Cargando…

Mifepristone (RU-486(®)) as a Schedule IV Controlled Drug—Implications for a Misleading Drug Policy on Women’s Health Care

Background: Mifepristone (RU-486) has been approved for abortion in Taiwan since 2000. Mifepristone was the first non-addictive medicine to be classified as a schedule IV controlled drug. As a case of the “misuse” of “misuse of drugs laws,” the policy and consequences of mifepristone-assisted aborti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hsieh, Yi-Ping, Wang, Yun-Ju, Feng, Ling-Yi, Wu, Li-Tzy, Li, Jih-Heng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9323789/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35886217
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19148363
_version_ 1784756639915573248
author Hsieh, Yi-Ping
Wang, Yun-Ju
Feng, Ling-Yi
Wu, Li-Tzy
Li, Jih-Heng
author_facet Hsieh, Yi-Ping
Wang, Yun-Ju
Feng, Ling-Yi
Wu, Li-Tzy
Li, Jih-Heng
author_sort Hsieh, Yi-Ping
collection PubMed
description Background: Mifepristone (RU-486) has been approved for abortion in Taiwan since 2000. Mifepristone was the first non-addictive medicine to be classified as a schedule IV controlled drug. As a case of the “misuse” of “misuse of drugs laws,” the policy and consequences of mifepristone-assisted abortion for pregnant women could be compared with those of illicit drug use for drug addicts. Methods: The rule-making process of mifepristone regulation was analyzed from various aspects of legitimacy, social stigma, women’s human rights, and access to health care. Results and Discussion: The restriction policy on mifepristone regulation in Taiwan has raised concerns over the legitimacy of listing a non-addictive substance as a controlled drug, which may produce stigma and negatively affect women’s reproductive and privacy rights. Such a restriction policy and social stigma may lead to the unwillingness of pregnant women to utilize safe abortion services. Under the threat of the COVID-19 pandemic, the US FDA’s action on mifepristone prescription and dispensing reminds us it is time to consider a change of policy. Conclusions: Listing mifepristone as a controlled drug could impede the acceptability and accessibility of safe mifepristone use and violates women’s right to health care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9323789
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93237892022-07-27 Mifepristone (RU-486(®)) as a Schedule IV Controlled Drug—Implications for a Misleading Drug Policy on Women’s Health Care Hsieh, Yi-Ping Wang, Yun-Ju Feng, Ling-Yi Wu, Li-Tzy Li, Jih-Heng Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Background: Mifepristone (RU-486) has been approved for abortion in Taiwan since 2000. Mifepristone was the first non-addictive medicine to be classified as a schedule IV controlled drug. As a case of the “misuse” of “misuse of drugs laws,” the policy and consequences of mifepristone-assisted abortion for pregnant women could be compared with those of illicit drug use for drug addicts. Methods: The rule-making process of mifepristone regulation was analyzed from various aspects of legitimacy, social stigma, women’s human rights, and access to health care. Results and Discussion: The restriction policy on mifepristone regulation in Taiwan has raised concerns over the legitimacy of listing a non-addictive substance as a controlled drug, which may produce stigma and negatively affect women’s reproductive and privacy rights. Such a restriction policy and social stigma may lead to the unwillingness of pregnant women to utilize safe abortion services. Under the threat of the COVID-19 pandemic, the US FDA’s action on mifepristone prescription and dispensing reminds us it is time to consider a change of policy. Conclusions: Listing mifepristone as a controlled drug could impede the acceptability and accessibility of safe mifepristone use and violates women’s right to health care. MDPI 2022-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9323789/ /pubmed/35886217 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19148363 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Hsieh, Yi-Ping
Wang, Yun-Ju
Feng, Ling-Yi
Wu, Li-Tzy
Li, Jih-Heng
Mifepristone (RU-486(®)) as a Schedule IV Controlled Drug—Implications for a Misleading Drug Policy on Women’s Health Care
title Mifepristone (RU-486(®)) as a Schedule IV Controlled Drug—Implications for a Misleading Drug Policy on Women’s Health Care
title_full Mifepristone (RU-486(®)) as a Schedule IV Controlled Drug—Implications for a Misleading Drug Policy on Women’s Health Care
title_fullStr Mifepristone (RU-486(®)) as a Schedule IV Controlled Drug—Implications for a Misleading Drug Policy on Women’s Health Care
title_full_unstemmed Mifepristone (RU-486(®)) as a Schedule IV Controlled Drug—Implications for a Misleading Drug Policy on Women’s Health Care
title_short Mifepristone (RU-486(®)) as a Schedule IV Controlled Drug—Implications for a Misleading Drug Policy on Women’s Health Care
title_sort mifepristone (ru-486(®)) as a schedule iv controlled drug—implications for a misleading drug policy on women’s health care
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9323789/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35886217
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19148363
work_keys_str_mv AT hsiehyiping mifepristoneru486asascheduleivcontrolleddrugimplicationsforamisleadingdrugpolicyonwomenshealthcare
AT wangyunju mifepristoneru486asascheduleivcontrolleddrugimplicationsforamisleadingdrugpolicyonwomenshealthcare
AT fenglingyi mifepristoneru486asascheduleivcontrolleddrugimplicationsforamisleadingdrugpolicyonwomenshealthcare
AT wulitzy mifepristoneru486asascheduleivcontrolleddrugimplicationsforamisleadingdrugpolicyonwomenshealthcare
AT lijihheng mifepristoneru486asascheduleivcontrolleddrugimplicationsforamisleadingdrugpolicyonwomenshealthcare