Cargando…

Visual Outcomes of Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) in Thin Corneas

We aimed to find out whether thin (≤500 μm) or normal (>500 μm, control) corneal thickness would impact efficacy and safety outcomes of small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). We retrospectively analyzed medical records of adult patients who had undergone SMILE. A total of 57 eyes were inclu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eskina, Erika, Klokova, Olga, Damashauskas, Roman, Davtyan, Karine, Pajic, Bojan, Movsesian, Marina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9324047/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35887926
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11144162
_version_ 1784756711262781440
author Eskina, Erika
Klokova, Olga
Damashauskas, Roman
Davtyan, Karine
Pajic, Bojan
Movsesian, Marina
author_facet Eskina, Erika
Klokova, Olga
Damashauskas, Roman
Davtyan, Karine
Pajic, Bojan
Movsesian, Marina
author_sort Eskina, Erika
collection PubMed
description We aimed to find out whether thin (≤500 μm) or normal (>500 μm, control) corneal thickness would impact efficacy and safety outcomes of small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). We retrospectively analyzed medical records of adult patients who had undergone SMILE. A total of 57 eyes were included in the “thin corneas” group and 180 eyes in the “control” group. At one month after surgery, rates of patients with uncorrected distance visual activity (UDVA) ≥ 0.8 were significantly higher in patients from the control group compared to the “thin corneas” group (87 vs. 71%, respectively p < 0.01), though rates were comparable at 3 months (87 vs. 76%, respectively, p > 0.05). SMILE had comparable safety in patients with thin and normal corneas. Procedure result predictability was comparable between groups. Regression analysis demonstrated that cap thickness impacted posterior corneal biomechanics, and the volume of removed tissue had a higher influence in patients with thin corneas. Moreover, an increase in cap thickness was associated with better final BCVA. Further study is needed for the evaluation of the impact of thin corneas on SMILE outcomes and planning. Our study also indicates that patients with thin corneas might require a different approach to nomogram calculation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9324047
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93240472022-07-27 Visual Outcomes of Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) in Thin Corneas Eskina, Erika Klokova, Olga Damashauskas, Roman Davtyan, Karine Pajic, Bojan Movsesian, Marina J Clin Med Article We aimed to find out whether thin (≤500 μm) or normal (>500 μm, control) corneal thickness would impact efficacy and safety outcomes of small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). We retrospectively analyzed medical records of adult patients who had undergone SMILE. A total of 57 eyes were included in the “thin corneas” group and 180 eyes in the “control” group. At one month after surgery, rates of patients with uncorrected distance visual activity (UDVA) ≥ 0.8 were significantly higher in patients from the control group compared to the “thin corneas” group (87 vs. 71%, respectively p < 0.01), though rates were comparable at 3 months (87 vs. 76%, respectively, p > 0.05). SMILE had comparable safety in patients with thin and normal corneas. Procedure result predictability was comparable between groups. Regression analysis demonstrated that cap thickness impacted posterior corneal biomechanics, and the volume of removed tissue had a higher influence in patients with thin corneas. Moreover, an increase in cap thickness was associated with better final BCVA. Further study is needed for the evaluation of the impact of thin corneas on SMILE outcomes and planning. Our study also indicates that patients with thin corneas might require a different approach to nomogram calculation. MDPI 2022-07-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9324047/ /pubmed/35887926 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11144162 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Eskina, Erika
Klokova, Olga
Damashauskas, Roman
Davtyan, Karine
Pajic, Bojan
Movsesian, Marina
Visual Outcomes of Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) in Thin Corneas
title Visual Outcomes of Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) in Thin Corneas
title_full Visual Outcomes of Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) in Thin Corneas
title_fullStr Visual Outcomes of Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) in Thin Corneas
title_full_unstemmed Visual Outcomes of Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) in Thin Corneas
title_short Visual Outcomes of Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) in Thin Corneas
title_sort visual outcomes of small-incision lenticule extraction (smile) in thin corneas
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9324047/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35887926
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11144162
work_keys_str_mv AT eskinaerika visualoutcomesofsmallincisionlenticuleextractionsmileinthincorneas
AT klokovaolga visualoutcomesofsmallincisionlenticuleextractionsmileinthincorneas
AT damashauskasroman visualoutcomesofsmallincisionlenticuleextractionsmileinthincorneas
AT davtyankarine visualoutcomesofsmallincisionlenticuleextractionsmileinthincorneas
AT pajicbojan visualoutcomesofsmallincisionlenticuleextractionsmileinthincorneas
AT movsesianmarina visualoutcomesofsmallincisionlenticuleextractionsmileinthincorneas