Cargando…

Evaluation of a Most Probable Number Method for Detection and Quantification of Legionella pneumophila

The detection and enumeration of Legionella pneumophila (L. pneumophila) in water is crucial for water quality management, human health and has been a research hotspot worldwide. Due to the time-consuming and complicated operation of the plate culture method, it is necessary to adopt a fast and effe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Niu, Chunyan, Zhang, Yajie, Zhang, Yong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9324539/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35890033
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11070789
_version_ 1784756832143671296
author Niu, Chunyan
Zhang, Yajie
Zhang, Yong
author_facet Niu, Chunyan
Zhang, Yajie
Zhang, Yong
author_sort Niu, Chunyan
collection PubMed
description The detection and enumeration of Legionella pneumophila (L. pneumophila) in water is crucial for water quality management, human health and has been a research hotspot worldwide. Due to the time-consuming and complicated operation of the plate culture method, it is necessary to adopt a fast and effective method for application. The present study aimed to comprehensively evaluate the performance and applicability of the MPN method by comparing its qualitative and quantitative results with the GB/T 18204.5-2013 and ISO methods, respectively. The qualitative results showed that 372 samples (53%) were negative for both methods; 315 samples (45%) were positively determined by the MPN method, compared with 211 samples (30%) using GB/T 18204.5-2013. The difference in the detection rate between the two methods was statistically significant. In addition, the quantitative results showed that the concentration of L. pneumophila by the MPN method was greater than ISO 11731 and the difference was statistically significant. However, the two methods were different but highly correlated (r = 0.965, p < 0.001). The specificity and sensitivity of the MPN method were 89.85% and 95.73%, respectively. Overall, the results demonstrated that the MPN method has higher sensitivity, a simple operation process and good application prospects in the routine monitoring of L. pneumophila from water samples.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9324539
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93245392022-07-27 Evaluation of a Most Probable Number Method for Detection and Quantification of Legionella pneumophila Niu, Chunyan Zhang, Yajie Zhang, Yong Pathogens Article The detection and enumeration of Legionella pneumophila (L. pneumophila) in water is crucial for water quality management, human health and has been a research hotspot worldwide. Due to the time-consuming and complicated operation of the plate culture method, it is necessary to adopt a fast and effective method for application. The present study aimed to comprehensively evaluate the performance and applicability of the MPN method by comparing its qualitative and quantitative results with the GB/T 18204.5-2013 and ISO methods, respectively. The qualitative results showed that 372 samples (53%) were negative for both methods; 315 samples (45%) were positively determined by the MPN method, compared with 211 samples (30%) using GB/T 18204.5-2013. The difference in the detection rate between the two methods was statistically significant. In addition, the quantitative results showed that the concentration of L. pneumophila by the MPN method was greater than ISO 11731 and the difference was statistically significant. However, the two methods were different but highly correlated (r = 0.965, p < 0.001). The specificity and sensitivity of the MPN method were 89.85% and 95.73%, respectively. Overall, the results demonstrated that the MPN method has higher sensitivity, a simple operation process and good application prospects in the routine monitoring of L. pneumophila from water samples. MDPI 2022-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9324539/ /pubmed/35890033 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11070789 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Niu, Chunyan
Zhang, Yajie
Zhang, Yong
Evaluation of a Most Probable Number Method for Detection and Quantification of Legionella pneumophila
title Evaluation of a Most Probable Number Method for Detection and Quantification of Legionella pneumophila
title_full Evaluation of a Most Probable Number Method for Detection and Quantification of Legionella pneumophila
title_fullStr Evaluation of a Most Probable Number Method for Detection and Quantification of Legionella pneumophila
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of a Most Probable Number Method for Detection and Quantification of Legionella pneumophila
title_short Evaluation of a Most Probable Number Method for Detection and Quantification of Legionella pneumophila
title_sort evaluation of a most probable number method for detection and quantification of legionella pneumophila
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9324539/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35890033
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11070789
work_keys_str_mv AT niuchunyan evaluationofamostprobablenumbermethodfordetectionandquantificationoflegionellapneumophila
AT zhangyajie evaluationofamostprobablenumbermethodfordetectionandquantificationoflegionellapneumophila
AT zhangyong evaluationofamostprobablenumbermethodfordetectionandquantificationoflegionellapneumophila