Cargando…

Fracture Resistance of Monolithic Zirconia Crowns Depending on Different Marginal Thicknesses

Under some clinical conditions, the preparation of crowns of limited marginal thickness is inevitable. In such situations, it is questionable whether the same ideal preparation criteria can be applied equally. Since there are only a small number of studies focusing on the fracture resistance with re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Seung-Han, Yeo, Mi-Yeon, Choi, Sun-Young, Park, Eun-Jin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9323601/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35888327
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15144861
_version_ 1784756591858286592
author Kim, Seung-Han
Yeo, Mi-Yeon
Choi, Sun-Young
Park, Eun-Jin
author_facet Kim, Seung-Han
Yeo, Mi-Yeon
Choi, Sun-Young
Park, Eun-Jin
author_sort Kim, Seung-Han
collection PubMed
description Under some clinical conditions, the preparation of crowns of limited marginal thickness is inevitable. In such situations, it is questionable whether the same ideal preparation criteria can be applied equally. Since there are only a small number of studies focusing on the fracture resistance with respect to the marginal thickness, there is a need for a study evaluating whether zirconia crowns of limited marginal thickness are clinically acceptable. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the fracture resistance of monolithic zirconia crowns of limited marginal thickness in the posterior area. Methods: Abutments and CAD/CAM zirconia crowns with a marginal thickness of 1.0 mm were set as the control group, while experimental groups A, B, and C possessed reduced marginal thicknesses of 0.8 mm, 0.6 mm, and 0.4 mm, respectively (n = 10 per group). Resin-based abutment dies and monolithic zirconia crowns were fabricated using the CAD/CAM technique, and a universal testing machine was used to measure the fracture load value. Fractured specimens were examined with a scanning electron microscope. The data were analyzed using a one-way ANOVA and Bonferroni post hoc test (p < 0.05). Results: The means and standard deviations of the fracture load values of the control group and the three experimental groups were as follows: control group (1.0 mm): 3090.91 ± 527.77 N; group A (0.8 mm): 2645.39 ± 329.21 N; group B (0.6 mm): 2256.85 ± 454.15 N; group C (0.4 mm): 1957.8 ± 522.14 N. Conclusions: The crowns fabricated with a CAD/CAM zirconia block with limited marginal thicknesses of 0.6 mm and 0.4 mm showed significantly lower fracture resistance values compared to those with the recommended margin thickness of 1.0 mm.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9323601
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93236012022-07-27 Fracture Resistance of Monolithic Zirconia Crowns Depending on Different Marginal Thicknesses Kim, Seung-Han Yeo, Mi-Yeon Choi, Sun-Young Park, Eun-Jin Materials (Basel) Article Under some clinical conditions, the preparation of crowns of limited marginal thickness is inevitable. In such situations, it is questionable whether the same ideal preparation criteria can be applied equally. Since there are only a small number of studies focusing on the fracture resistance with respect to the marginal thickness, there is a need for a study evaluating whether zirconia crowns of limited marginal thickness are clinically acceptable. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the fracture resistance of monolithic zirconia crowns of limited marginal thickness in the posterior area. Methods: Abutments and CAD/CAM zirconia crowns with a marginal thickness of 1.0 mm were set as the control group, while experimental groups A, B, and C possessed reduced marginal thicknesses of 0.8 mm, 0.6 mm, and 0.4 mm, respectively (n = 10 per group). Resin-based abutment dies and monolithic zirconia crowns were fabricated using the CAD/CAM technique, and a universal testing machine was used to measure the fracture load value. Fractured specimens were examined with a scanning electron microscope. The data were analyzed using a one-way ANOVA and Bonferroni post hoc test (p < 0.05). Results: The means and standard deviations of the fracture load values of the control group and the three experimental groups were as follows: control group (1.0 mm): 3090.91 ± 527.77 N; group A (0.8 mm): 2645.39 ± 329.21 N; group B (0.6 mm): 2256.85 ± 454.15 N; group C (0.4 mm): 1957.8 ± 522.14 N. Conclusions: The crowns fabricated with a CAD/CAM zirconia block with limited marginal thicknesses of 0.6 mm and 0.4 mm showed significantly lower fracture resistance values compared to those with the recommended margin thickness of 1.0 mm. MDPI 2022-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9323601/ /pubmed/35888327 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15144861 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Kim, Seung-Han
Yeo, Mi-Yeon
Choi, Sun-Young
Park, Eun-Jin
Fracture Resistance of Monolithic Zirconia Crowns Depending on Different Marginal Thicknesses
title Fracture Resistance of Monolithic Zirconia Crowns Depending on Different Marginal Thicknesses
title_full Fracture Resistance of Monolithic Zirconia Crowns Depending on Different Marginal Thicknesses
title_fullStr Fracture Resistance of Monolithic Zirconia Crowns Depending on Different Marginal Thicknesses
title_full_unstemmed Fracture Resistance of Monolithic Zirconia Crowns Depending on Different Marginal Thicknesses
title_short Fracture Resistance of Monolithic Zirconia Crowns Depending on Different Marginal Thicknesses
title_sort fracture resistance of monolithic zirconia crowns depending on different marginal thicknesses
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9323601/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35888327
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15144861
work_keys_str_mv AT kimseunghan fractureresistanceofmonolithiczirconiacrownsdependingondifferentmarginalthicknesses
AT yeomiyeon fractureresistanceofmonolithiczirconiacrownsdependingondifferentmarginalthicknesses
AT choisunyoung fractureresistanceofmonolithiczirconiacrownsdependingondifferentmarginalthicknesses
AT parkeunjin fractureresistanceofmonolithiczirconiacrownsdependingondifferentmarginalthicknesses