Cargando…

Low‐rank inversion reconstruction for through‐plane accelerated radial MR fingerprinting applied to relaxometry at 0.35 T

PURPOSE: To reduce scan time, methods to accelerate phase‐encoded/non‐Cartesian MR fingerprinting (MRF) acquisitions for variable density spiral acquisitions have recently been developed. These methods are not applicable to MRF acquisitions, wherein a single k‐space spoke is acquired per frame. Ther...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mickevicius, Nikolai J., Glide‐Hurst, Carri K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9324087/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35403235
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.29244
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: To reduce scan time, methods to accelerate phase‐encoded/non‐Cartesian MR fingerprinting (MRF) acquisitions for variable density spiral acquisitions have recently been developed. These methods are not applicable to MRF acquisitions, wherein a single k‐space spoke is acquired per frame. Therefore, we propose a low‐rank inversion method to resolve MRF contrast dynamics from through‐plane accelerated Cartesian/radial measurements applied to quantitative relaxation‐time mapping on a 0.35T system. METHODS: An algorithm was implemented to reconstruct through‐plane aliased low‐rank images describing the contrast dynamics occurring because of the transient‐state MRF acquisition. T(1) and T(2) times from accelerated acquisitions were compared with those from unaccelerated linear reconstructions in a standardized system phantom and within in vivo brain and prostate experiments on a hybrid 0.35T MRI/linear accelerator. RESULTS: No significant differences between T(1) and T(2) times for the accelerated reconstructions were observed compared to fully sampled acquisitions (p = 0.41 and p = 0.36, respectively). The mean absolute errors in T(1) and T(2) were 5.6% and 2.9%, respectively, between the full and accelerated acquisitions. The SDs in T(1) and T(2) decreased with the advanced accelerated reconstruction compared with the unaccelerated reconstruction (p = 0.02 and p = 0.03, respectively). The quality of the T(1) and T(2) maps generated with the proposed approach are comparable to those obtained using the unaccelerated data sets. CONCLUSIONS: Through‐plane accelerated MRF with radial k‐space coverage was demonstrated at a low field strength of 0.35 T. This method enabled 3D T(1) and T(2) mapping at 0.35 T with a 3‐min scan.