Cargando…

Advanced bleeding control in combat casualty care: An international, expert-based Delphi consensus

Hemorrhage from truncal and junctional injuries is responsible for the vast majority of potentially survivable deaths in combat casualties, causing most of its fatalities in the prehospital arena. Optimizing the deployment of the advanced bleeding control modalities required for the management of th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vrancken, Suzanne M., Borger van der Burg, Boudewijn L.S., DuBose, Joseph J., Glaser, Jacob J., Hörer, Tal M., Hoencamp, Rigo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9323555/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35067523
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000003525
_version_ 1784756579777642496
author Vrancken, Suzanne M.
Borger van der Burg, Boudewijn L.S.
DuBose, Joseph J.
Glaser, Jacob J.
Hörer, Tal M.
Hoencamp, Rigo
author_facet Vrancken, Suzanne M.
Borger van der Burg, Boudewijn L.S.
DuBose, Joseph J.
Glaser, Jacob J.
Hörer, Tal M.
Hoencamp, Rigo
author_sort Vrancken, Suzanne M.
collection PubMed
description Hemorrhage from truncal and junctional injuries is responsible for the vast majority of potentially survivable deaths in combat casualties, causing most of its fatalities in the prehospital arena. Optimizing the deployment of the advanced bleeding control modalities required for the management of these injuries is essential to improve the survival of severely injured casualties. This study aimed to establish consensus on the optimal use and implementation of advanced bleeding control modalities in combat casualty care. METHODS: A Delphi method consisting of three rounds was used. An international expert panel of military physicians was selected by the researchers to complete the Delphi surveys. Consensus was reached if 70% or greater of respondents agreed and if 70% or greater responded. RESULTS: Thirty-two experts from 10 different nations commenced the process and reached consensus on which bleeding control modalities should be part of the standard equipment, that these modalities should be available at all levels of care, that only trained physicians should be allowed to apply invasive bleeding control modalities, but all medical and nonmedical personnel should be allowed to apply noninvasive bleeding control modalities, and on the training requirements for providers. Consensus was also reached on the necessity of international registries and guidelines, and on certain indications and contraindications for resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) in military environments. No consensus was reached on the role of a wound clamp in military settings and the indications for REBOA in patients with chest trauma, penetrating axillary injury or penetrating neck injury in combination with thoracoabdominal injuries. CONCLUSION: Consensus was reached on the contents of a standard bleeding control toolbox, where it should be available, providers and training requirements, international registries and guidelines, and potential indications for REBOA in military environments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9323555
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93235552022-08-03 Advanced bleeding control in combat casualty care: An international, expert-based Delphi consensus Vrancken, Suzanne M. Borger van der Burg, Boudewijn L.S. DuBose, Joseph J. Glaser, Jacob J. Hörer, Tal M. Hoencamp, Rigo J Trauma Acute Care Surg Independent Submission Hemorrhage from truncal and junctional injuries is responsible for the vast majority of potentially survivable deaths in combat casualties, causing most of its fatalities in the prehospital arena. Optimizing the deployment of the advanced bleeding control modalities required for the management of these injuries is essential to improve the survival of severely injured casualties. This study aimed to establish consensus on the optimal use and implementation of advanced bleeding control modalities in combat casualty care. METHODS: A Delphi method consisting of three rounds was used. An international expert panel of military physicians was selected by the researchers to complete the Delphi surveys. Consensus was reached if 70% or greater of respondents agreed and if 70% or greater responded. RESULTS: Thirty-two experts from 10 different nations commenced the process and reached consensus on which bleeding control modalities should be part of the standard equipment, that these modalities should be available at all levels of care, that only trained physicians should be allowed to apply invasive bleeding control modalities, but all medical and nonmedical personnel should be allowed to apply noninvasive bleeding control modalities, and on the training requirements for providers. Consensus was also reached on the necessity of international registries and guidelines, and on certain indications and contraindications for resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) in military environments. No consensus was reached on the role of a wound clamp in military settings and the indications for REBOA in patients with chest trauma, penetrating axillary injury or penetrating neck injury in combination with thoracoabdominal injuries. CONCLUSION: Consensus was reached on the contents of a standard bleeding control toolbox, where it should be available, providers and training requirements, international registries and guidelines, and potential indications for REBOA in military environments. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-08 2022-01-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9323555/ /pubmed/35067523 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000003525 Text en Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Independent Submission
Vrancken, Suzanne M.
Borger van der Burg, Boudewijn L.S.
DuBose, Joseph J.
Glaser, Jacob J.
Hörer, Tal M.
Hoencamp, Rigo
Advanced bleeding control in combat casualty care: An international, expert-based Delphi consensus
title Advanced bleeding control in combat casualty care: An international, expert-based Delphi consensus
title_full Advanced bleeding control in combat casualty care: An international, expert-based Delphi consensus
title_fullStr Advanced bleeding control in combat casualty care: An international, expert-based Delphi consensus
title_full_unstemmed Advanced bleeding control in combat casualty care: An international, expert-based Delphi consensus
title_short Advanced bleeding control in combat casualty care: An international, expert-based Delphi consensus
title_sort advanced bleeding control in combat casualty care: an international, expert-based delphi consensus
topic Independent Submission
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9323555/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35067523
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000003525
work_keys_str_mv AT vranckensuzannem advancedbleedingcontrolincombatcasualtycareaninternationalexpertbaseddelphiconsensus
AT borgervanderburgboudewijnls advancedbleedingcontrolincombatcasualtycareaninternationalexpertbaseddelphiconsensus
AT dubosejosephj advancedbleedingcontrolincombatcasualtycareaninternationalexpertbaseddelphiconsensus
AT glaserjacobj advancedbleedingcontrolincombatcasualtycareaninternationalexpertbaseddelphiconsensus
AT horertalm advancedbleedingcontrolincombatcasualtycareaninternationalexpertbaseddelphiconsensus
AT hoencamprigo advancedbleedingcontrolincombatcasualtycareaninternationalexpertbaseddelphiconsensus