increased GMV in the EO group, namely the medial prefrontal and insular cortex, as well as the anterior hippocampus. Functional networks in EO patients showed a comparatively weaker synchronization of the left hippocampus with the adjacent amygdala, and a stronger integration with nodes in the contralateral prefrontal cortex and supramarginal gyrus. Volumetric analysis of depression symptoms associated the caudate nuclei with symptoms of insomnia, and persisting mood symptoms with the right amygdala, while finding no significant clusters for somatic and anxiety symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: The study highlights the important role of the hippocampus and the prefrontal cortex in EO patients as part of emotion‐regulation networks. Results in EO patients demonstrated subcortical volume changes irrespective of sleep and mood symptom recovery, which substantiates adolescence as a pivotal developmental phase for MDD. Longitudinal studies are needed to differentiate neural recovery trajectories while accounting for age of onset.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9323432
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93234322022-07-30 Brain morphometry and connectivity differs between adolescent‐ and adult‐onset major depressive disorder Blank, Thomas S. Meyer, Bernhard M. Wieser, Marie‐Kathrin Rabl, Ulrich Schögl, Paul Pezawas, Lukas Depress Anxiety Research Articles BACKGROUND: Early‐onset (EO) major depressive disorder (MDD) patients experience more depressive episodes and an increased risk of relapse. Thus, on a neurobiological level, adult EO patients might display brain structure and function different from adult‐onset (AO) patients. METHODS: A total of 103 patients (66 females) underwent magnetic resonance imaging. Structural measures of gray matter volume (GMV) and functional connectivity networks during resting state were compared between EO (≤19 years) and AO groups. Four residual major depression symptoms, mood, anxiety, insomnia, and somatic symptoms, were correlated with GMV between groups. RESULTS: We found comparatively increased GMV in the EO group, namely the medial prefrontal and insular cortex, as well as the anterior hippocampus. Functional networks in EO patients showed a comparatively weaker synchronization of the left hippocampus with the adjacent amygdala, and a stronger integration with nodes in the contralateral prefrontal cortex and supramarginal gyrus. Volumetric analysis of depression symptoms associated the caudate nuclei with symptoms of insomnia, and persisting mood symptoms with the right amygdala, while finding no significant clusters for somatic and anxiety symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: The study highlights the important role of the hippocampus and the prefrontal cortex in EO patients as part of emotion‐regulation networks. Results in EO patients demonstrated subcortical volume changes irrespective of sleep and mood symptom recovery, which substantiates adolescence as a pivotal developmental phase for MDD. Longitudinal studies are needed to differentiate neural recovery trajectories while accounting for age of onset. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-04-14 2022-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9323432/ /pubmed/35421280 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/da.23254 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Depression and Anxiety published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Blank, Thomas S.
Meyer, Bernhard M.
Wieser, Marie‐Kathrin
Rabl, Ulrich
Schögl, Paul
Pezawas, Lukas
Brain morphometry and connectivity differs between adolescent‐ and adult‐onset major depressive disorder
title Brain morphometry and connectivity differs between adolescent‐ and adult‐onset major depressive disorder
title_full Brain morphometry and connectivity differs between adolescent‐ and adult‐onset major depressive disorder
title_fullStr Brain morphometry and connectivity differs between adolescent‐ and adult‐onset major depressive disorder
title_full_unstemmed Brain morphometry and connectivity differs between adolescent‐ and adult‐onset major depressive disorder
title_short Brain morphometry and connectivity differs between adolescent‐ and adult‐onset major depressive disorder
title_sort brain morphometry and connectivity differs between adolescent‐ and adult‐onset major depressive disorder
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9323432/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35421280
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/da.23254
work_keys_str_mv AT blankthomass brainmorphometryandconnectivitydiffersbetweenadolescentandadultonsetmajordepressivedisorder
AT meyerbernhardm brainmorphometryandconnectivitydiffersbetweenadolescentandadultonsetmajordepressivedisorder
AT wiesermariekathrin brainmorphometryandconnectivitydiffersbetweenadolescentandadultonsetmajordepressivedisorder
AT rablulrich brainmorphometryandconnectivitydiffersbetweenadolescentandadultonsetmajordepressivedisorder
AT schoglpaul brainmorphometryandconnectivitydiffersbetweenadolescentandadultonsetmajordepressivedisorder
AT pezawaslukas brainmorphometryandconnectivitydiffersbetweenadolescentandadultonsetmajordepressivedisorder