Cargando…

Nutritional Status after Roux-En-Y (Rygb) and One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (Oagb) at 6-Month Follow-Up: A Comparative Study

Introduction: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) are two effective bariatric surgical procedures with positive outcomes in terms of weight loss, comorbidities remission, and adverse events profiles. OAGB seems to carry a higher risk of malnutrition, but existin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gentileschi, Paolo, Siragusa, Leandro, Alicata, Federica, Campanelli, Michela, Bellantone, Chiara, Musca, Tania, Bianciardi, Emanuela, Arcudi, Claudio, Benavoli, Domenico, Sensi, Bruno
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9324253/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35889780
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu14142823
_version_ 1784756762212040704
author Gentileschi, Paolo
Siragusa, Leandro
Alicata, Federica
Campanelli, Michela
Bellantone, Chiara
Musca, Tania
Bianciardi, Emanuela
Arcudi, Claudio
Benavoli, Domenico
Sensi, Bruno
author_facet Gentileschi, Paolo
Siragusa, Leandro
Alicata, Federica
Campanelli, Michela
Bellantone, Chiara
Musca, Tania
Bianciardi, Emanuela
Arcudi, Claudio
Benavoli, Domenico
Sensi, Bruno
author_sort Gentileschi, Paolo
collection PubMed
description Introduction: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) are two effective bariatric surgical procedures with positive outcomes in terms of weight loss, comorbidities remission, and adverse events profiles. OAGB seems to carry a higher risk of malnutrition, but existing data are controversial. The aim of this study is to objectively evaluate and compare malnutrition in patients undergoing RYGB and OAGB. Methods: Retrospective monocentric study of obese patients undergoing RYGB or OAGB between the 15 September 2020 and the 31 May 2021. Nutritional status was assessed using the Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score and compared between groups. The primary outcome was the mean CONUT score at 6 months. The secondary outcomes included the incidence of malnutrition, comorbidities, including hypertension, insulin resistance and type II diabetes mellitus, and weight loss. Results: 78 patients were included: 30 underwent RYGB and 48 underwent OAGB. At 6-Month Follow-Up there was no difference between groups in the mean CONUT score nor in incidence of malnutrition. In both groups, the nutritional status significantly worsened 6 months after surgery (preoperative and postoperative score of 0.48 ± 0.9 and 1.38 ± 1.5; p = 0.0066 for RYGB and of 0.86 ± 1.5 and 1.45 ± 1.3; p = 0.0422 for OAGB). Type II Diabetes mellitus (DMII) and hypertension remission were significant in the OAGB group with a 100% relative remission in the DMII-OAGB group (p = 0.0265), and a 67% relative remission in the hypertension-OAGB group (p = 0.0031). Conclusions: No difference in nutritional status has been detected between patients undergoing RYGB or OAGB at the 6-Month Follow-Up. Both procedures may have significant mal-absorptive effects leading to decline in nutritional status. OAGB may be more efficacious in inducing DMII and hypertension remission. Larger prospective studies dedicated specifically to nutritional status after gastric bypass are needed to confirm the impact of different bypass procedures on nutritional status.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9324253
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93242532022-07-27 Nutritional Status after Roux-En-Y (Rygb) and One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (Oagb) at 6-Month Follow-Up: A Comparative Study Gentileschi, Paolo Siragusa, Leandro Alicata, Federica Campanelli, Michela Bellantone, Chiara Musca, Tania Bianciardi, Emanuela Arcudi, Claudio Benavoli, Domenico Sensi, Bruno Nutrients Article Introduction: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) are two effective bariatric surgical procedures with positive outcomes in terms of weight loss, comorbidities remission, and adverse events profiles. OAGB seems to carry a higher risk of malnutrition, but existing data are controversial. The aim of this study is to objectively evaluate and compare malnutrition in patients undergoing RYGB and OAGB. Methods: Retrospective monocentric study of obese patients undergoing RYGB or OAGB between the 15 September 2020 and the 31 May 2021. Nutritional status was assessed using the Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score and compared between groups. The primary outcome was the mean CONUT score at 6 months. The secondary outcomes included the incidence of malnutrition, comorbidities, including hypertension, insulin resistance and type II diabetes mellitus, and weight loss. Results: 78 patients were included: 30 underwent RYGB and 48 underwent OAGB. At 6-Month Follow-Up there was no difference between groups in the mean CONUT score nor in incidence of malnutrition. In both groups, the nutritional status significantly worsened 6 months after surgery (preoperative and postoperative score of 0.48 ± 0.9 and 1.38 ± 1.5; p = 0.0066 for RYGB and of 0.86 ± 1.5 and 1.45 ± 1.3; p = 0.0422 for OAGB). Type II Diabetes mellitus (DMII) and hypertension remission were significant in the OAGB group with a 100% relative remission in the DMII-OAGB group (p = 0.0265), and a 67% relative remission in the hypertension-OAGB group (p = 0.0031). Conclusions: No difference in nutritional status has been detected between patients undergoing RYGB or OAGB at the 6-Month Follow-Up. Both procedures may have significant mal-absorptive effects leading to decline in nutritional status. OAGB may be more efficacious in inducing DMII and hypertension remission. Larger prospective studies dedicated specifically to nutritional status after gastric bypass are needed to confirm the impact of different bypass procedures on nutritional status. MDPI 2022-07-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9324253/ /pubmed/35889780 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu14142823 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Gentileschi, Paolo
Siragusa, Leandro
Alicata, Federica
Campanelli, Michela
Bellantone, Chiara
Musca, Tania
Bianciardi, Emanuela
Arcudi, Claudio
Benavoli, Domenico
Sensi, Bruno
Nutritional Status after Roux-En-Y (Rygb) and One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (Oagb) at 6-Month Follow-Up: A Comparative Study
title Nutritional Status after Roux-En-Y (Rygb) and One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (Oagb) at 6-Month Follow-Up: A Comparative Study
title_full Nutritional Status after Roux-En-Y (Rygb) and One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (Oagb) at 6-Month Follow-Up: A Comparative Study
title_fullStr Nutritional Status after Roux-En-Y (Rygb) and One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (Oagb) at 6-Month Follow-Up: A Comparative Study
title_full_unstemmed Nutritional Status after Roux-En-Y (Rygb) and One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (Oagb) at 6-Month Follow-Up: A Comparative Study
title_short Nutritional Status after Roux-En-Y (Rygb) and One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (Oagb) at 6-Month Follow-Up: A Comparative Study
title_sort nutritional status after roux-en-y (rygb) and one anastomosis gastric bypass (oagb) at 6-month follow-up: a comparative study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9324253/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35889780
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu14142823
work_keys_str_mv AT gentileschipaolo nutritionalstatusafterrouxenyrygbandoneanastomosisgastricbypassoagbat6monthfollowupacomparativestudy
AT siragusaleandro nutritionalstatusafterrouxenyrygbandoneanastomosisgastricbypassoagbat6monthfollowupacomparativestudy
AT alicatafederica nutritionalstatusafterrouxenyrygbandoneanastomosisgastricbypassoagbat6monthfollowupacomparativestudy
AT campanellimichela nutritionalstatusafterrouxenyrygbandoneanastomosisgastricbypassoagbat6monthfollowupacomparativestudy
AT bellantonechiara nutritionalstatusafterrouxenyrygbandoneanastomosisgastricbypassoagbat6monthfollowupacomparativestudy
AT muscatania nutritionalstatusafterrouxenyrygbandoneanastomosisgastricbypassoagbat6monthfollowupacomparativestudy
AT bianciardiemanuela nutritionalstatusafterrouxenyrygbandoneanastomosisgastricbypassoagbat6monthfollowupacomparativestudy
AT arcudiclaudio nutritionalstatusafterrouxenyrygbandoneanastomosisgastricbypassoagbat6monthfollowupacomparativestudy
AT benavolidomenico nutritionalstatusafterrouxenyrygbandoneanastomosisgastricbypassoagbat6monthfollowupacomparativestudy
AT sensibruno nutritionalstatusafterrouxenyrygbandoneanastomosisgastricbypassoagbat6monthfollowupacomparativestudy