Cargando…

Clinical Performance of Rapid and Point-of-Care Antigen Tests for SARS-CoV-2 Variants of Concern: A Living Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Rapid antigen tests (RATs) for detecting severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) are widely used in the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic caused by diverse variants. Information on the real-world performance of RATs for variants is urgently needed for decision makers....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Jimin, Sung, Heungsup, Lee, Hyukmin, Kim, Jae-Seok, Shin, Sue, Jeong, Seri, Choi, Miyoung, Lee, Hyeon-Jeong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9324571/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35891461
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v14071479
_version_ 1784756840304738304
author Kim, Jimin
Sung, Heungsup
Lee, Hyukmin
Kim, Jae-Seok
Shin, Sue
Jeong, Seri
Choi, Miyoung
Lee, Hyeon-Jeong
author_facet Kim, Jimin
Sung, Heungsup
Lee, Hyukmin
Kim, Jae-Seok
Shin, Sue
Jeong, Seri
Choi, Miyoung
Lee, Hyeon-Jeong
author_sort Kim, Jimin
collection PubMed
description Rapid antigen tests (RATs) for detecting severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) are widely used in the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic caused by diverse variants. Information on the real-world performance of RATs for variants is urgently needed for decision makers. Systematic searches of the available literature and updates were conducted in PubMed, Ovid-MEDLINE, Ovid-EMBASE, CENTRAL, and KMBASE for articles evaluating the accuracy of instrument-free RATs for variants up until 14 March 2022. A bivariate random effects model was utilized to calculate pooled diagnostic values in comparison with real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction as the reference test. A total of 7562 samples from six studies were available for the meta-analysis. The overall pooled sensitivity and specificity of RATs for variants were 69.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 62.5% to 76.1%) and 100.0% (95% CI = 98.8% to 100.0%), respectively. When an additional 2179 samples from seven studies reporting sensitivities only were assessed, the pooled sensitivity dropped to 50.0% (95% CI = 44.0% to 55.0%). These findings suggest reassessment and monitoring of the diagnostic utility of RATs for variants, especially for the sensitivity aspect, to facilitate appropriate diagnosis and management of COVID-19 patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9324571
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93245712022-07-27 Clinical Performance of Rapid and Point-of-Care Antigen Tests for SARS-CoV-2 Variants of Concern: A Living Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Kim, Jimin Sung, Heungsup Lee, Hyukmin Kim, Jae-Seok Shin, Sue Jeong, Seri Choi, Miyoung Lee, Hyeon-Jeong Viruses Systematic Review Rapid antigen tests (RATs) for detecting severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) are widely used in the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic caused by diverse variants. Information on the real-world performance of RATs for variants is urgently needed for decision makers. Systematic searches of the available literature and updates were conducted in PubMed, Ovid-MEDLINE, Ovid-EMBASE, CENTRAL, and KMBASE for articles evaluating the accuracy of instrument-free RATs for variants up until 14 March 2022. A bivariate random effects model was utilized to calculate pooled diagnostic values in comparison with real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction as the reference test. A total of 7562 samples from six studies were available for the meta-analysis. The overall pooled sensitivity and specificity of RATs for variants were 69.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 62.5% to 76.1%) and 100.0% (95% CI = 98.8% to 100.0%), respectively. When an additional 2179 samples from seven studies reporting sensitivities only were assessed, the pooled sensitivity dropped to 50.0% (95% CI = 44.0% to 55.0%). These findings suggest reassessment and monitoring of the diagnostic utility of RATs for variants, especially for the sensitivity aspect, to facilitate appropriate diagnosis and management of COVID-19 patients. MDPI 2022-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9324571/ /pubmed/35891461 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v14071479 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Kim, Jimin
Sung, Heungsup
Lee, Hyukmin
Kim, Jae-Seok
Shin, Sue
Jeong, Seri
Choi, Miyoung
Lee, Hyeon-Jeong
Clinical Performance of Rapid and Point-of-Care Antigen Tests for SARS-CoV-2 Variants of Concern: A Living Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Clinical Performance of Rapid and Point-of-Care Antigen Tests for SARS-CoV-2 Variants of Concern: A Living Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Clinical Performance of Rapid and Point-of-Care Antigen Tests for SARS-CoV-2 Variants of Concern: A Living Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Clinical Performance of Rapid and Point-of-Care Antigen Tests for SARS-CoV-2 Variants of Concern: A Living Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Performance of Rapid and Point-of-Care Antigen Tests for SARS-CoV-2 Variants of Concern: A Living Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Clinical Performance of Rapid and Point-of-Care Antigen Tests for SARS-CoV-2 Variants of Concern: A Living Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort clinical performance of rapid and point-of-care antigen tests for sars-cov-2 variants of concern: a living systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9324571/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35891461
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v14071479
work_keys_str_mv AT kimjimin clinicalperformanceofrapidandpointofcareantigentestsforsarscov2variantsofconcernalivingsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT sungheungsup clinicalperformanceofrapidandpointofcareantigentestsforsarscov2variantsofconcernalivingsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT leehyukmin clinicalperformanceofrapidandpointofcareantigentestsforsarscov2variantsofconcernalivingsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kimjaeseok clinicalperformanceofrapidandpointofcareantigentestsforsarscov2variantsofconcernalivingsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT shinsue clinicalperformanceofrapidandpointofcareantigentestsforsarscov2variantsofconcernalivingsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jeongseri clinicalperformanceofrapidandpointofcareantigentestsforsarscov2variantsofconcernalivingsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT choimiyoung clinicalperformanceofrapidandpointofcareantigentestsforsarscov2variantsofconcernalivingsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT leehyeonjeong clinicalperformanceofrapidandpointofcareantigentestsforsarscov2variantsofconcernalivingsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT clinicalperformanceofrapidandpointofcareantigentestsforsarscov2variantsofconcernalivingsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis