Cargando…
Clinical Performance of Rapid and Point-of-Care Antigen Tests for SARS-CoV-2 Variants of Concern: A Living Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Rapid antigen tests (RATs) for detecting severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) are widely used in the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic caused by diverse variants. Information on the real-world performance of RATs for variants is urgently needed for decision makers....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9324571/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35891461 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v14071479 |
_version_ | 1784756840304738304 |
---|---|
author | Kim, Jimin Sung, Heungsup Lee, Hyukmin Kim, Jae-Seok Shin, Sue Jeong, Seri Choi, Miyoung Lee, Hyeon-Jeong |
author_facet | Kim, Jimin Sung, Heungsup Lee, Hyukmin Kim, Jae-Seok Shin, Sue Jeong, Seri Choi, Miyoung Lee, Hyeon-Jeong |
author_sort | Kim, Jimin |
collection | PubMed |
description | Rapid antigen tests (RATs) for detecting severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) are widely used in the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic caused by diverse variants. Information on the real-world performance of RATs for variants is urgently needed for decision makers. Systematic searches of the available literature and updates were conducted in PubMed, Ovid-MEDLINE, Ovid-EMBASE, CENTRAL, and KMBASE for articles evaluating the accuracy of instrument-free RATs for variants up until 14 March 2022. A bivariate random effects model was utilized to calculate pooled diagnostic values in comparison with real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction as the reference test. A total of 7562 samples from six studies were available for the meta-analysis. The overall pooled sensitivity and specificity of RATs for variants were 69.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 62.5% to 76.1%) and 100.0% (95% CI = 98.8% to 100.0%), respectively. When an additional 2179 samples from seven studies reporting sensitivities only were assessed, the pooled sensitivity dropped to 50.0% (95% CI = 44.0% to 55.0%). These findings suggest reassessment and monitoring of the diagnostic utility of RATs for variants, especially for the sensitivity aspect, to facilitate appropriate diagnosis and management of COVID-19 patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9324571 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93245712022-07-27 Clinical Performance of Rapid and Point-of-Care Antigen Tests for SARS-CoV-2 Variants of Concern: A Living Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Kim, Jimin Sung, Heungsup Lee, Hyukmin Kim, Jae-Seok Shin, Sue Jeong, Seri Choi, Miyoung Lee, Hyeon-Jeong Viruses Systematic Review Rapid antigen tests (RATs) for detecting severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) are widely used in the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic caused by diverse variants. Information on the real-world performance of RATs for variants is urgently needed for decision makers. Systematic searches of the available literature and updates were conducted in PubMed, Ovid-MEDLINE, Ovid-EMBASE, CENTRAL, and KMBASE for articles evaluating the accuracy of instrument-free RATs for variants up until 14 March 2022. A bivariate random effects model was utilized to calculate pooled diagnostic values in comparison with real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction as the reference test. A total of 7562 samples from six studies were available for the meta-analysis. The overall pooled sensitivity and specificity of RATs for variants were 69.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 62.5% to 76.1%) and 100.0% (95% CI = 98.8% to 100.0%), respectively. When an additional 2179 samples from seven studies reporting sensitivities only were assessed, the pooled sensitivity dropped to 50.0% (95% CI = 44.0% to 55.0%). These findings suggest reassessment and monitoring of the diagnostic utility of RATs for variants, especially for the sensitivity aspect, to facilitate appropriate diagnosis and management of COVID-19 patients. MDPI 2022-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9324571/ /pubmed/35891461 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v14071479 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Kim, Jimin Sung, Heungsup Lee, Hyukmin Kim, Jae-Seok Shin, Sue Jeong, Seri Choi, Miyoung Lee, Hyeon-Jeong Clinical Performance of Rapid and Point-of-Care Antigen Tests for SARS-CoV-2 Variants of Concern: A Living Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title | Clinical Performance of Rapid and Point-of-Care Antigen Tests for SARS-CoV-2 Variants of Concern: A Living Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Clinical Performance of Rapid and Point-of-Care Antigen Tests for SARS-CoV-2 Variants of Concern: A Living Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Clinical Performance of Rapid and Point-of-Care Antigen Tests for SARS-CoV-2 Variants of Concern: A Living Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical Performance of Rapid and Point-of-Care Antigen Tests for SARS-CoV-2 Variants of Concern: A Living Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Clinical Performance of Rapid and Point-of-Care Antigen Tests for SARS-CoV-2 Variants of Concern: A Living Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | clinical performance of rapid and point-of-care antigen tests for sars-cov-2 variants of concern: a living systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9324571/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35891461 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v14071479 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kimjimin clinicalperformanceofrapidandpointofcareantigentestsforsarscov2variantsofconcernalivingsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT sungheungsup clinicalperformanceofrapidandpointofcareantigentestsforsarscov2variantsofconcernalivingsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT leehyukmin clinicalperformanceofrapidandpointofcareantigentestsforsarscov2variantsofconcernalivingsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT kimjaeseok clinicalperformanceofrapidandpointofcareantigentestsforsarscov2variantsofconcernalivingsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT shinsue clinicalperformanceofrapidandpointofcareantigentestsforsarscov2variantsofconcernalivingsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT jeongseri clinicalperformanceofrapidandpointofcareantigentestsforsarscov2variantsofconcernalivingsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT choimiyoung clinicalperformanceofrapidandpointofcareantigentestsforsarscov2variantsofconcernalivingsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT leehyeonjeong clinicalperformanceofrapidandpointofcareantigentestsforsarscov2variantsofconcernalivingsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT clinicalperformanceofrapidandpointofcareantigentestsforsarscov2variantsofconcernalivingsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |